Elsevier

Journal of Hepatology

Volume 48, Issue 2, February 2008, Pages 192-199
Journal of Hepatology

Enhancement of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus replication by bile acids through FXR

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2007.09.015Get rights and content

Background/Aims

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients with high serum levels of bile acids (BAs) usually fail to respond to antiviral therapy. Besides, BAs are essential factors for replication of the porcine enteric calicivirus by inhibiting interferon signaling. The role of BAs on HCV RNA replication was thus assessed.

Methods

BAs and other compounds were tested using an HCV-replication model containing a luciferase reporter gene.

Results

BAs, especially chenodeoxycholate and deoxycholate, up-regulated genotype 1 HCV RNA replication by more than tenfold. Only free but not conjugated BAs were active, suggesting that their effect was mediated by a nuclear receptor. Only farnesoid X receptor (FXR) ligands stimulated HCV replication while FXR silencing and FXR antagonism by guggulsterone blocked the up-regulation induced by BAs. Furthermore, guggulsterone alone inhibited basal level of HCV replication by tenfold. Modulation of HCV replication by FXR ligands occurred in the same proportion in presence or absence of type I interferon, suggesting a mechanism of action independent of this control of viral replication. However, BAs or guggulsterone did not affect replication of genotype 2a-JFH1.

Conclusions

Exposure to routinely measured concentrations of BAs increases HCV replication by a novel mechanism involving activation of the nuclear receptor FXR.

Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a single-stranded positive RNA virus, which belongs to the genus Hepacivirus of the family Flaviviridæ. Around 170 million patients worldwide are chronically infected with HCV, frequently resulting in liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma [1]. The outcome of HCV infection varies among individuals and the likelihood of achieving a sustained response to antiviral treatment (SVR) depends on both viral and host characteristics. HCV variants are classified into six major genotypes that have a varied response to antiviral therapy. Indeed, only 45% of genotype 1 infected patients but 80% of those infected with genotype 2 or 3 reach a SVR with the current therapy combining ribavirin and peginterferon [2]. Among host factors associated with therapy outcome, serum bile acids (BAs) have been recently described as prognostic markers predicting a failure to reach SVR [3], [4]. Particularly, concentrations exceeding 15 μM associated with ferritin concentrations over 300 μg/ml are predictive of non-response to therapy. Primary BAs cholate (CA) and chenodeoxycholate (CDCA) are synthesized in the liver from cholesterol, conjugated with glycine or taurine to increase their hydrophilicity and secreted into the bile. In the intestinal tract, primary BAs are 7α-dehydroxylated by commensal bacteria, producing secondary BAs lithocholate (LCA) and deoxycholate (DCA). They are reabsorbed in the ileum and transported back to the liver [5]. BAs are not simply cholesterol’s catabolites, but are truly regulatory molecules with specific receptors. They control gene expression via nuclear receptors of the NR1 family: farnesoid X receptor (FXR; NR1H4) [6], [7], pregnane X receptor (PXR) [8], and vitamin D receptor [9]. Natural ligands of these receptors (BAs, sterols, fatty acids) are physiologically present at high concentrations [10] and activate their receptors with EC50 of 10–15 μM [11]. FXR is mainly expressed in the liver and intestine [12]. Hepatic FXR target genes are classified into several groups [11], [13]; one decreases hepatic BA concentrations by increasing export and decreasing synthesis; a second modulates seric lipoprotein levels and decreases plasma triglyceride concentrations. FXR also controls liver growth and regeneration in response to variations of BA concentrations [14], [15]. BAs also activate MAPK pathways through TGR5, a G-protein-coupled membrane receptor [16], [17]. TGR5 increases intracellular cAMP levels, thus inhibiting the activation of STAT1 by type I interferon (IFN). This IFN interference by BAs is an essential factor for the growth of the porcine enteric calicivirus (PEC), another single-stranded positive RNA virus [18].

In the light of recent observations that lipids play an important role in regulating HCV replication and eventually virus infectivity [19], [20], [21], the aim of the present study was to assess whether BAs had a direct effect on HCV RNA replication in cell lines harbouring HCV replicons.

Section snippets

Materials

Except IFNa-2b (Schering-Plough), chemicals were from Sigma. Compounds were prepared as 10 mM stock solutions in water, ethanol or dimethylsulfoxide according to their solubility. Stock solutions were diluted extemporaneously to 10× concentrated working solutions in complete DMEM and added to the cell cultures 4 h after electroporation.

Antibodies

NS4A (2E3C2) and NS5A (4F3H2) monoclonal antibodies were provided by bioMérieux (Dardilly, France). FITC-conjugated F(ab′)2 goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson

BAs up-regulate HCV RNA replication

Huh7 cells were treated with DCA, the major secondary BA representing around 20% of the total pool of BAs [5]. One hundred micromolar DCA was added to the culture medium. Luminescence in Rp-del-treated cells diminished continuously and reached background levels at 72 h (Fig. 1A) confirming that luciferase activity disappears in the absence of replication. Luciferase activity kinetics of mock and DCA-treated Rp-del cells were super-imposed, implying that DCA did not increase RNA stability or

Discussion

This is the first study describing the implication of FXR in viral replication. Physiological concentrations of BAs greatly enhanced HCV RNA replication. Although BAs inhibit the activation of major effectors of the IFN response [33], identical IC50s of IFN inhibited replication of HCV RNA in BAs-treated and untreated cells, indicating that the effect of BAs was independent of IFN modulation. Although BAs stimulate the replication of both HCV and PEC, PEC replication is increased through the

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida et les Hépatites (ANRS) and from INSERM.

References (52)

  • B. Rakic et al.

    Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha antagonism inhibits hepatitis C virus replication

    Chem Biol

    (2006)
  • S. Dharancy et al.

    Impaired expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha during hepatitis C virus infection

    Gastroenterology

    (2005)
  • K.H. Kim et al.

    HCV core protein induces hepatic lipid accumulation by activating SREBP1 and PPARgamma

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (2007)
  • D. Duran-Sandoval et al.

    Potential regulatory role of the farnesoid X receptor in the metabolic syndrome

    Biochimie

    (2005)
  • B. Cariou et al.

    FXR: a promising target for the metabolic syndrome?

    Trends Pharmacol Sci

    (2007)
  • Global surveillance and control of hepatitis C. Report of a WHO Consultation organized in collaboration with the Viral...
  • J.J. Feld et al.

    Mechanism of action of interferon and ribavirin in treatment of hepatitis C

    Nature

    (2005)
  • F. Jorquera et al.

    Usefulness of combined measurement of serum bile acids and ferritin as additional prognostic markers to predict failure to reach sustained response to antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis C

    J Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2005)
  • E. Lebovics et al.

    Pruritis in chronic hepatitis C: association with high serum bile acids, advanced pathology, and bile duct abnormalities

    Dig Dis Sci

    (1997)
  • M. Makishima et al.

    Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids

    Science

    (1999)
  • D.J. Parks et al.

    Bile acids: natural ligands for an orphan nuclear receptor

    Science

    (1999)
  • B. Goodwin et al.

    Identification of bile acid precursors as endogenous ligands for the nuclear xenobiotic pregnane X receptor

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2003)
  • M. Makishima et al.

    Vitamin D receptor as an intestinal bile acid sensor

    Science

    (2002)
  • G.A. Francis et al.

    Nuclear receptors and the control of metabolism

    Annu Rev Physiol

    (2003)
  • N.Y. Kalaany et al.

    LXRS and FXR: the yin and yang of cholesterol and fat metabolism

    Annu Rev Physiol

    (2006)
  • A. Geier et al.

    Bile acids are “homeotrophic” sensors of the functional hepatic capacity and regulate adaptive growth during liver regeneration

    Hepatology

    (2007)
  • Cited by (61)

    • Farnesoid X receptor (FXR): Structures and ligands

      2021, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Guggulsterone decreased CDCA-induced FXR activation with IC50 values of 15–17 mΜ [101]. Guggulsterone was once considered as a potentially effective treatment for patients with HCV genotype 1 who did not respond well to first-line therapy (NCT01492998) [64]. However, the trial was terminated.

    • Viruses traverse the human proteome through peptide interfaces that can be biomimetically leveraged for drug discovery

      2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors declare that they do not have anything to disclose regarding funding from industries or conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.

    View full text