Review
Novel advancements in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in 2008

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2008.01.022Get rights and content

New advancements have emerged in the field of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent years. There has been a switch in the type of presentation of HCC in developed countries, with a clear increase of tumors <2 cm in diameter as a result of the wide implementation of surveillance programs. Non-invasive radiological techniques have been developed and validated for the diagnosis of small and tiny HCCs. Simultaneously, diagnostic criteria based on molecular profiling of early tumors have been proposed. The current clinical classification of HCC divides patients into 5 stages with a specific treatment-oriented schedule. There is no established molecular classification of HCC, although preliminary proposals have already been published. Advancements in the treatment arena have come from well designed trials. Radiofrequency ablation is currently consolidated as providing better local control of the disease compared with percutaneous ethanol injection. New devices are available to improve the anti-tumoral efficacy of conventional chemoembolization. Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, has shown survival benefits in patients at advanced stages of the disease. This advancement represents a breakthrough in the management of this complex disease, and proves that molecular targeted therapies can be effective in this otherwise chemo-resistant tumor. Consequently, sorafenib will become the standard of care in advanced cases, and the control arm for future trials. Now, the research effort faces other areas of unmet need, such as the adjuvant setting of resection/local ablation and combination therapies.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health problem, being the sixth most common cancer worldwide with 626,000 new cases in 2002 [1]. The incidence of HCC is increasing in Europe and the United States [2], and is currently the leading cause of death amongst cirrhotic patients [3]. Chronic hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection is the predominant risk factor in Asia and Africa, and chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection in Western countries and Japan. Hepatocellular carcinoma develops in a cirrhotic liver in 80% of cases, and this pre-neoplastic condition is the strongest predisposing factor [4]. Chronic HBV carriers have a 100-fold relative risk for developing HCC, with an annual incidence rate of 2–6% in cirrhotic patients [6]. Aflatoxin B1 intake further enhances the risk. In Western countries and Japan, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the main risk factor, together with other causes of cirrhosis. Around 20–30% of the estimated 170 million HCV-infected individuals worldwide will develop cirrhosis. Once cirrhosis is established, the annual incidence of HCC is of 3–5%, and one third of them will develop a HCC over their lifetime [4].

During recent years, major advancements in the knowledge of this complex disease have been reported. We review herein these new data on surveillance and early diagnosis, the clinical and molecular classification of the disease, and the novel advancements in the management of this neoplasm. Specifically, we will analyze the advent of sorafenib as the first systemic therapy that has shown survival benefits, and pinpoint the most urgent unmet needs and how to design trials to capture benefits from efficacious drugs.

Section snippets

Early diagnosis of HCC: novel markers

Surveillance with ultrasound every 6 months for detection of early HCC is recommended in cirrhotic patients and other specific risk groups [5], [6]. The only randomised study reported so far comparing surveillance vs. non-surveillance has shown benefits in terms of higher applicability of curative therapies in Chinese patients infected with HBV regardless of the presence of cirrhosis [7]. European cohort studies and cost-effectiveness analysis further reinforce the benefits of this policy [3],

Clinical and molecular classification of HCC

Cancer classification is aimed to establish prognosis and select the adequate treatment for the best candidates. In addition, it aids researchers to exchange information and design clinical trials with comparable criteria. Clinical classifications have been proposed for most cancers. However, very few involve molecular data. Such is the case of breast cancer, where Her2/nu status discriminates subgroups of patients with different outcomes and treatment responses [24]. Similarly, EGFR mutational

New advancements and needs in clinical research

In oncology, the benefits of treatments should be assessed through randomised controlled trials and meta-analysis. Other sources of evidence, such as non-randomised clinical trials or observational studies are considered less robust. Few medical interventions have been thoroughly tested in HCC, in contrast with other cancers with a high prevalence worldwide, such as lung, breast, colo-rectal and stomach cancer [34], [47]. Unfortunately, the fact that HCC is a tumor with a low incidence in

Resection

Surgery is the mainstay of HCC treatment (Table 1). Resection and transplantation achieve the best outcomes in well-selected candidates (5-yr survival of 60–70%), and compete as the first option in patients with early tumors on an intention-to-treat perspective [4], [30], [31]. Hepatic resection is the treatment of choice for HCC in non-cirrhotic patients (5% of cases in the West, 40% in Asia) [48], [49]. Major resections can be performed with low rates of life-threatening complications. In

Liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is the first treatment choice for patients with small multinodular tumors (3 nodules <3 cm) or those with advanced liver dysfunction [4], [31] (Table 1, 3iiA). Theoretically, transplantation may simultaneously cure the tumor and the underlying cirrhosis. The broad selection criteria applied two decades ago led to poor results in terms of recurrence (32–54%) and survival (5-yr survival <40%), but allowed the identification of the best candidates for liver transplantation.

Local ablation

Percutaneous ablation achieves complete responses in more than 80% of tumors smaller than 3 cm in diameter, but in 50% of tumors of 3–5 cm in size [32] (1iiD). The best results obtained in series of HCC patients treated by percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) or radiofrequency ablation (RF) provide 5-yr survival rates of 40–70% [91], [92]. The best outcomes have been reported in Child–Pugh A patients with small single tumors, commonly less than 2 cm in diameter [32]. Independent predictors of

Chemoembolization and other locoregional treatments

Arterial embolization is the most widely used primary treatment for unresectable HCC [4], [11], [93]. In early stages, it is not indicated as first-line option, as an outcome review from Japan reported worse results than surgery or percutaneous ablation [11], [93]. Obstruction of hepatic artery induces extensive necrosis in large vascularized HCC. Embolizing agents – usually gelatin or microspheres – may be administered together with selective intra-arterial chemotherapy mixed with lipiodol

Systemic treatments

Hormonal compounds and conventional external beam radiation have not shown survival benefits in HCC. A meta-analysis of seven RCTs comparing tamoxifen vs. conservative management, comprising 898 patients, showed neither antitumoral effect nor survival benefit of tamoxifen (1iA) [33]. Two large RCTs were reported afterwards assessing tamoxifen [106], [107] with negative results in terms of survival. Thus, this treatment is discouraged in advanced HCC.

Systemic chemotherapy has been tested in nine

Molecular therapies in HCC: the case of sorafenib

The increasing knowledge in the molecular pathogenesis of HCC as well as the introduction of molecular targeted therapies in oncology have created an encouraging trend in the management of this malignancy (see reviews on [39], [112]). Table 5 depicts the molecular therapies currently tested within phase II and III clinical trials in HCC. Most of the treatments aim to abrogate signaling pathways related to proliferation and cell survival. Alternatively, other treatments rely on the blockade of

New endpoints in the design of clinical trials in HCC

The mechanism of action of biological agents against molecular targets has raised the question of which should be the primary and secondary endpoints in controlled phase II and phase III trials. Obviously, the primary endpoint for phase III studies is survival, and for adjuvant studies time to recurrence. Objective response is a weak surrogate of activity in phase II trials, since in most cases, the predominant effect of these compounds is basically cytostatic. In fact, bevacizumab has shown a

References (125)

  • Y. Kurokawa et al.

    Molecular-based prediction of early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Hepatol

    (2004)
  • J. Belghiti et al.

    Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection

    J Am Coll Surg

    (2000)
  • H. Bismuth et al.

    Hepatobiliary surgery

    J Hepatol

    (2000)
  • G. Marin-Hargreaves et al.

    Hepatocellular carcinoma: surgical indications and results

    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol

    (2003)
  • T. Kumada et al.

    Patterns of recurrence after initial treatment in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma

    Hepatology

    (1997)
  • H. Imamura et al.

    Risk factors contributing to early and late phase intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy

    J Hepatol

    (2003)
  • J. Bruix et al.

    Surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: prognostic value of preoperative portal pressure

    Gastroenterology

    (1996)
  • M. Burrel et al.

    MRI angiography is superior to helical CT for detection of HCC prior to liver transplantation: an explant correlation

    Hepatology

    (2003)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    Chromosomal changes and clonality relationship between primary and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

    Gastroenterology

    (2000)
  • S.D. Finkelstein et al.

    Microdissection-based allelotyping discriminates de novo tumor from intrahepatic spread in hepatocellular carcinoma

    Hepatology

    (2003)
  • T. Takayama et al.

    Adoptive immunotherapy to lower postsurgical recurrence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised trial

    Lancet

    (2000)
  • W.Y. Lau et al.

    Adjuvant intra-arterial iodine-131-labelled lipiodol for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomised trial

    Lancet

    (1999)
  • E. Boucher et al.

    Adjuvant intra-arterial injection of iodine-131-labeled lipiodol after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Hepatology

    (2003)
  • I.W. Graziadei et al.

    Chemoembolization followed by liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma impedes tumor progression while on the waiting list and leads to excellent outcome

    Liver Transpl

    (2003)
  • F.Y. Yao et al.

    Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival

    Hepatology

    (2001)
  • F.Y. Yao et al.

    The impact of pre-operative loco-regional therapy on outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

    Am J Transplant

    (2005)
  • M. Omata et al.

    Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by percutaneous tumor ablation methods: ethanol injection therapy and radiofrequency ablation

    Gastroenterology

    (2004)
  • S. Arii et al.

    Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan

    Hepatology

    (2000)
  • S. Shiina et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation with ethanol injection for small hepatocellular carcinoma

    Gastroenterology

    (2005)
  • S.M. Lin et al.

    Radiofrequency ablation improves prognosis compared with ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma < or =4 cm

    Gastroenterology

    (2004)
  • J.M. Llovet et al.

    Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2002)
  • C.M. Lo et al.

    Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

    Hepatology

    (2002)
  • D.M. Parkin et al.

    Global cancer statistics 2002

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2005)
  • H.B. El Serag et al.

    Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States

    N Engl J Med

    (1999)
  • J. Bruix et al.

    Management of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Hepatology

    (2005)
  • B.H. Zhang et al.

    Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • L. Bolondi et al.

    Surveillance programme of cirrhotic patients for early diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost effectiveness analysis

    Gut

    (2001)
  • Trinchet J, Beaugrand M from GRETCH. A randomized trial comparing 3-month vs. 6-month screening for HCC by...
  • I. Ikai et al.

    Reevaluation of prognostic factors for survival after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a Japanese nationwide survey

    Cancer

    (2004)
  • L. Bolondi et al.

    Characterization of small nodules in cirrhosis by assessment of vascularity: the problem of hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma

    Hepatology

    (2005)
  • M. Kojiro

    Focus on dysplastic nodules and early hepatocellular carcinoma: an Eastern point of view

    Liver Transpl

    (2004)
  • Y.N. Park et al.

    Neoangiogenesis and sinusoidal “capillarization” in dysplastic nodules of the liver

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (1998)
  • A. Forner et al.

    Diagnosis of hepatic nodules <20 mm in cirrhosis. Prospective validation of the AASLD guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

    Hepatology

    (2008)
  • M. Kojiro et al.

    Early hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodules

    Semin Liver Dis

    (2005)
  • S.W. Nam et al.

    Molecular changes from dysplastic nodule to hepatocellular carcinoma through gene expression profiling

    Hepatology

    (2005)
  • V. Paradis et al.

    Identification of a new marker of hepatocellular carcinoma by serum protein profiling of patients with chronic liver diseases

    Hepatology

    (2005)
  • E. Wurmbach et al.

    Genome-wide profiles of dysplasia and HCC in HCV-cirrhotic patients

    Hepatology

    (2007)
  • M.J. Piccart-Gebhart et al.

    Trastuzumab after adjuvant hemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • S. Kobayashi et al.

    EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • J.M. Llovet et al.

    Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification

    Semin Liver Dis

    (1999)
  • Cited by (807)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors receive consulting and lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from MDS Nordion, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Biocompatibles and Research grants from Exelixis. The authors have been supported by the following government grants: Dr. J.M. Llovet, National Institute of Health-NIDDK Grant 1R01DK076986-01, National Institute of Health, Spain (I+D Program, Grant No. SAF-2007-61898), and as Professor of Research at Institut Català de Recerca Avancada (ICREA); and from Samuel Wasman Cancer Research Foundation Dr. J. Bruix: National Institute of Health, Spain (FIS Program, Grant No. PI 05/150). We acknowledge the support of CIBERehd (Centro Investigaciones BioMedicas en Red, Instituto Carlos III).

    View full text