Globin-coupled sensors, protoglobins, and the last universal common ancestor

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.10.024Get rights and content

Abstract

The strategy for detecting oxygen, carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, and sulfides is predominantly through heme-based sensors utilizing either a globin domain or a PAS domain. Whereas PAS domains bind various cofactors, globins bind only heme. Globin-coupled sensors (GCSs) were first described as regulators of the aerotactic responses in Bacillus subtilis and Halobacterium salinarum. GCSs were also identified in diverse microorganisms that appear to have roles in regulating gene expression. Functional and evolutionary analyses of the GCSs, their protoglobin ancestor, and their relationship to the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) are discussed in the context of globin-based signal transduction.

Section snippets

History

In February of 2000, the first heme-based aerotactic transducers (HemAT) in Archaea and Bacteria were discovered [1]. Identified initially by their absorption spectra and heme-staining, HemAT-Hs from Halobacterium salinarum and HemAT-Bs from Bacillus subtilis were shown by time-lapsed capillary assay [2] to elicit aerophobic and aerophilic responses, respectively. While their C-termini were clearly identified as signaling domains analogous to those of bacterial chemotaxis proteins (MCP), the

Background

Globins are ubiquitous heme-binding α-helical proteins whose function is principally thought to regulate oxygen homoeostasis [1], [9]. Initially described as an eight-helix globin fold labeled A through H [10], other members of the globin family have been observed that are less helical, with the “truncated” globins maintaining the overall globin fold with as few as four helices [11]. In contrast to PAS domains that can bind an assortment of cofactors, globins are known to bind only heme.

The

GCS functional classification

As the number and domain variability of the GCSs identified increased, it became increasingly difficult to classify them on their own. Hence, all biological heme-based sensors with known functions were collected and classified as either aerotactic or gene regulating [7]. The gene regulating group was further subdivided into three subgroups: protein–DNA [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], protein–protein [1], [28], [29], [30], and second messenger [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36] pathways. The

GCS diversity and evolution

Examination of the GCS phylogenetic tree presented in Fig. 1(b) results in two possible interpretations: (1) certain bacterial species have a preference for specific signal transducing elements, and/or (2) the globin domains have evolved simultaneously with their signal transducing partners. Since the tree created was based on the globin sensor domain only, the branching-by-function observed demonstrates that aerotactic-type globins evolved from a common ancestral globin, or protoglobin, as did

Protoglobins in the archaea

Four proteins have been identified that conform to the protoglobin criteria set forth above, however only the archaeal proteins have been further analyzed [8]. These proteins were identified in the genome sequences of the Actinobacterium Thermobifida fusca, the green non-sulfur bacterium Chloroflexus aurantiacus, and the two Archaea A. pernix and M. acetivorans.

The proximal histidine was initially identified by sequence analysis (Fig. 1(a)) and later confirmed in the Archaeal protoglobins by

Ancient oxygen signaling and the future

The globin fold is successful at protecting the heme iron from rapid oxidation and yet allows reversible O2 binding. PAS domains are capable of accepting various input stimuli and participate in proteins regulating a whole slew of functions [40]. Some PAS domains are heme-binding (heme-PAS) domains as well, also capable of reversibly binding oxygen. A computer simulation study based on known PAS structures [52] suggests that a common conformational flexibility exists between these structures

Acknowledgement

This investigation was supported by a National Science Foundation Grant MCB0080125 and by a University of Hawaii intramural grant (M.A.).

References (58)

  • D. Boudko et al.

    J. Microbiol. Methods

    (2003)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Structure (Cambridge)

    (2003)
  • T.A. Freitas et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (2003)
  • M.F. Perutz

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (1989)
  • S. Aono et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • A. Ilari et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • M. Mukai et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • C. Tarricone et al.

    Structure

    (1997)
  • M.A. Gilles-Gonzalez et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1993)
  • M. David et al.

    Cell

    (1988)
  • Y. Sasakura et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • H.S. Yu et al.

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.

    (2002)
  • M.Y. Galperin et al.

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.

    (2001)
  • J. Castresana et al.

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (1995)
  • M. de Jesus-Berrios et al.

    Curr. Biol.

    (2003)
  • J. Vreede et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • K. Wakasugi et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • E. Geuens et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • M. Schmidt et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • J.J. Chen et al.

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (1995)
  • S. Hou et al.

    Nature

    (2000)
  • S. Hou et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2001)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Acta. Crystallogr. D

    (2003)
  • S. Hou et al.

    Extremophiles

    (2001)
  • T.A.K. Freitas et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2004)
  • N. Lane

    Oxygen. The Molecule that made the World

    (2002)
  • L. Moens et al.

    Mol. Biol. Evol.

    (1996)
  • A. Pesce et al.

    EMBO J.

    (2000)
  • E.S. Peterson et al.

    Biochemistry

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text