Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters
Chiropractic Management of Low Back Pain and Low Back-Related Leg Complaints: A Literature Synthesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.10.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this project was to review the literature for the use of spinal manipulation for low back pain (LBP).

Methods

A search strategy modified from the Cochrane Collaboration review for LBP was conducted through the following databases: PubMed, Mantis, and the Cochrane Database. Invitations to submit relevant articles were extended to the profession via widely distributed professional news and association media. The Scientific Commission of the Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters (CCGPP) was charged with developing literature syntheses, organized by anatomical region, to evaluate and report on the evidence base for chiropractic care. This article is the outcome of this charge. As part of the CCGPP process, preliminary drafts of these articles were posted on the CCGPP Web site www.ccgpp.org (2006-8) to allow for an open process and the broadest possible mechanism for stakeholder input.

Results

A total of 887 source documents were obtained. Search results were sorted into related topic groups as follows: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LBP and manipulation; randomized trials of other interventions for LBP; guidelines; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; basic science; diagnostic-related articles, methodology; cognitive therapy and psychosocial issues; cohort and outcome studies; and others. Each group was subdivided by topic so that team members received approximately equal numbers of articles from each group, chosen randomly for distribution. The team elected to limit consideration in this first iteration to guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, RCTs, and coh ort studies. This yielded a total of 12 guidelines, 64 RCTs, 13 systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and 11 cohort studies.

Conclusions

As much or more evidence exists for the use of spinal manipulation to reduce symptoms and improve function in patients with chronic LBP as for use in acute and subacute LBP. Use of exercise in conjunction with manipulation is likely to speed and improve outcomes as well as minimize episodic recurrence. There was less evidence for the use of manipulation for patients with LBP and radiating leg pain, sciatica, or radiculopathy.

Section snippets

Methods

Process development was guided by experience of commission members with the RAND consensus process,1 Cochrane collaboration, Agency for Health Care and Policy Research,2 and published recommendations3 modified to the needs of the council.

Results and Discussion

A total of 887 source documents were initially obtained. This included a total of 12 guidelines, 64 RCTs, 20 systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and 12 cohort studies. Table 1 provides an overall summary of the number of studies evaluated.

Conclusion

Existing research evidence regarding the usefulness of spinal adjusting/manipulation/mobilization indicates the following:

  • 1.

    As much or more evidence exists for the use of SMT to reduce symptoms and improve function in patients with chronic LBP as for use in acute and subacute LBP.

  • 2.

    Use of exercise in conjunction with manipulation is likely to speed and improve outcomes as well as minimize episodic recurrence.

  • 3.

    There was less evidence for the use of manipulation for patients with LBP and radiating leg

References (126)

  • DescarreauxM et al.

    Evaluation of a specific home exercise program for low back pain

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther

    (2002)
  • OngleyMJ et al.

    A new approach to the treatment of chronic low back pain

    Lancet

    (1987)
  • GilesLGF et al.

    Chronic spinal pain syndromes: a clinical pilot trial comparing acupuncture, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and spinal manipulation

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther

    (1999)
  • SantilliV et al.

    Chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of acute back pain and sciatica with disc protrusion: a randomized double-blind clinical trial of active and simulated spinal manipulations

    Spine J

    (2006)
  • WahlgrenDR et al.

    One-year follow-up of first onset low back pain

    Pain

    (1997)
  • HaasM et al.

    A practice-based study of patients with acute and chronic low back pain attending primary care and chiropractic physicians: two-week to 48-month follow-up

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther

    (2004)
  • LeapeLL et al.

    Group judgments of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition

    Qual Assur Health Care

    (1992)
  • Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G, et al. Acute low back problems in adults. Rockville (Md): Agency for Health Care Policy and...
  • National Health and Medical Research Council

    A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines

    (1999)
  • ChristensenM et al.

    Job analysis of chiropractic

    (2000)
  • ChristensenM et al.

    Job analysis of chiropractic

    (2005)
  • HurwitzE et al.

    Use of chiropractic services from 1985 through 1991 in the United States and Canada

    Am J Public Health

    (1998)
  • CoulterID et al.

    Patients using chiropractors in North America. Who are they, and why are they in chiropractic care?

    Spine

    (2002)
  • BombadierC et al.

    Back Group

  • BombardierC et al.

    Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures

    J Rheumatol

    (2001)
  • PetrieJC et al.

    The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Initiative: getting validated guidelines into local practice

    Health Bull (Edinb)

    (1995)
  • StroupDF et al.

    Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • ShekelleP et al.

    Ephedra and ephedrine for weight loss and athletic performance enhancement: clinical efficacy and side effects. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 76 [Prepared by Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center, RAND, under contract no. 290-97-0001, Task Order No. 9]. AHRQ Publication No. 03-E022

    (2003)
  • van TulderMW et al.

    Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions

    Spine

    (1997)
  • HagenKB et al.

    Bed rest for acute low back pain and sciatica (Cochrane Review)

  • HildeG et al.

    Advice to stay active as a single treatment for low back pain and sciatica

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2002)
  • WaddellG et al.

    Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain

    Br J Gen Pract

    (1997)
  • AssendelftWJ et al.

    Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2004)
  • HsiehCY et al.

    Functional outcomes of low back pain: comparison of four treatment groups in a randomized clinical trial

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther

    (1992)
  • CherkinDC et al.

    A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for low back pain

    N Engl J Med

    (1998)
  • MeadeTW et al.

    Low back pain of mechanical origin: randomized comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment

    Br Med J

    (1990)
  • MeadeTW et al.

    Randomized comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient management for low back pain: results from extended follow-up

    Br Med J

    (1995)
  • DoranDM et al.

    Manipulation in treatment of low back pain: a multicentre study

    Br Med J

    (1975)
  • SeferlisT et al.

    Conservative treatment in patients sick-listed for acute low-back pain: a prospective randomized study with 12 months' follow up

    Eur Spine J

    (1998)
  • WandBM et al.

    Early intervention for the management of acute low back pain

    Spine

    (2004)
  • HurleyDA et al.

    A randomized clinical trial of manipulative therapy and interferential therapy for acute low back pain

    Spine

    (2004)
  • GodfreyCM et al.

    A randomized trail of manipulation for low back pain in a medical setting

    Spine

    (1984)
  • RasmussenGG

    Manipulation in the treatment of low back pain (-a randomized clinical trial)

    Man Medizin

    (1979)
  • HadlerNM et al.

    A benefit of spinal manipulation as adjunctive therapy for acute low-back pain: a stratified controlled trial

    Spine

    (1987)
  • HadlerNM et al.

    Der nutzen van manipulationen als zusatzliche therapie bei akuten lumbalgien: eine gruppenkontrollierte studie

    Man Med

    (1990)
  • ErhardRE et al.

    Relative effectiveness of an extension program and a combined program of manipulation and flexion and extension exercises in patients with acute low back syndromes

    Phys Ther

    (1994)
  • von BuergerAA

    A controlled trial of rotational manipulation in low back pain

    Man Medizin

    (1980)
  • GemmellH et al.

    The immediate effect of Activator vs. Meric adjustment on acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther

    (1995)
  • MacDonaldR et al.

    An open controlled assessment of osteopathic manipulation in nonspecific low-back pain

    Spine

    (1990)
  • Cited by (0)

    All authors participated without compensation from any organization. There were no declared conflicts of interest.

    View full text