Original article
Depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders: Vague or distinct categories in primary care? Results from a large cross-sectional study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Depression, anxiety, and somatization are the most frequently observed mental disorders in primary health care. Our main objective was to draw on the often neglected general practitioners' (GPs) perspective to investigate what characterizes these three common mental diagnoses with regard to creating more suitable categories in the DSM-V and ICD-11.

Methods

We collected independent data from 1751 primary care patients (participation rate=77%) and their 32 treating GPs in Germany. Patients filled out validated patient self-report measures for depression (PHQ-9), somatic symptom severity (PHQ-15), and illness anxiety (Whiteley-7), and questions regarding coping and attribution of illness. GPs' clinical diagnoses and associated features were assessed.

Results

Patients diagnosed by their GPs with depression, anxiety, and/or somatoform disorders were significantly older, less educated, and more often female than the reference group not diagnosed with a mental disorder. They had visited the GP more often, had a longer duration of symptoms, and were more often under social or financial stress. Among the mental disorders diagnosed by the GPs, depression (OR=4.4; 95% CI=2.6 to 7.5) and comorbidity of somatoform, depressive, and anxiety disorders (OR=9.5; 95% CI=4.6 to 19.4) were associated with the largest degrees of impairment compared to the reference group. Patients diagnosed as having a somatoform/functional disorder only had mildly elevated impairment on all dimensions (OR=2.0; 95% CI=1.4 to 2.7). Similar results were found for the physicians' attribution of psychosocial factors for cause and maintenance of the disease, difficult patient–doctor relationship, and self-assessed mental disorder.

Conclusion

In order to make the DSM-V and ICD-11 more suitable for primary care, we propose providing appropriate diagnostic categories for (1) the many mild forms of mental syndromes typically seen in primary care; and (2) the severe forms of comorbidity between somatoform, depressive, and/or anxiety disorder, e.g., with a dimensional approach.

Introduction

Depression, anxiety, and somatization are the most common mental disorders in primary care [1]. General practitioners (GPs) are usually the first contact person for patients suffering from psychological and physical problems and therefore play a central role in the detection, prevention, and management of mental disorders. Adequate detection and management of these disorders pose a challenge to the health care system [2], [3], [4], [5]. Not only do these disorders have a high prevalence [6], [7], but patients suffering from them make up a disproportionately large portion of GPs' workloads and are often considered difficult and draining to treat [8].

Different groups often come to think about mental disorders from different viewpoints: patients based on life problems, GPs based on irregularities in management, and specialists based on preset nosological classifications [9]. This difference in perspective results in low rates of agreement between GPs' diagnoses and those derived from standard psychiatric classification systems [10], [11]. The use of standardized psychiatric instruments in primary care is uncommon because GPs usually consider the patients' history and social and family background information for diagnosis and treatment [12]. The categories of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) [13] and the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) [14] have also been deemed inadequate for general practice usage [15], [16]. These facts lead to the question of what information and which associated features determine the diagnosis of a specific mental disorder in general practice.

Given the impending revisions of DSM-IV and ICD-10, it would be beneficial to consider how to make the new presentation more accessible and user friendly for GPs and other nonspecialists [17], [18]. The DSM-V and ICD-11 would be more broadly relied upon if they addressed themselves also to GPs and other health care workers who do not have the same understanding of mental disorders as specialists do.

Hence, the main aim of this study was to analyze clinically relevant features when GPs diagnose the three most common psychiatric syndromes in primary care: depression, anxiety, and somatization. Therefore, we used data from a large primary care study. In order to obtain more knowledge about how GPs think about mental disorders, we first compared the demographic and clinical characteristics of patient groups with different mental disorders as diagnosed by the GPs. Second, the agreement between GPs' diagnoses and patient self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and somatization was assessed. Third, we investigated which clinical characteristics, explanatory models, and patient self-report measures were associated with GPs' diagnoses.

Section snippets

Study design and subjects

This study was part of “FUNKTIONAL,” a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted to evaluate a guideline-based curriculum for early diagnosis and treatment of functional/somatoform complaints in general practice (trial registration: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN27782834) [19], [20]. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg.

For patient recruitment, 78 GPs in the Rhein-Neckar region in Germany were invited to participate in our study. Of those, 32 GPs

Characteristics of GPs and patients

Of the 29 participating practices, 24 (75%) were single practices and 18 (56%) were located in urban regions. Twenty-three (72%) of the GPs were male. The mean number of years in general practice was 14.3 (S.D.=8.8). Twenty-four (75%) GPs had a basic qualification in psychosocial primary care; 21 (66%) GPs had Balint group experience.

Of the 4087 patients who presented on the screening days, 2460 met the inclusion criteria and were eligible for participation in our study. Of those, 562 (23%)

Discussion

This large primary-care study analyzes the relevance of specific clinically important features when GPs diagnose depression, anxiety, and/or somatization. It has several major findings. First, patients diagnosed by their GPs with depression, anxiety, and/or somatoform disorders are characterized by chronic illness, psychosocial and financial stress, difficult doctor–patient relations, symptom-related functional impairment, and self-attribution of mental disorders. These results suggest that GPs

Acknowledgments

We thank the practices and patients who participated in the study. We also thank our student assistants who visited the practices to recruit the subjects. We thank the American Journal Experts Service for proofreading and commenting on the manuscript.

References (59)

  • LöweB et al.

    Efficacy, predictors of therapy response, and safety of sertraline in routine clinical practice: prospective, open-label, non-interventional postmarketing surveillance study in 1878 patients

    J Affect Disord

    (2005)
  • HahnSR et al.

    The difficult doctor–patient relationship: somatization, personality and psychopathology

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1994)
  • MorrissRK et al.

    Treatment of patients with somatized mental disorder: effects of reattribution training on outcomes under the direct control of the family doctor

    Psychosomatics

    (2002)
  • RiefW et al.

    Evaluation of general practitioners' training: how to manage patients with unexplained physical symptoms

    Psychosomatics

    (2006)
  • DickinsonWP et al.

    The somatization in primary care study: a tale of three diagnoses

    Gen Hosp Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • LinzerM et al.

    Gender, quality of life, and mental disorders in primary care: results from the PRIME-MD 1000 Study

    Am J Med

    (1996)
  • WilliamsJB et al.

    Gender differences in depression in primary care

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1995)
  • VerhaakPFM et al.

    Patients with a psychiatric disorder in general practice: determinants of general practitioners' psychological diagnosis

    Gen Hosp Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • FurediJ et al.

    The role of symptoms in the recognition of mental health disorders in primary care

    Psychosomatics

    (2003)
  • CreedF et al.

    A systematic review of the epidemiology of somatisation disorder and hypochondriasis

    J Psychosom Res

    (2004)
  • ToftT et al.

    Mental disorders in primary care: prevalence and co-morbidity among disorders. Results from the functional illness in primary care (FIP) study

    Psychol Med

    (2005)
  • de WaalMW et al.

    Follow-up study on health care use of patients with somatoform, anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care

    BMC Fam Pract

    (2008)
  • GaskL et al.

    Evaluating models of working at the interface between mental health services and primary care

    Br J Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • de WaalMWM et al.

    Somatoform disorders in general practice: prevalence, functional impairment and comorbidity with anxiety and depressive disorders

    Br J Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • HenningsenP et al.

    Medically unexplained physical symptoms, anxiety, and depression: a meta-analytic review

    Psychosom Med

    (2003)
  • ZantingeEM et al.

    The workload of GPs: patients with psychological and somatic problems compared

    Fam Pract

    (2005)
  • General practitioner recognition of mental illness in the absence of a ‘gold standard’

    Aust N Z J Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • LloydDHO

    Patient care and the general practitioner

    Br Med J

    (1994)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder

    (1994)
  • Cited by (0)

    This study was part of a General Practice and Health Services Research Network project (Director: Professor Dr. Szecsenyi) and funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

    View full text