Original articleDepression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders: Vague or distinct categories in primary care? Results from a large cross-sectional study☆
Introduction
Depression, anxiety, and somatization are the most common mental disorders in primary care [1]. General practitioners (GPs) are usually the first contact person for patients suffering from psychological and physical problems and therefore play a central role in the detection, prevention, and management of mental disorders. Adequate detection and management of these disorders pose a challenge to the health care system [2], [3], [4], [5]. Not only do these disorders have a high prevalence [6], [7], but patients suffering from them make up a disproportionately large portion of GPs' workloads and are often considered difficult and draining to treat [8].
Different groups often come to think about mental disorders from different viewpoints: patients based on life problems, GPs based on irregularities in management, and specialists based on preset nosological classifications [9]. This difference in perspective results in low rates of agreement between GPs' diagnoses and those derived from standard psychiatric classification systems [10], [11]. The use of standardized psychiatric instruments in primary care is uncommon because GPs usually consider the patients' history and social and family background information for diagnosis and treatment [12]. The categories of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) [13] and the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) [14] have also been deemed inadequate for general practice usage [15], [16]. These facts lead to the question of what information and which associated features determine the diagnosis of a specific mental disorder in general practice.
Given the impending revisions of DSM-IV and ICD-10, it would be beneficial to consider how to make the new presentation more accessible and user friendly for GPs and other nonspecialists [17], [18]. The DSM-V and ICD-11 would be more broadly relied upon if they addressed themselves also to GPs and other health care workers who do not have the same understanding of mental disorders as specialists do.
Hence, the main aim of this study was to analyze clinically relevant features when GPs diagnose the three most common psychiatric syndromes in primary care: depression, anxiety, and somatization. Therefore, we used data from a large primary care study. In order to obtain more knowledge about how GPs think about mental disorders, we first compared the demographic and clinical characteristics of patient groups with different mental disorders as diagnosed by the GPs. Second, the agreement between GPs' diagnoses and patient self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and somatization was assessed. Third, we investigated which clinical characteristics, explanatory models, and patient self-report measures were associated with GPs' diagnoses.
Section snippets
Study design and subjects
This study was part of “FUNKTIONAL,” a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted to evaluate a guideline-based curriculum for early diagnosis and treatment of functional/somatoform complaints in general practice (trial registration: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN27782834) [19], [20]. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg.
For patient recruitment, 78 GPs in the Rhein-Neckar region in Germany were invited to participate in our study. Of those, 32 GPs
Characteristics of GPs and patients
Of the 29 participating practices, 24 (75%) were single practices and 18 (56%) were located in urban regions. Twenty-three (72%) of the GPs were male. The mean number of years in general practice was 14.3 (S.D.=8.8). Twenty-four (75%) GPs had a basic qualification in psychosocial primary care; 21 (66%) GPs had Balint group experience.
Of the 4087 patients who presented on the screening days, 2460 met the inclusion criteria and were eligible for participation in our study. Of those, 562 (23%)
Discussion
This large primary-care study analyzes the relevance of specific clinically important features when GPs diagnose depression, anxiety, and/or somatization. It has several major findings. First, patients diagnosed by their GPs with depression, anxiety, and/or somatoform disorders are characterized by chronic illness, psychosocial and financial stress, difficult doctor–patient relations, symptom-related functional impairment, and self-attribution of mental disorders. These results suggest that GPs
Acknowledgments
We thank the practices and patients who participated in the study. We also thank our student assistants who visited the practices to recruit the subjects. We thank the American Journal Experts Service for proofreading and commenting on the manuscript.
References (59)
- et al.
Management of functional somatic syndromes
Lancet
(2007) - et al.
Depression and physical comorbidity in primary care
J Psychosom Res
(2007) - et al.
Somatization in primary care. Prevalence, health care utilization, and general practitioner recognition
Psychosomatics
(1999) - et al.
Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians' diagnoses
J Affect Disord
(2004) Can DSM-V facilitate productive research into the somatoform disorders?
J Psychosom Res
(2006)- et al.
A symptom checklist to screen for somatoform disorders in primary care
Psychosomatics
(1998) - et al.
Somatic complaints in primary care: further examining the validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15)
Psychosomatics
(2006) - et al.
Detecting panic disorder in medical and psychosomatic outpatients: comparative validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire, a screening question, and physicians' diagnosis
J Psychosom Res
(2003) - et al.
Screening for somatization and hypochondriasis in primary care and neurological in-patients: a seven-item scale for hypochondriasis and somatization
J Psychosom Res
(1999) - et al.
Dimensionality of the Whiteley Index: assessment of hypochondriasis in an Australian sample of primary care patients
J Psychosom Res
(2006)
Efficacy, predictors of therapy response, and safety of sertraline in routine clinical practice: prospective, open-label, non-interventional postmarketing surveillance study in 1878 patients
J Affect Disord
The difficult doctor–patient relationship: somatization, personality and psychopathology
J Clin Epidemiol
Treatment of patients with somatized mental disorder: effects of reattribution training on outcomes under the direct control of the family doctor
Psychosomatics
Evaluation of general practitioners' training: how to manage patients with unexplained physical symptoms
Psychosomatics
The somatization in primary care study: a tale of three diagnoses
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
Gender, quality of life, and mental disorders in primary care: results from the PRIME-MD 1000 Study
Am J Med
Gender differences in depression in primary care
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Patients with a psychiatric disorder in general practice: determinants of general practitioners' psychological diagnosis
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
The role of symptoms in the recognition of mental health disorders in primary care
Psychosomatics
A systematic review of the epidemiology of somatisation disorder and hypochondriasis
J Psychosom Res
Mental disorders in primary care: prevalence and co-morbidity among disorders. Results from the functional illness in primary care (FIP) study
Psychol Med
Follow-up study on health care use of patients with somatoform, anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care
BMC Fam Pract
Evaluating models of working at the interface between mental health services and primary care
Br J Psychiatry
Somatoform disorders in general practice: prevalence, functional impairment and comorbidity with anxiety and depressive disorders
Br J Psychiatry
Medically unexplained physical symptoms, anxiety, and depression: a meta-analytic review
Psychosom Med
The workload of GPs: patients with psychological and somatic problems compared
Fam Pract
General practitioner recognition of mental illness in the absence of a ‘gold standard’
Aust N Z J Psychiatry
Patient care and the general practitioner
Br Med J
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder
Cited by (0)
- ☆
This study was part of a General Practice and Health Services Research Network project (Director: Professor Dr. Szecsenyi) and funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).