Gender differences in the motivational processing of facial beauty

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2007.09.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Gender may be involved in the motivational processing of facial beauty. This study applied a behavioral probe, known to activate brain motivational regions, to healthy heterosexual subjects. Matched samples of men and women were administered two tasks: (a) key pressing to change the viewing time of average or beautiful female or male facial images, and (b) rating the attractiveness of these images. Men expended more effort (via the key-press task) to extend the viewing time of the beautiful female faces. Women displayed similarly increased effort for beautiful male and female images, but the magnitude of this effort was substantially lower than that of men for beautiful females. Heterosexual facial attractiveness ratings were comparable in both groups. These findings demonstrate heterosexual specificity of facial motivational targets for men, but not for women. Moreover, heightened drive for the pursuit of heterosexual beauty in the face of regular valuational assessments, displayed by men, suggests a gender-specific incentive sensitization phenomenon.

Section snippets

Participants

For clarity of presentation, study participants are referred to as “men” and “women” and facial images as “male” and “female”. Study subjects comprised healthy individuals, as determined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders (SCID-I/NP; First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 2002). Their self-reported heterosexual status was confirmed with the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG; Klein, Sepekoff, & Wolf, 1985) that assessed the sexual self (attraction, fantasy, and

Results

Men and women groups were similar with respect to age [M = 28.7, SD = 8.4 vs. M = 25.0, SD = 3.3; t(33) = 1.60, p = .10] and years of education [M = 15.7, SD = 1.5 vs. 15.8 , SD = 1.5; t(33) = −0.20, p = .84)]. Fig. 2 displays the rating and net key-press data for each category. Overall, the two groups did not differ in the attractiveness ratings [group effect: F(1, 33) = 2.92, p = .10], but beautiful faces’ ratings significantly exceeded those of the average faces [Faces Type effect: F(3, 99) = 127.90, p < .0001] with men

Discussion

The results of the current study provide empirical laboratory-based evidence for the motivational value of beauty. Our interpretation that the observed gender differences are related to motivational drives of the viewers (Senior, 2003) rather than to social acceptance or desirability of prolonged viewing behavior towards opposite sexes is supported by recent work demonstrating stronger fMRI activations within motivational/reward regions by female than by male faces for heterosexual men and by

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Alumit Ishai for her insightful comments on the manuscript.

References (35)

  • C.B. Saper et al.

    The need to feed: Homeostatic and hedonic control of eating

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • K.C. Berridge

    The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: The case for incentive salience

    Psychopharmacology (Berl)

    (2006)
  • S. Bray et al.

    Neural coding of reward-prediction error signals during classical conditioning with attractive faces

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2007)
  • D.M. Buss

    Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (1989)
  • D.M. Buss et al.

    Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating

    Psychological Review

    (1993)
  • M.R. Cunningham

    Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasiexperiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • C. Darwin

    The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex

    (1871)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Do partnered women discriminate men's faces less along the attractiveness dimension?

      2016, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      In Study 2, attractiveness had a positive effect on key-press scores for men's faces, indicating that more attractive men's faces were more rewarding to women. This pattern of results is consistent with previous research that also reported positive effects of attractiveness on this measure of the reward value of men's faces (Hahn et al., 2014, 2015; Levy et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2014). While both studies show that women generally discriminate men's faces along the attractiveness dimension, we found no evidence that the relationships between attractiveness and memory for men's faces or attractiveness and the reward value of men's faces were significantly different for partnered and unpartnered women or for partnered women who scored above or below the median on a combined relationship happiness and commitment score.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by Grant D.A. #017959 (I.E.) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    View full text