Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 50, Issue 2, November 2005, Pages 247-254
Lung Cancer

Oral temozolomide in heavily pre-treated brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: Phase II study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.05.026Get rights and content

Summary

Introduction:

The primary tumour type most likely to metastasize to the brain is lung cancer. In heavily pre-treated patients, limited therapeutic option is available and the results of availability therapies reported in literature are disappointing. The present phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of temozolomide (TMZ) as palliative treatment for brain metastases (BrM) in NSCLC patients pre-treated with WBRT and at least one line of chemotherapy for metastatic brain disease.

Material and methods:

Temozolomide was administered orally at 150 mg/mq/day for five consecutive days for the first cycle, doses were increased to 200 mg/mq/day for 5 days every 28 days for subsequent cycles if no grade 3/4 haematological toxicity was observed. Eligibility criteria included cytological or histological confirmed NSCLC; BrM, recurrent or progressing after WBRT and at least one line of chemotherapy. A total of 30 consecutive patients entered the study and received the allocated treatment.

Results:

Three patients (10%) achieved an objective response (OR) of BrM with two complete remission. Stable disease and progressive disease were achieved in 3 (10%) and 24 patients (80%), respectively. A correlation between response to TMZ and sensitivity to the previous first line chemotherapy was reported. Time to progression and overall survival were examined both for responder patients and for all included patients. For long-term survivors, we considered the patients who survived >12 months after the start of TMZ. According to this definition, three patients resulted long-term survivors: 2 with OR and 1 with stable brain disease. No grades 3 or 4 toxicity occurred. The total of treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate (G1-2) in intensity. No patients discontinued TMZ as a result of treatment-related toxicity.

Discussion:

The results of the present trial clearly demonstrates that TMZ is active and safe in BrM NSCLC patients previously treated with WBRT and at least one line of chemotherapy.

Introduction

Among intra-cranial tumours, brain metastases (BrM) are more common than primary brain tumours. The primary tumour type most likely to metastasize to the brain is lung cancer. Among patients affected by advanced NSCLC up to 40% have BrM identifiable at autopsy [1]. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) improves neurological symptoms in about 50% of patients and lengthens the median survival from 3 to 6 months [2]. Recent trials suggest that epipodophillotoxins alone or combined with cisplatin are very effective in treating NSCLC-related BrM and ifosfamide–mitomycin–cisplatin or gemcitabine–cisplatin combinations have been evaluated with similar good responses [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Temozolomide (TMZ) is a novel, oral, alkylating agent with virtually 100% bioavailability [10], [11], [12]. It is a new class of second generation imidazotetrazine pro-drugs that undergoes spontaneous conversion under physiological conditions to the active alkylating agent-MTIC, thus not requiring hepatic metabolism to become active. It crosses the blood–brain barrier and has showed activity in heavily pre-treated patients affected by BrM from NSCLC [10], [11], [12]. Concentrations of the drug in the central nervous system reach approximately 30–40% of plasma concentrations and clearance of TMZ is unaffected by co-administration with anticonvulsivants, antiemetics or dexamethasone. TMZ also has a good toxicity profile. The dose-limiting toxicity is not cumulative myelosuppression that rarely requires treatment delay or dose reduction.

The present phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of TMZ as palliative treatment for recurrent or progressing BrM in NSCLC patients pre-treated with WBRT and at least one line of chemotherapy for metastatic brain disease.

Section snippets

Patients eligibility

Eligibility criteria included cytological or histological confirmed NSCLC; BrM, in progression after WBRT and at least one previous line of chemotherapy for metastatic brain disease. Patients were also required to have evaluable or measurable brain disease assessed by CT or MRI scans, age between 18 and 80 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2 and a life expectance >3 months. Bone marrow function requirements included an absolute neutrophil count ≥1500 mm−3, a

Patient characteristics

The demographic and baseline disease characteristics of the evaluable patients are listed in Table 3.

A total of 30 consecutive patients entered the study and received the allocated treatment from October 2000 to July 2003. All patients were pre-treated with WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions of 300 cGy) and at least one line of chemotherapy for metastatic brain disease (18/30 and 5/30 of patients with second and third line of chemotherapy, respectively, for metastatic disease, regardless of brain

Discussion

Brain metastases from NSCLC are associated with poor prognosis despite aggressive treatment. Also, the majority of patients suffer debilitating neurological symptoms. The optimal treatment for patients with BrM continues to evolve. The recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group brain metastases trials identified three prognostic classes with median survival of 2.3 months (RPA Class III) to 7.1 months (RPA Class I). [15] Although WBRT

References (32)

  • J.T. Sundstrom et al.

    Prognosis of patients treated for intracranial metastases with whole brain irradiation

    Ann Med

    (1998)
  • L. Crinò et al.

    Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III study of the Italian lung cancer project

    J Clin Oncol

    (1999)
  • A. Fujita et al.

    Combination chemotherapy of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and irinotecan with rhG-CSF support in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

    Oncology

    (2000)
  • G. Bernardo et al.

    First line chemotherapy with vinorelbine, gemcitabine and carboplatin in the treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

    Cancer Invest

    (2002)
  • V. Franciosi et al.

    Front-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide for patients with brain metastases from breast carcinoma, nonsmall cell lung carcinoma or malignant melanoma

    Cancer

    (1999)
  • X. Quantin et al.

    Concomitant brain radiotherapy and vinorelbine–ifosfamide–cisplatin chemotherapy in brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer

    Lung Cancer

    (1999)
  • Cited by (68)

    • Neurological complications of lung cancer

      2022, Neurological Complications of Systemic Cancer and Antineoplastic Therapy
    • Emerging treatment paradigms for brain metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer: An overview of the current landscape and challenges ahead

      2017, Annals of Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Temozolomide, an alkylating agent, can penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in therapeutic concentrations (49). Intracranial RR ranging from 0% to 10% with temozolomide alone has been observed (50,51). The TACTIC study evaluated the role of erlotinib with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases which were predominantly EGFR wild type (52).

    • The evolving clinical management of cerebral metastases

      2017, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cisplatin regimes show a similar overall median survival in those with only extracranial metastatic disease compared to with brain metastases suggesting similarities in the chemosensitivity of the intracranial disease to that of primary tumour.86,87 Temozolamide, which has been widely shown to improve survival in primary brain tumours, gives an objective increase in response rate but no additional survival benefit in NSCLC.88–90 EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib and gefitinib) may offer a new possibility of frontline management for patients with brain metastases.

    • Systemic Treatment of Brain Metastases

      2017, Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the larger of the two studies, which enrolled 41 patients and including 22 with NSCLC, 2 patients (9%) had a partial response (PR).28 A second study investigated temozolomide in 30 patients with NSCLC with progression of brain metastases after at least 1 line of chemotherapy and WBRT.29 The dose of temozolomide was escalated to 200 mg/m2/d with subsequent cycles if no grade 3 or grade 4 hematologic toxicities were observed.

    • The impact of brain metastasis on quality of life, resource utilization and survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

      2016, Cancer Treatment Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      This review discusses articles either exclusively conducted in NSCLC populations or, in the absence of sufficient studies, those with at least 50% of the study population consisting of NSCLC patients (Table 2) [11–48]. A total of 21 clinical trials with exclusively NSCLC populations with brain metastases were identified from the searches [12–14,16–27,30–35]. Overall, it appeared that OS was longer with WBRT-based regimens than with chemotherapy; molecularly targeted therapies also reported promising OS, often higher than reported in WBRT regimes (Table 3).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text