ReviewThe proteasomal system
Introduction
To maintain the cellular functionality and viability, it is important to subject proteins to a defined turnover. In order to realize this, damaged, modified, misfolded proteins or proteins that have become‘ unnecessary must be recognized and degraded. During evolution several systems have developed for this purpose, including the proteasomal system, which is the most important of them, at least in the cytosol. The proteasomal system consists of the 20S “core” proteasome and a set of regulator proteins that can change its activities and specificities. In this review we will describe the current knowledge on structure and assembly of the proteasome its intracellular functions and its role in pathologies.
For simplicity in the following manuscript, the 20S “core” proteasome will be termed as “proteasome”. All other forms will be termed according to the attached regulators.
Section snippets
The 20S proteasome
The 20S “core” proteasome is the main particle of the proteasomal system, a very complex cellular structure involved in the proteolytic degradation of oxidized proteins, life-span regulation of proteins (Dick et al., 1991, Grune et al., 1996, Takeuchi and Toh-e, 1997, Sitte et al., 1998, Friguet et al., 2000, Davies, 2001), protein “quality control” (Schmitz and Herzog, 2004, Lord et al., 2000, Plemper and Wolf, 1999, Hampton, 2002, Brodsky and McCracken, 1999), cell cycle regulation (Takeuchi
Regulation of the 20S proteasome
The highly effective protein degradation machinery of the proteasome must be strictly regulated in order to prevent the uncontrolled degradation of cellular proteins. Therefore, several regulators evolved in order to control the proteasomal recognition and degradation of substrate proteins. The gating of the 20S proteasome requires a regulated entrance of substrates into the proteasome and, there, a controlled opening of the α-rings. Hydrophobic proteins are perhaps able to open the α-subunit
Proteasome and transcription factor degradation
Posttranslational modification of proteins plays an important role in the transcriptional regulation in cells and causes, therefore, changes in gene expressions. Such modifications include phosphorylation or dephosphorylation as reversible processes (Hunter and Karin, 1992) or proteolysis as an irreversible process. Proteasomal degradation regulates numerous transcriptional factors including NFκB, p53, c-jun, β-catenin, E2F-1 and consequently activates or inactivates related gene expression.
Conclusion
As shown in the present review, it is very difficult to find an aspect of cellular life, function or pathology not involving the proteasomal system. The importance of the UPS for the functionality of the cell plays a role hardly to overestimate. Taking into account that early in evolution, like in archaebacteria as T. acidophilum, this system developed, demonstrates that recognition and removal of non-necessary or damaged proteins from a living cell has been required almost from the origins of
Acknowledgement
We thank the The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey and COST B35 for the support.
References (1416)
- et al.
Potent and selective inhibitors of the proteasome: dipeptidyl boronic acids
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
(1998) - et al.
In vivo characterization of the proteasome regulator PA28
J. Biol. Chem.
(1996) - et al.
Structure and dynamics of membrane-associated ICP47, a viral inhibitor of the MHC I antigen-processing machinery
J. Biol. Chem.
(2006) - et al.
Processive degradation of proteins and other catalytic properties of the proteasome from Thermoplasma acidophilum
J. Biol. Chem.
(1997) - et al.
Involvement of the p97-Ufd1-Npl4 complex in the regulated endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors
J. Biol. Chem.
(2005) - et al.
Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
(2004) - et al.
Peroxynitrite-induced oxidation and its effects on isolated proteasomal systems
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
(2003) - et al.
M-30 and 4HNE are sequestered in different aggresomes in the same hepatocytes
Exp. Mol. Pathol.
(2007) Clinical update: novel targets in multiple myeloma
Semin. Oncol.
(2004)Targeted therapy of multiple myeloma based upon tumor-microenvironmental interactions
Exp. Hematol.
(2007)