Review
What are nuclear receptor ligands?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2010.06.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are a family of highly conserved transcription factors that regulate transcription in response to small lipophilic compounds. They play a role in every aspect of development, physiology and disease in humans. They are also ubiquitous in and unique to the animal kingdom suggesting that they may have played an important role in their evolution. In contrast to the classical endocrine receptors that originally defined the family, recent studies suggest that the first NRs might have been sensors of their environment, binding ligands that were external to the host organism. The purpose of this review is to provide a broad perspective on NR ligands and address the issue of exactly what constitutes a NR ligand from historical, biological and evolutionary perspectives. This discussion will lay the foundation for subsequent reviews in this issue as well as pose new questions for future investigation.

Introduction

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are proteins that share considerable amino acid sequence similarity in two highly conserved domains – the DNA binding (DBD) and the ligand binding domains (LBD) (Renaud and Moras, 2000). As their names indicate, these domains are responsible for binding specific DNA sequences and small lipophilic ligands, respectively. The DBD in the N-terminal half of the protein is comprised of two zinc-binding motifs that each coordinate a zinc ion through four precisely positioned cysteines. The LBD in the C-terminal half consists of a series of ∼12 alpha helices that create a hydrophobic pocket that can bind a hydrophobic ligand (Fig. 1A). NRs bind specific DNA response elements in the regulatory regions of genes and regulate transcription in response to ligand binding by recruiting co-regulatory molecules that subsequently modify the chromatin and contact the basal transcription machinery (Fig. 1B) (Gronemeyer et al., 2004, Rosenfeld et al., 2006). Examples of classical NRs include estrogen (ER, NR3A), progesterone (PR, NR3C3), androgen (AR, NR3C4), glucocorticoid (NR3C1), Vitamin A (RAR, NR1B), Vitamin D (VDR, NR1I1) and thyroid hormone (TR, NR1A) receptors. While there are an increasing number of examples of NRs playing non-genomic roles at the plasma and other membranes, this review will concentrate on the role and definition of the ligands only in their nuclear capacity; it is in that capacity that we have the greatest understanding of NR action, and yet even that understanding is far from complete.

Section snippets

Evolutionary origins of NRs

NR genes are present and expressed in some of the simplest animal organisms. They are absent, however, in fungi, plants and choanoflagellates, the closest known relatives of metazoans (King et al., 2008). Therefore, they appear to have arrived on the evolutionary scene ∼635 million years (Myr) ago when animals first appeared in the fossil record (Fig. 2). They have also been associated with the Cambrian explosion – the massive diversification from relatively simple, primarily unicellular

Historical perspective of NR Ligands

Our current concept of what NR ligands are and what they do comes primarily from studies on a relatively few receptor·ligand pairs from man and related mammals. The reason for the anthropocentric bias of NR ligands is an obvious, and practical, one. Most of the first full length NRs cDNAs were cloned from human within a three-year time frame between 1985 and 1987 (GR, PR, ER, VDR, TR, RAR, and mineralcorticoid (MR, NR3C2)); these receptors subsequently defined the steroid and thyroid hormone

Biological perspective of NR ligands

The word “ligand” comes from the Latin ligare which means “to bind.” Whereas in inorganic chemistry a ligand is an atom or molecule that binds a metal, in biochemistry and pharmacology a ligand is defined as a substance that is able to bind to and form a complex with a biomolecule to serve a biological purpose, such as heme binding to myoglobin. This definition is much simpler than the classical notion of a NR ligand as one that induces a conformation change that triggers a cascade of events.

Evolutionary perspective of NR ligands

From an evolutionary perspective, the notion of NR ligands as signaling molecules that help recruit co-regulatory molecules requires that at least some of those co-regulatory molecules (e.g., p300/CBP, GRIP1/SRC, PGC1, SMRT, N-CoR, SWI/SNF, Mediator, etc.) be present in the organisms in which the first ligand-dependent NR arose. This appears to be the case. Whereas several co-regulatory molecules were first identified as interacting with NRs (e.g., GRIP1/SRC, PGC1, SMRT, N-CoR), they are now

Environmental sensors vs. endocrine receptors

The first NRs identified (GR, ER, PR, VDR) were purified based on their ability to bind their respective ligands (Evans, 1988). Most subsequent NRs were cloned or identified via sequence similarity to these first receptors, and hence initially had no ligands associated with them. Indeed, even the retinoic acid receptor RARα (NR1B1) started out as an orphan; although by the end of the original paper describing its cloning retinoic acid had been identified as a ligand (Giguere et al., 1987).

Criteria for NR ligand designation

Having broadened our notion of what constitutes a NR ligand, we must now decide on the precise criteria that should be used to classify a compound as a NR ligand. This will be an increasingly important issue as an increasing number of NRs are identified in newly sequenced genomes of all types of organisms. I propose that we use the simplest, least restrictive definition possible – i.e., that the compound bind the NR. The next criterion would be that the compound bind in the ligand binding

Summary and future directions

While the anthropocentric, pharmacological approach of the past 25 years has without a doubt been instrumental in characterizing in great detail this family of key transcriptional regulators, it is now time to consider NRs and their ligands from an evolutionary perspective. Remarkable advances have been made in our understanding of the evolutionary origins of life on Earth in recent years, in terms of both traditional paleontology and paleobiology (e.g., molecular fossils, genomic evolution).

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to M. Maduro for discussions on organismal development and B. Fang for drawing ligand structures. The Sladek lab is supported by NIH grants R01 DK053892 and R21 MH087397.

References (103)

  • K. Duda et al.

    Structural basis for HNF-4alpha activation by ligand and coactivator binding

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • L.C. Grasso et al.

    The evolution of nuclear receptors: evidence from the coral Acropora

    Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.

    (2001)
  • R.A. Heyman et al.

    9-cis retinoic acid is a high affinity ligand for the retinoid X receptor

    Cell

    (1992)
  • H.A. Ingraham et al.

    Orphan nuclear receptors adopted by crystallography

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (2005)
  • J. Kovac et al.

    A time to fast, a time to feast: the crosstalk between metabolism and the circadian clock

    Mol. Cell

    (2009)
  • I.N. Krylova et al.

    Structural analyses reveal phosphatidyl inositols as ligands for the NR5 orphan receptors SF-1 and LRH-1

    Cell

    (2005)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Crystallographic identification and functional characterization of phospholipids as ligands for the orphan nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor-1

    Mol. Cell

    (2005)
  • G.V. Markov et al.

    The evolution of the ligand/receptor couple: a long road from comparative endocrinology to comparative genomics

    Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.

    (2008)
  • D.L. Motola et al.

    Identification of ligands for DAF-12 that govern dauer formation and reproduction in C. elegans

    Cell

    (2006)
  • I.G. Schulman et al.

    The flip side: identifying small molecule regulators of nuclear receptors

    Chem. Biol.

    (2004)
  • A.K. Shiau et al.

    The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen

    Cell

    (1998)
  • F. Sladek

    Desperately seeking something

    Mol. Cell

    (2002)
  • A.E. Sluder et al.

    Nuclear receptors in nematodes: themes and variations

    Trends Genet

    (2001)
  • A.N. Urs et al.

    Steroidogenic factor-1 is a sphingolipid binding protein

    Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.

    (2007)
  • N.J. Webster et al.

    The hormone-binding domains of the estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors contain an inducible transcription activation function

    Cell

    (1988)
  • G.B. Wisely et al.

    Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 is a transcription factor that constitutively binds fatty acids

    Structure

    (2002)
  • W. Wu et al.

    1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) antiproliferative actions involve vitamin D receptor-mediated activation of MAPK pathways and AP-1/p21(waf1) upregulation in human osteosarcoma

    Cancer Lett.

    (2007)
  • P. Abad et al.

    Genome sequence of the metazoan plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (2008)
  • S. Al-Moghrabi et al.

    Fatty acids of the scleractinian coral Galaxea fascicularis: effect of light and feeding

    J. Comp. Physiol. B

    (1995)
  • S.L. Baldauf et al.
  • S. Bertrand et al.

    Evolutionary genomics of nuclear receptors: from twenty-five ancestral genes to derived endocrine systems

    Mol. Biol. Evol.

    (2004)
  • S. Bertrand et al.

    Unexpected novel relational links uncovered by extensive developmental profiling of nuclear receptor expression

    PLoS Genet.

    (2007)
  • E. Bolotin et al.

    Integrated approach for the identification of human hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha target genes using protein binding microarrays

    Hepatology

    (2009)
  • J.T. Bridgham et al.

    Evolution of hormone-receptor complexity by molecular exploitation

    Science

    (2006)
  • J.J. Brocks et al.

    Unravelling ancient microbial history with community proteogenomics and lipid geochemistry

    Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

    (2009)
  • J.J. Brocks et al.

    Archean molecular fossils and the early rise of eukaryotes

    Science

    (1999)
  • T.P. Burris

    Nuclear hormone receptors for heme: REV-ERBalpha and REV-ERBbeta are ligand-regulated components of the mammalian clock

    Mol. Endocrinol.

    (2008)
  • S.M. Carroll et al.

    Evolution of hormone signaling in elasmobranchs by exploitation of promiscuous receptors

    Mol. Biol. Evol.

    (2008)
  • M.V. Chakravarthy et al.

    Identification of a physiologically relevant endogenous ligand for PPARalpha in liver

    Cell

    (2009)
  • W. Cornell et al.

    Steroid hormone binding receptors: application of homology modeling, induced fit docking, and molecular dynamics to study structure-function relationships

    Curr. Top. Med. Chem.

    (2009)
  • J.E. Cronan et al.

    The presence of linoleic acid in Escherichia coli cannot be confirmed

    J. Bacteriol.

    (1994)
  • P.B. Danielson

    The cytochrome P450 superfamily: biochemistry, evolution and drug metabolism in humans

    Curr. Drug Metab.

    (2002)
  • H. Escriva et al.

    The evolution of the nuclear receptor superfamily

    Essays Biochem.

    (2004)
  • H. Escriva et al.

    Ligand binding and nuclear receptor evolution

    Bioessays

    (2000)
  • R.M. Evans

    The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily

    Science

    (1988)
  • B.M. Forman et al.

    Hypolipidemic drugs, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and eicosanoids are ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and delta

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1997)
  • O.S. Gardner et al.

    Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands: an example of nongenomic signaling

    Mol. Pharmacol.

    (2005)
  • E. Ghedin et al.

    Draft genome of the filarial nematode parasite Brugia malayi

    Science

    (2007)
  • V. Giguere et al.

    Identification of a receptor for the morphogen retinoic acid

    Nature

    (1987)
  • A.G. Gilman et al.

    Pharmacodynamics: mechanisms of drug action and the relationship between drug concentration and effect

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text