Elsevier

Medical Image Analysis

Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2009, Pages 297-311
Medical Image Analysis

Simulation of brain tumors in MR images for evaluation of segmentation efficacy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2008.11.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Obtaining validation data and comparison metrics for segmentation of magnetic resonance images (MRI) are difficult tasks due to the lack of reliable ground truth. This problem is even more evident for images presenting pathology, which can both alter tissue appearance through infiltration and cause geometric distortions. Systems for generating synthetic images with user-defined degradation by noise and intensity inhomogeneity offer the possibility for testing and comparison of segmentation methods. Such systems do not yet offer simulation of sufficiently realistic looking pathology. This paper presents a system that combines physical and statistical modeling to generate synthetic multi-modal 3D brain MRI with tumor and edema, along with the underlying anatomical ground truth, Main emphasis is placed on simulation of the major effects known for tumor MRI, such as contrast enhancement, local distortion of healthy tissue, infiltrating edema adjacent to tumors, destruction and deformation of fiber tracts, and multi-modal MRI contrast of healthy tissue and pathology. The new method synthesizes pathology in multi-modal MRI and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) by simulating mass effect, warping and destruction of white matter fibers, and infiltration of brain tissues by tumor cells. We generate synthetic contrast enhanced MR images by simulating the accumulation of contrast agent within the brain. The appearance of the the brain tissue and tumor in MRI is simulated by synthesizing texture images from real MR images. The proposed method is able to generate synthetic ground truth and synthesized MR images with tumor and edema that exhibit comparable segmentation challenges to real tumor MRI. Such image data sets will find use in segmentation reliability studies, comparison and validation of different segmentation methods, training and teaching, or even in evaluating standards for tumor size like the RECIST criteria (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors).

Introduction

The segmentation of brain tumor from magnetic resonance (MR) images is a vital process for treatment planning, monitoring of therapy, examining efficacy of radiation and drug treatments, and studying the differences of healthy subjects and subjects with tumor. The process of automatically extracting tumors from MR images is a challenging process. This leads to many different approaches for automatic tumor segmentation (Clark et al., 1998, Kaus et al., 2001, Prastawa et al., 2004). The usual standard used for validating segmentation results of the automatic methods is the manual segmentation results done by human experts. However, different investigators are likely to employ different image acquisition parameters and different manual segmentation techniques. A compounding issue is that any manual segmentation method suffers from lack of reliability and reproducibility. Even if a rich set of manual segmentations are available, they may not reflect the ground truth and the true gold standard may need to be estimated (Warfield et al., 2004). Furthermore, validation is typically not performed for the segmentations of non-tumor structures since manual segmentations of edema and the healthy brain tissue are very challenging tasks and have a high degree of variability.

Brain MRI exhibiting tumor is difficult to segment due to a combination of the following factors:

  • The deformation of brain tissue due to tumor mass effect or volume expansion.

  • The infiltration of brain tissue by tumor and edema (swelling). Edema appears around tumor mainly in the white matter regions and may also contain infiltrative tumor cells.

  • The gradual transition between tumor, edema, and surrounding brain tissue. This results in the ambiguity of the structural boundaries.

  • The T1w MRI with contrast enhancement, typically using a gadolinium agent, is the standard modality for identifying tumors. This modality results in active tumor tissue appearing with bright intensity. Unfortunately, blood vessels also appear bright while parts of tumor that are necrotic do not have higher levels of intensity. Therefore, the information provided by the intensities in this modality is not always consistent, and it is generally impossible to segment the tumor by thresholding the intensities in this image modality.

In order to provide objective assessments of segmentation performance, there is a need for an objective 3D ground truth with associated MR images that exhibit the same major segmentation challenges as that of common, realistic scans of a tumor patient. A database of real brain tumor MR images, along with their segmentations, may provide the means to measure the performance of an algorithm by comparing the results against the variability of the expert raters’ judgements. However, an objective evaluation to systematically compare different methodologies also needs a ground truth with little or no variability. An example of such a ground truth is the synthetic brain MRI database provided by the Montreal Neurological Institute1 that is currently considered to be the common standard for evaluating the segmentations of healthy brain MR images. For this purpose, we propose a method that generates realistic looking MR images with the associated ground truth by approximating the brain tumor generation process.

Rexilius et al. (2004) proposed a framework for generating digital brain phantoms with tumor. They used a biomechanical linear elastic finite element model to simulate the tumor mass effect. In their method, the MRI of a healthy subject is deformed and a tumor structure from a real subject is inserted into the MRI. Their model for edema is computed from the distances to the tumor boundary and the white matter mask. This is insufficient to simulate real edema infiltration properties since infiltration can occur in regions away from tumor. Such regions are typically connected through white matter fibers. The framework of Rexilius et al. only considered contrast enhancement inside tumors, without contrast enhancement of blood vessels.

Models for brain tumor expansion and edema have been proposed by Nagashima et al., 1990a, Clatz et al., 2004, Clatz et al., 2005, Mohamed and Davatzikos, 2005, Mohamed et al., 2006. More recently, Clatz et al. developed a realistic tumor growth model that explicitly simulates the main effects of tumor growth (mass effect and infiltration) using simple computational models. Clatz et al. used a linearized biomechanical finite element model to simulate mass effect and they used a reaction–diffusion process that is modulated by the diffusion tensor field to simulate the infiltration by tumor cells and edema. The simple computational models used by Clatz et al. are ideal for generating realistic tumor models in an efficient manner. We propose a method for generating new pathological ground truth by applying their mass effect and infiltration model to a well defined ground truth for normal brains. Additionally, we propose to extend the Clatz et al. model by using random pressure directions, and by simulating the effect of volume expansion on the white matter fibers by warping the diffusion tensors and making them more isotropic depending on the magnitude of local deformations.

We develop a method for generating realistic-appearing contrast enhanced T1 weighted MR images (a standard modality for diagnosis) by simulating the accumulation of contrast agents in the brain. The corresponding multi-modal MR images (contrast enhanced T1w, T1w, and T2) are generated from the simulated ground truth and from textures that are synthesized using samples of real tumor MRI data. Fig. 1 shows an overview of the proposed method. Our method is capable of generating 3D whole brain ground truth that exhibits the primary effects of tumor on normal brains, along with simulated multi-modal MR images that are challenging to segment.

The proposed method does not attempt to simulate the complete process of real tumor growth and the true MR image generation process. Instead, our aim is to generate a database of synthetic brain tumor MR images that have similar challenges for segmentation as in real tumors, along with the associated anatomical ground truth. The simulated brain tumor MR images can function as test data for any segmentation method and the ground truth can provide the means for objective assessment of segmentation performance. We do not aim to create a database of simulated brain tumor MR images that are indistinguishable from real brain tumor MR images. Such an effort requires the faithful modeling of the anatomical, chemical, and vascular changes in the brain due to tumor. It would also require the exact formulation of what neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons define as tumor. Currently, this definition involves a large degree of intuition and cannot be formulated algorithmically. Our simulated data provides a standard benchmark for different tumor segmentation methods that is currently not available to the community.

Section snippets

Generation of pathological ground truth

Tumor and edema growth involves many concurrently occurring processes. As proposed by Wasserman et al. (1996), the growth model may involve biomechanics, nutrient distribution, and metabolic processes. Since our goal is not to model tumor growth per se, we have chosen to simplify the model and use three separate sequential processes for efficiency, as shown in Fig. 2. First, we simulate the deformation that is due to tumor mass effect using a biomechanical model. It is then followed by the

Generation of MR images

For the purpose of validating segmentation methods, we need a set of synthetic MR images that appear reasonably realistic and that correspond to the 3D pathological ground truth. These images serve as test data for the evaluation of segmentation methods. The generation of synthetic tumor MRI involves the simulation of two processes: contrast enhancement in T1w MRI due to the use of contrast agents (the standard modality for tumor diagnosis), and generation of intensity patterns similar to those

Results

We generated five synthetic MR datasets with varying tumor location, tumor count, levels of tumor expansion, and extent of edema. Fig. 8, Fig. 9 show MR images of observed clinical cases that demonstrate the true variations of tumor appearance. The five synthetic brain tumor MRI datasets with similar variations are shown in Fig. 10, Fig. 11. SimTumor001 shows a tumor with significant mass effect and large surrounding edema. SimTumor002 shows a tumor that displaces the right ventricle from below

Discussion and conclusions

We presented a new method for generating modified ground truth with tumor and edema from a normal brain ground truth, along with a method for generating synthetic multi-modal MR images that present similar segmentation challenges as real tumor MRI. The process for generating a synthetic brain tumor dataset is summarized in Fig. 14. Our proposed simulation scheme introduces a tensor model for the warping and destruction of white matter fibers (demyelination). The scheme also introduces a

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Sarang Joshi (University of Utah) and Stephen Pizer (University of North Carolina) for providing useful feedback on parts of the manuscript, and the maintainers and contributors of the open source packages Insight Toolkit (Kitware, 2008a) and Visualization Toolkit (Kitware, 2008b) for providing the framework for the software system described in this paper.

References (42)

  • E. Bullitt et al.

    Measuring tortuosity of the intracerebral vasculature from MRA images

    IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging

    (2003)
  • M.C. Clark et al.

    Automatic tumor-segmentation using knowledge-based techniques

    IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging

    (1998)
  • Clatz, O., Bondiau, P.-Y., Delingette, H., Malandain, G., Sermesant, M., Warfield, S.K., Ayache, N., 2004. In silico...
  • O. Clatz et al.

    Realistic simulation of the 3D growth of brain tumors in MR images including diffusion and mass effect

    IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging

    (2005)
  • C.A. Cocosco et al.

    BrainWeb: Online interface to a 3D MRI simulated brain database

    NeuroImage

    (1997)
  • L.R. Dice

    Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species

    Ecology

    (1945)
  • M. Ferrant et al.

    Registration of 3D interoperative MR images of the brain using finite element biomechanical model

    IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging

    (2001)
  • G. Gerig et al.

    VALMET: A new validation tool for assessing and improving 3D object segmentation

  • M.E. Gurtin

    An Introduction to Continuum Mechanics

    (1981)
  • Ho, S., Bullitt, E., Gerig, G., 2002. Level set evolution with region competition: Automatic 3-D segmentation of brain...
  • T.J.R. Hughes

    The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis

    (2000)
  • Cited by (120)

    • Towards effective machine learning in medical imaging analysis: A novel approach and expert evaluation of high-grade glioma ‘ground truth’ simulation on MRI

      2021, International Journal of Medical Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such datasets however are labour-intensive and time-consuming to create and subjective with ground-truth labels being manually created, while still insufficient to meet the increasing need for data in machine learning studies, e.g., brain tumour deep learning [15–17]. An alternative approach involves creating simulated tumours on the brain MRI of healthy subjects [18–20]. In addition to the fast and automated nature, the known label of the images is advantageous.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by the NIH NIBIB under grant R01 EB000219.

    View full text