ERIC-PCR fingerprinting-based community DNA hybridization to pinpoint genome-specific fragments as molecular markers to identify and track populations common to healthy human guts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2004.06.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Bacterial populations common to healthy human guts may play important roles in human health. A new strategy for discovering genomic sequences as markers for these bacteria was developed using Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (ERIC)-PCR fingerprinting. Structural features within microbial communities are compared with ERIC-PCR followed by DNA hybridization to identify genomic fragments shared by samples from healthy human individuals. ERIC-PCR profiles of fecal samples from 12 diseased or healthy human and piglet subjects demonstrated stable, unique banding patterns for each individual tested. Sequence homology of DNA fragments in bands of identical size was examined between samples by hybridization under high stringency conditions with DIG-labeled ERIC-PCR products derived from the fecal sample of one healthy child. Comparative analysis of the hybridization profiles with the original agarose fingerprints identified three predominant bands as signatures for populations associated with healthy human guts with sizes of 500, 800 and 1000 bp. Clone library profiling of the three bands produced 17 genome fragments, three of which showed high similarity only with regions of the Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron genome, while the remainder were orphan sequences. Association of these sequences with healthy guts was validated by sequence-selective PCR experiments, which showed that a single fragment was present in all 32 healthy humans and 13 healthy piglets tested. Two fragments were present in the healthy human group and in 18 children with non-infectious diarrhea but not in eight children with infectious diarrhea. Genome fragments identified with this novel strategy may be used as genome-specific markers for dynamic monitoring and sequence-guided isolation of functionally important bacterial populations in complex communities such as human gut microflora.

Introduction

A large number of microbial species exist in the human gastrointestinal tract. Intestinal microflora play important roles in digestive function, immunity and disease resistance. However, the relationship between gut flora and human health remains largely unknown due to the complexity of the system (Hooper and Gordon, 2001, Mackie et al., 2000). The structure of any microbial community is central to the system's function (Dahllof, 2002). One important strategy for elucidating the structure–function relationship of microbial communities involves long-term, systematic monitoring of changes associated with functional dynamics of a community, thus leading to a better understanding of a community's ecological function(s) (Bond et al., 1995, Borneman and Triplett, 1997, Watanabe and Hino, 1996, Watanabe et al., 1998). This can be achieved by comparing structural features of communities to identify functionally important populations. However, traditional culture-based techniques are inappropriate in studying the structure–function relationship of microbial communities due to their highly selective, laborious and time-consuming nature. Only a relatively small fraction of population members in a complex natural community, such as human gastrointestinal system (Amann et al., 1995, Langendijk et al., 1995, Muyzer et al., 1993), can be recovered with culture-based techniques.

DNA-based technology has advanced the characterization of microbial structural features. Microbial communities can be regarded as a mixture of microbial genomes. Genomic DNA sequences and their copy numbers are a faithful reflection of community structure. Community structure has been defined as the amount and distribution of (genomic) information in a particular habitat (Torsvik et al., 2002). Phylogenetically meaningful sequences, such as small subunit ribosomal RNA genes, conserved functional genes and randomly amplified genome fragments, have been used as molecular markers in analyzing microbial communities with different technical strategies, such as clone library profiling, genetic fingerprinting and molecular hybridization (Franklin et al., 1999, Hill et al., 2002, Rotthauwe et al., 1997, Suau et al., 1999, Wikstroim et al., 1999, Wu et al., 2001). The genomic DNA-based analysis has overcome limitations of conventional culture-based technology and provided the most powerful tool for researching structure–function relationships of microbial communities.

The structural dynamics of microbial communities have been monitored using amplified sequences or total genomic DNA and a variety of genetic fingerprinting techniques, such as Terminal Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP), Amplified Ribosome DNA Restriction Analysis (ARDRA), Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis/Temperature Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE/TGGE), of amplified partial 16S/18S rDNAs or fragments of conserved functional genes and Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), or Arbitrarily Primed PCR (AP-PCR) (Liu et al., 1997, Marsh, 1999, Muyzer et al., 1993, Norris et al., 2002, Simpson et al., 1999, Tannock, 2002, Weidner et al., 1996, Zoetendal et al., 1998). These techniques provide genomic patterns or profiles of microbial communities, in which the number of bands reflects the number of predominant community members, while the intensity of bands theoretically reflects population levels. However, bands with identical positions in TGGE/DGGE or RAPD gels may contain different DNA sequences (Jackson et al., 2000, Sekiguchi et al., 2001), making it difficult to compare structural features of different community samples based solely on the banding patterns. Thus, the scoring of different samples using PCR-TGGE/DGGE or RAPD profiles may exaggerate the similarity between the samples.

In this study, we developed a new strategy to simultaneously compare sequence-based structural features of large numbers of community samples. Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (ERIC)-PCR was used to fingerprint the microbial community of fecal samples of research subjects. ERIC-PCR profiles were transfer blotted onto nylon film to form an array-like organization made of amplified genomic DNA fragments distributed to reflect community structural differences. All ERIC-PCR amplicons from one community sample were DIG-labeled to hybridize with the community DNA arrays. DNA bands in the fingerprints sharing sequence homology with the probes would develop signals, while bands with no sequence homology in the probes would be “erased” from the fingerprints. This led to a straightforward identification of the common bands containing homologous sequences among all the samples. If the appearance of these bands in the community samples were associated with a certain functional status, cloning and sequencing of DNA fragments in these bands would provide the basis for designing specific primers or probes for dynamic monitoring and sequence-guided isolation of the corresponding functional populations.

Section snippets

Research subjects

Two groups of subjects were included in this study. Group 1 had 12 individuals designated A through L. Two 6-year-old children, designated child A and child B, were selected from 300 local kindergarten children as the primary subjects for this work. The body mass index (BMI=weight (kg)/height (m)2 (http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/) value of A was 18.58 kg/m2, which is >95th percentile curve, and B was 13.60 kg/m2, which was <5th percentile curve. According to the CDC definition, child A was

Reproducibility and polymorphism of ERIC-PCR profiles of fecal samples from different subjects

To examine the possible effects of DNA preparation on the reproducibility of ERIC-PCR-based community fingerprints, three different extraction methods were tested on the sub-samples of 10 fecal samples. Protocol 1 was modified from Hill et al. (2002). Protocol 2 was reported to be as efficient as the bead beating technique in recovering DNA from the fecal samples (Li et al., 2003). Protocol 3, which was simple and efficient, worked well for various bacterial and fecal samples (Wang et al., 1996

ERIC-PCR produces highly reproducible results and differentiates fingerprints not only for individual genomes but also for their mixtures

ERIC sequence was first described in E. coli, Salmonella typhimurium and other enterobacteria (Hulton et al., 1991). Two opposing primers were designed based on the 44-bp entire conserved central core inverted repeat (ERICALL) (Versalovic et al., 1991). PCR amplification of bacterial genomic DNA with this primer pair results in highly reproducible and unique banding patterns for different genomes. ERIC-PCR has since been used widely for typing of bacterial genomes based on the strain-specific

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30370031) and a grant (2001AA214131) from the High Tech Development Program of China (863 Project). The authors were grateful to Dr. Zhihua Zhou for her help in the preparation of the manuscript.

References (64)

  • J.M. Simpson et al.

    Application of denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis for the analysis of the porcine gastrointestinal microbiota

    J. Microbiol. Methods

    (1999)
  • R.I. Amann et al.

    Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation

    Microbiol. Rev.

    (1995)
  • O. Beja et al.

    Comparative genomic analysis of archaeal genotypic variants in a single population and in two different oceanic provinces

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • P.L. Bond et al.

    Bacterial community structures of phosphate-removing and non-phosphate-removing activated sludges from sequencing batch reactors

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1995)
  • J. Borneman et al.

    Molecular microbial diversity in soils from eastern Amazonia: evidence for unusual microorganisms and microbial population shifts associated with deforestation

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1997)
  • F. de Bruijn

    Use of repetitive (repetitive extragenic palindromic and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus) sequences and the polymerase chain reaction to fingerprint the genomes of Rhizobium meliloti isolates and other soil bacteria

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1992)
  • G.D. Di Giovanni et al.

    Comparison of parental and transgenic alfalfa rhizosphere bacterial communities using Biolog GN metabolic fingerprinting and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence-PCR (ERIC-PCR)

    Microb. Ecol.

    (1999)
  • G.D. Di Giovanni et al.

    Fingerprinting of mixed bacterial strains and BIOLOG Gram-negative (GN) substrate communities by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence-PCR (ERIC-PCR)

    Curr. Microbiol.

    (1999)
  • B. Drasar et al.

    Control of the large bowel microflora

  • B.A. Giesendorf et al.

    Development of species-specific DNA probes for Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Campylobacter lari by polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting

    J. Clin Microbiol.

    (1993)
  • M. Gillings et al.

    Repetitive element PCR fingerprinting (rep-PCR) using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) primers is not necessarily directed at ERIC elements

    Lett. Appl. Microbiol.

    (1997)
  • B.S. Griffiths et al.

    Broad-scale approaches to the determination of soil microbial community structure: application of the community DNA hybridization technique

    Microb. Ecol.

    (1996)
  • J.C. Harris et al.

    Fecal leukocytes in diarrheal illness

    Ann. Intern. Med.

    (1972)
  • J.E. Hill et al.

    Extensive profiling of a complex microbial community by high-throughput sequencing

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • L.V. Hooper et al.

    Commensal host–bacterial relationships in the gut

    Science

    (2001)
  • T. Hoshino et al.

    Direct detection by in situ PCR of the amoA gene in biofilm resulting from a nitrogen removal process

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2001)
  • C.S. Hulton et al.

    ERIC sequences: a novel family of repetitive elements in the genomes of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and other enterobacteria

    Mol. Microbiol.

    (1991)
  • P. Jaccard

    Nouvelles researches sur la distribution florale

    Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat.

    (1908)
  • C.R. Jackson et al.

    Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis can fail to seperate16S rDNA fragment with multiple base differences

    Mol. Biol. Today

    (2000)
  • R.W. Jernigan et al.

    Pervasive properties of the genomic signature

    BMC Genomics

    (2002)
  • S. Karlin et al.

    Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: a genomic signature

    Trends Genet.

    (1995)
  • S. Karlin et al.

    Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications

    J. Bacteriol.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Potential of a novel facultative anaerobic denitrifying Cupriavidus sp. W12 to remove fluoride and calcium through calcium bioprecipitation

      2022, Journal of Hazardous Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      After a period of culture in liquid medium, the bacteria suspension was uniformly cloudy. The 16s RNA sequence of strain W12 was compared with the established sequences in the BLAST program of NCBI, and the result shows that the similarity between strain W12 and Cupriavidus metallidurans reached 99.93% (Wei et al., 2004). As shown in Fig. 1, strain W12 was further proved to be Cupriavidus sp.

    • The Gut Microbiota and Immunopathophysiology

      2022, Comprehensive Pharmacology
    • Effects of broad-spectrum antibiotics on the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of ginsenoside Rb1: A study on rats' gut microflora influenced by lincomycin

      2014, Journal of Ethnopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      All samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis. The total DNA was isolated from the fecal samples following the protocol from Wei et al. (2004) with some modification (Peng et al., 2007, 2009). Bacterial 16S rRNA gene V3 region was amplified by PCR using primers P3-GC-f (5′-CGCCCGCCGCGCGCGGCGGGCGGGGGGGGCACGGGGGGCC TACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and P2-r (5′‐ ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG‐3′).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text