Note
Rapid quantification of bacterial cells in potable water using a simplified microfluidic device

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2006.11.003Get rights and content

Abstract

A simplified microfluidic device for quantification of bacteria in potable water was fabricated and examined. Comparisons of counts of Escherichia coli by the microfluidic system and by epifluorescence microscopy closely correlated (r2 = 0.99). Bacteria in natural mineral water and in purified household tap water were accurately enumerated by using this system within 15 min after fluorescent staining.

References (30)

  • A.Y. Fu et al.

    An integrated microfabricated cell sorter

    Anal. Chem.

    (2002)
  • S. Gawad et al.

    Micromachined impedance spectroscopy flow cytometer for cell analysis and particle sizing

    Lab Chip

    (2001)
  • J.E. Hobbie et al.

    Use of nucleopore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1977)
  • J.W. Hong et al.

    Integration of gene amplification and capillary gel electrophoresis on a polydimethylsiloxane-glass hybrid microchip

    Electrophoresis

    (2001)
  • K.-I. Inatomi et al.

    Application of a microfluidic device for counting of bacteria

    Lett. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Microfluidics and materials for smart water monitoring: A review

      2021, Analytica Chimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since bacteria, parasites and pathogens are presented in very low numbers in potable water, large volumes of water need to be condensed and to reach the threshold of detection for current detection methods. This is a limitation of the existing technology, therefore multiple methods, including force spectroscopy [85], cytometry [86], laser scattering [73], electrochemical [87] and electrophoresis [17] were adopted by microfluidic technology to overcome the extremely low number of bacteria or pollutants to be analyzed in the sample. Another approach to improve detection is to exploit the intrinsic electrical properties of bacteria by the combination of two electrical techniques such as dielectrophoresis (DEP) and impedance measurements [88].

    • Era of nano-lab-on-a-chip (LOC) technology

      2020, Handbook on Miniaturization in Analytical Chemistry: Application of Nanotechnology
    • Microfluidics technique for food quality evaluation

      2019, Evaluation Technologies for Food Quality
    • Electrochemically engineered nanoporous photonic crystal structures for optical sensing and biosensing

      2019, Handbook of Nanomaterials in Analytical Chemistry: Modern Trends in Analysis
    • Micro total analysis systems with nanomaterials

      2019, Handbook of Nanomaterials in Analytical Chemistry: Modern Trends in Analysis
    • Beverage spoilage yeast detection methods and control technologies: A review of Brettanomyces

      2018, International Journal of Food Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another option proposed is the use of microscopy in microfluidic devices. For example, Sakamoto et al. (2007) proposed a microfluidic system by using epifluorescence microscopy, for Escherichia coli bacteria quantification in water with a high correlation (r2 = 0.99). Finally, based on flow cytometry method, Jha et al. (2011) suggested a microfluidic device for accurately monitoring bacteria levels in aqueous samples, which has the potential to be a low-cost rapid detection method using nanolitre samples and provides a rapid, quantitative assay.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text