NoteRapid quantification of bacterial cells in potable water using a simplified microfluidic device
References (30)
- et al.
Modular concept of a laboratory on a chip for chemical and biochemical analysis
Biosens. Bioelectron.
(1998) - et al.
Microbiological safety of natural mineral water
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
(2002) - et al.
Environmental microbiology-on-a-chip and its future impacts
Trends Biotechnol
(2005) - et al.
A review of recent activities in the NASA CELSS program
Adv. Space Res.
(1987) The Mini-Earth facility and present status of habitation experiment program
Adv. Space Res.
(2005)- et al.
Current and future application of flow cytometry in aquatic microbiology
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
(2000) - et al.
Continuous concentration of bacteria in a microfluidic flow cell using electrokinetic techniques
Electrophoresis
(2001) - et al.
Flow cytometry and cell sorting of heterogeneous microbial populations: the importance of single-cell analyses
Microbiol. Rev.
(1996) - et al.
Total counts, culturable and viable, and non-culturable microflora of a French mineral water: a case study
J. Appl. Microbiol.
(1999) - et al.
Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane)
Anal. Chem.
(1998)
An integrated microfabricated cell sorter
Anal. Chem.
Micromachined impedance spectroscopy flow cytometer for cell analysis and particle sizing
Lab Chip
Use of nucleopore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
Integration of gene amplification and capillary gel electrophoresis on a polydimethylsiloxane-glass hybrid microchip
Electrophoresis
Application of a microfluidic device for counting of bacteria
Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
Cited by (36)
Microfluidics and materials for smart water monitoring: A review
2021, Analytica Chimica ActaCitation Excerpt :Since bacteria, parasites and pathogens are presented in very low numbers in potable water, large volumes of water need to be condensed and to reach the threshold of detection for current detection methods. This is a limitation of the existing technology, therefore multiple methods, including force spectroscopy [85], cytometry [86], laser scattering [73], electrochemical [87] and electrophoresis [17] were adopted by microfluidic technology to overcome the extremely low number of bacteria or pollutants to be analyzed in the sample. Another approach to improve detection is to exploit the intrinsic electrical properties of bacteria by the combination of two electrical techniques such as dielectrophoresis (DEP) and impedance measurements [88].
Era of nano-lab-on-a-chip (LOC) technology
2020, Handbook on Miniaturization in Analytical Chemistry: Application of NanotechnologyMicrofluidics technique for food quality evaluation
2019, Evaluation Technologies for Food QualityElectrochemically engineered nanoporous photonic crystal structures for optical sensing and biosensing
2019, Handbook of Nanomaterials in Analytical Chemistry: Modern Trends in AnalysisMicro total analysis systems with nanomaterials
2019, Handbook of Nanomaterials in Analytical Chemistry: Modern Trends in AnalysisBeverage spoilage yeast detection methods and control technologies: A review of Brettanomyces
2018, International Journal of Food MicrobiologyCitation Excerpt :Another option proposed is the use of microscopy in microfluidic devices. For example, Sakamoto et al. (2007) proposed a microfluidic system by using epifluorescence microscopy, for Escherichia coli bacteria quantification in water with a high correlation (r2 = 0.99). Finally, based on flow cytometry method, Jha et al. (2011) suggested a microfluidic device for accurately monitoring bacteria levels in aqueous samples, which has the potential to be a low-cost rapid detection method using nanolitre samples and provides a rapid, quantitative assay.