Elsevier

Molecular Immunology

Volume 45, Issue 3, February 2008, Pages 619-631
Molecular Immunology

Review
Quantitative challenges in understanding ligand discrimination by αβ T cells

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2007.03.028Get rights and content

Introduction

To fight viral or bacterial infections effectively without endangering their own viability, vertebrate organisms rely on the ability of their adaptive immune system to distinguish self from non-self agents. Among the many components of the adaptive immune system, the major CD4+ and CD8+ subsets of αβ T cells recognize antigens from these infectious organisms primarily in the form of peptides bound major histocompatibility complex-encoded molecules (pMHCs). The cellular processes that generate and load peptides onto MHC molecules, then export the resulting pMHC ligands to the cell surface for recognition by the receptors of T cells, do not generally discriminate between pathogen-derived and self-derived proteins or translation products. This leaves the critical task of ligand discrimination to the T lymphocyte itself—T cells must be able to be efficiently activated by infected or professional antigen presenting cells (APCs) bearing foreign ligands, while remaining for the most part in a naïve state upon interaction with normal (uninfected) cells.

This sharp discrimination has been documented experimentally both with functional assays (involving responses spanning hours to days, e.g. cytokine secretion, cytotoxicity, proliferation) or signaling assays (dealing with responses in the minute to hour range, e.g. calcium influx, kinase activity). These assays revealed that a T cell expressing a particular αβ receptor shows distinct responses to structurally related pMHC ligands, with a rather clear separation between agonists (which trigger T cell activation and are typically associated with receptor ligands derived from proteins of infectious agents) and non-agonists (which fail to trigger T cell activation and comprise the bulk of ligands with peptides derived from broadly expressed self proteins) (Davis et al., 1998, Germain and Stefanova, 1999). This distinction can be refined with subcategories of (1) strong agonists, which trigger all functions of T cells, even at low presentation levels, (2) weak/partial agonists which trigger T cells only when presented at very high dose and may stimulate only some of a cell's potential outputs, (3) antagonists, which not only fail to trigger functional responses from T cells but also may diminish activation-induced by agonist ligands when the two ligands are presented on the same APC, (4) synergistic endogenous peptides, which enhance the response of T cells to small quantities of agonist peptides, but fail to trigger these cells on their own (Krogsgaard et al., 2005), and (5) null ligands.

A major challenge in the field of ligand discrimination by T cells is the construction of a detailed, quantitative, mechanistic model that accounts for the ability of small differences in TCR-ligand binding to give rise to the extremely wide divergence in the dose–responses characteristic of closely related pMHCs interacting with the same TCR. Such model building is made difficult by the need to ensure that mechanisms implemented to account for threshold setting in response to variant pMHCs are also compatible with other known properties of T cell activation (namely its sensitivity and speed (Altan-Bonnet and Germain, 2005)).

In this review, we will discuss how ligand discrimination by T cells came to be viewed as the result of kinetic thresholding rather than allosteric regulation and present recent models showing how incorporating differential signaling feedback pathways into a kinetic proofreading scheme can explain the bulk of available results and predict new behaviors that have been verified by experiment. We will also discuss how these schemes potentially provide a quantitative explanation for adaptation of the ligand discrimination properties of T cells during their differentiation and maturation.

Section snippets

Ligand discrimination involving allostery: an Arlésienne with conceptual challenges

Activation of T lymphocytes is triggered by the engagement of their receptors (TCR) with pMHC ligands on the surface of antigen-presenting T cells. In contrast to co-evolved receptor–ligand pairs for which signaling secondary to ligand-induced conformational change can be easily understood to have been selected over long (evolutionarily relevant) time periods, there is no such genetic relationship between TCR fine specificity and ligand structure. This raises the question of whether it is

Theoretical understanding of ligand discrimination

For the sake of quantitatively understanding T cell ligand discrimination, theoreticians are thus left with the “lifetime dogma”, with the TCR–pMHC lifetime as the single biophysical parameter determining the functional activation of T cells. In fact, as the lifetime dogma emerged, specific quantitative models were proposed showing how exquisite ligand discrimination could be achieved when there were only “minute” biophysical differences in pMHC–TCR lifetimes between agonists and non-agonists.

Tunability of ligand discrimination in T cell activation

As argued above, it is difficult to reconcile with allosteric models of discrimination the ability of a pMHC ligand to be a non-agonist for a mature T cell but an agonist mediating positive selection for a developing thymocyte with the same TCR. Rather, these data imply that the relationship between the biophysical parameters of pMHC–TCR interaction and agonist activity is determined by the differentiation state of the T cell and that the discrimination threshold is actively altered during

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have reviewed several quantitative challenges to our understanding of ligand discrimination in T cells. Although conformational changes associated with the engagement of TCR with agonist pMHC have been suggested by many groups, they remain a working hypothesis needing experimental confirmation and must be accompanied by an explanation for how thymocytes and mature T cells with identical TCRs respond differently to the same pMHC ligand. Kinetic thresholding is the more dominant

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (65)

  • D. Housset et al.

    What do TCR–pMHC crystal structures teach us about MHC restriction and alloreactivity?

    Trends Immunol.

    (2003)
  • G.J. Kersh

    High- and low-potency ligands with similar affinities for the TCR: the importance of kinetics in TCR signaling

    Immunity

    (1998)
  • M. Krogsgaard

    Evidence that structural rearrangements and/or flexibility during TCR binding can contribute to T cell activation

    Mol. Cell

    (2003)
  • Q.J. Li

    CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse

    Nat. Immunol.

    (2004)
  • G.M. Lord et al.

    A kinetic differentiation model for the action of altered TCR ligands

    Immunol. Today

    (1999)
  • B. Lucas

    Divergent changes in the sensitivity of maturing T cells to structurally related ligands underlies formation of a useful T cell repertoire

    Immunity

    (1999)
  • J.D. Rabinowitz

    Altered T cell receptor ligands trigger a subset of early T cell signals

    Immunity

    (1996)
  • C. Rosette

    The impact of duration versus extent of TCR occupancy on T cell activation: a revision of the kinetic proofreading model

    Immunity

    (2001)
  • Y. Sykulev

    Evidence that a single peptide-MHC complex on a target cell can elicit a cytolytic T cell response

    Immunity

    (1996)
  • X.L. Wang et al.

    Caveats in the design of MHC class I tetramer/antigen-specific T lymphocytes dissociation assays

    J. Immunol. Methods

    (2003)
  • D. Aivazian et al.

    Phosphorylation of T cell receptor zeta is regulated by a lipid dependent folding transition

    Nat. Struct. Biol.

    (2000)
  • G. Altan-Bonnet et al.

    Modeling T cell antigen discrimination based on feedback controls of digital ERK response

    PLoS Biol.

    (2005)
  • T.O. Cameron

    Cutting edge: detection of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells by HLA-DR1 oligomers is dependent on the T cell activation state

    J. Immunol.

    (2001)
  • F. Castellino et al.

    Cooperation between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells: when, where, and how

    Annu. Rev. Immunol.

    (2006)
  • F. Castellino

    Chemokines enhance immunity by guiding naive CD8+ T cells to sites of CD4+ T cell–dendritic cell interaction

    Nature

    (2006)
  • C. Chan et al.

    Cooperative enhancement of specificity in a lattice of T cell receptors

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2001)
  • M.A. Daniels

    Thymic selection threshold defined by compartmentalization of Ras/MAPK signalling

    Nature

    (2006)
  • G.M. Davey

    Preselection thymocytes are more sensitive to T cell receptor stimulation than mature T cells

    J. Exp. Med.

    (1998)
  • S.J. Davis et al.

    The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond

    Nat. Immunol.

    (2006)
  • M.M. Davis

    Ligand recognition by alpha beta T cell receptors

    Annu. Rev. Immunol.

    (1998)
  • S.J. Fleire

    B cell ligand discrimination through a spreading and contraction response

    Science

    (2006)
  • K.C. Garcia et al.

    Structural basis of T cell recognition

    Annu. Rev. Immunol.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (82)

    • T cell microvilli simulations show operation near packing limit and impact on antigen recognition

      2022, Biophysical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Lastly, T cells are able to amplify small differences in antigen affinity into large differences in their responses (19). Furthermore, T cells can ignore APCs that express a high abundance of self-derived antigen while retaining sensitivity to only a few foreign antigen, even in cases where they may be chemically similar (20). We have previously speculated that small contacts, such as the ones formed by MVs, could improve the antigen discrimination (21).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text