Elsevier

Neuroscience Letters

Volume 464, Issue 2, 23 October 2009, Pages 84-87
Neuroscience Letters

Establishing the definition and inter-rater reliability of cortical silent period calculation in subjects with focal hand dystonia and healthy controls

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.029Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe a clearly defined manual method for calculating cortical silent period (CSP) length that can be employed successfully and reliably by raters after minimal training in subjects with focal hand dystonia (FHD) and healthy subjects. A secondary purpose was to explore intra-subject variability of the CSP in subjects with FHD vs. healthy subjects. Two raters previously naïve to CSP identification and one experienced rater independently analyzed 170 CSP measurements collected in 6 subjects with focal hand dystonia (FHD) and 9 healthy subjects. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to quantify inter-rater reliability within the two groups of subjects. The relative variability of CSP in each group was calculated by the coefficient of variation (CV). Relative variation between raters within repeated measures of individual subjects was also quantified by CV. Reliability measures were as follows—mean of three raters: all subjects: ICC = 0.976; within healthy subjects: ICC = 0.965; in subjects with FHD: ICC = 0.956. The median within-subject variability for the healthy group was CV = 7.33% and in subjects with FHD:CV = 11.78%. The median variability of calculating individual subject CSP duration between raters was CV = 10.23% in subjects with dystonia and CV = 10.46% in healthy subjects. Manual calculation of CSP results in excellent reliability between raters of varied levels of experience. Healthy subjects display less variability in CSP. Despite greater variability, the CSP in impaired subjects can be reliably calculated across raters.

Section snippets

Acknowledgements

This work is supported, in part, by M01-RR00400 National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health and by the Dystonia Medical Research Foundation. We would like to thank Dr. Richard DiFabio for his statistical advice.

References (31)

  • M. Borich et al.

    Lasting effects of repeated rTMS application in focal hand dystonia

    Restorative Neurology & Neuroscience

    (2009)
  • H.J. Braune et al.

    Asymmetry of silent period evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients

    Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

    (1996)
  • B. Calancie et al.

    Motor-unit responses in human wrist flexor and extensor muscles to transcranial cortical stimuli

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1987)
  • R. Cantello et al.

    Parkinson's disease rigidity: magnetic motor evoked potentials in a small hand muscle

    Neurology

    (1991)
  • J. Classen et al.

    The motor syndrome associated with exaggerated inhibition within the primary motor cortex of patients with hemiparetic

    Brain

    (1997)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Nervous system excitability and joint stiffness following short-term dynamic ankle immobilization

      2018, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Determination of the CSP followed criteria described by Nilsson et al. in which a series of student’s t-tests were used to compare logarithmically-transformed EMG activity normalized to pre-stimulus activity to a 4-ms window in order to determine when t-tests were no longer significant, indicating EMG activity returned to pre-stimulus levels [25]. Cursors were placed on a plot and a trained investigator confirmed locations were accurate, extracting the time between the start of the MEP and resumption of normal activity as the CSP [26]. The ratio of Hmax to Mmax (Hmax:Mmax) was assessed using two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) for each muscle with two within-subjects factors (Device, 3 levels; Time, 2 levels).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text