Elsevier

Neuroscience Research

Volume 59, Issue 3, November 2007, Pages 243-250
Neuroscience Research

Activation of parieto-frontal stream during reaching and grasping studied by positron emission tomography in monkeys

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2007.07.003Get rights and content

Abstract

The whole brain activation during visually guided reaching and grasping behaviors was investigated in three macaque monkeys using positron emission tomography (PET) scanning with [15O]H2O. Activation was consistently observed in the parietal regions such as PO, MIP, VIP, LIP and AIP, frontal regions such as PMd, M1 and S1 on the contralateral hemisphere and in the ipsilateral intermediate and lateral deep cerebellar nuclei. Activation was also observed in the areas representing the central and peripheral visual field in the early visual cortices. Thus, the visuo-motor processing, including parieto-frontal stream, involved in the control of visually guided reaching and grasping behaviors could be visualized for the first time in macaque monkeys.

Introduction

Visually guided reaching and grasping are typical goal directed movements in which visual information about the spatial location and shape of the target object is processed for generation of sequentially coordinated multi-joint movements of the hand and arm (Arbib et al., 1985, Jeannerod, 1988). Many studies have been conducted to search for the neuroanatomical substrate of the visuo-motor processing underlying the control of reaching and grasping. In general, visual information leaves the primary visual cortex via two major pathways; a dorsal pathway directed to the posterior parietal cortex and the ventral one to the inferior temporal lobe (Ungerleider and Mishkin, 1982). Among these, the dorsal visual stream was supposed to be involved in the control of visually guided reaching and grasping because of existence of direct connection from the posterior parietal cortex to premotor frontal cortices (Milner and Goodale, 1995).

To understand the neural mechanism for the control of the reaching and grasping movements, it is essential to know the information carried by neurons in individual areas involved in the control and their relative contribution. There are a large number of descriptions on the neural activities of several cerebral cortical regions such as motor and premotor cortex (Caminiti et al., 1991, Wise et al., 1986, Foggassi et al., 1999, Gentilucci et al., 1988, Rizzolatti et al., 1988) and parietal cortex (Calton et al., 2002, Fattori et al., 2001, Taira et al., 1990, Sakata et al., 1995), and cerebellum (Fu et al., 1997, Greger et al., 2004, Kitazawa et al., 1998, van Kan et al., 1994) during the reaching and/or grasping tasks by electrophysiological recordings of single unit activities in non-human primates. However, in these studies, relative contribution of individual areas is not clear. Based on functional and anatomical studies, it has been proposed that reaching and grasping movements are controlled by separate pathways; reaching by a medial parieto-frontal pathway that involves medial bank of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) and grasping by a lateral parieto-frontal stream involving the lateral bank of the IPS and ventral premotor cortex (PMv) (Jeannerod et al., 1995, Wise et al., 1997). However, several authors argue against the existence of these parallel visuo-motor channels (Desmurget et al., 1996, Mon-Williams and McIntosh, 2000). On the other hand, there is disagreement on the contribution of supplementary motor area (SMA) to simple visually guided reaching task (Picard and Strick, 2003). To obtain clearer perspective on these issues, we performed the brain activation studies in macaque monkeys while they are performing simple visually guided reaching and grasping task by measuring the cerebral blood flow (CBF) with PET scanning with [15O]H2O. The advantages of using PET for studying the whole brain activation during reaching and grasping are: (1) there is little technical constraints on behaviors of the animals that can be conducted in the scanner, compared to fMRI; they can perform large body movements such as reaching in the 3D space, grasping a particular object, and eat it, and (2) it is possible to conduct a large number of scanning sessions to obtain clear brain imaging data in individual animals, which is usually not possible in humans.

By using this technique, we could clarify the whole brain regions involved in the visuo-motor processing for the control of visually guided reaching and grasping task. The present results will surely supply solid base on understanding the neural control of reaching and grasping movements.

Section snippets

Subjects

Three macaque monkeys [two Macaca mulatta (monkey T: male 8.1 kg, monkey K: male 6.5 kg) and one Macaca fuscata (monkey H: female 6.7 kg)] were used in the present study. The experiments were subjected to prior reviews by the Ethical Committee of the National Institute for Natural Sciences and were performed in accordance with the NIH Guideline for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Guidelines of the Central Research Laboratory, Hamamatsu Photonics.

Tasks

Before the scanning session, the

Results

Fig. 2 shows the regions of the brain with significant increase in activity in individual monkeys during performing the reaching and grasping task compared with the control task. At a large glance, the increase in activity could be observed in both medial and lateral banks of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and both rostal and caudal banks of the central sulcus, corresponding to the hand/arm region of M1 and S1, and premotor cortex on the contralateral hemisphere in all the monkeys. In addition,

Methodological consideration

This is the first study of the whole brain activation while the monkey is performing visually guided reaching and grasping in 3D space by measuring the increase in rCBF by PET. A major purpose of this study was to clarify the brain activation during gross and natural arm and hand movements. We tried to dissect this component by subtracting the rCBF during the control task from that the reaching and grasping task. Because we did not control the eye movements during these tasks, it might be

Summary and future directions

The current results presented the fundamental database on the whole brain activation during the relatively simple reaching and grasping task. The flow of visual information from the primary visual cortex, through posterior parietal cortex and premotor cortex to the primary sensorimotor cortices was clearly visualized. The advantage of using the PET system is that the monkeys can perform natural gross forearm movements in the 3D space and the experiments can involve various experimental

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas “Integrative Brain Research” from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (Project No. 17021041) and the grant from the Core Research of Evolutionary Science and Technology (CREST) of Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) to T.I., as well as the Molecular Imaging Program on “Research Base for Exploring New Drugs” from MEXT. A monkey was supplied from Academic

References (28)

  • L. Foggassi et al.

    Visual responses in the dorsal premotor area F2 of the macaque monkey

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1999)
  • Q.G. Fu et al.

    Relationship of cerebellar Purkinje cell simple spike discharge to movement kinematics in the monkey

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1997)
  • M. Gentilucci et al.

    Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. I. Somatotopy and the control of proximal movements

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1988)
  • B. Greger et al.

    Spike firing in the lateral cerebellar cortex correlated with movement and motor parameters irrespective of the effector limb

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (20)

    • The Interactions Between Primary Somatosensory and Motor Cortex during Human Grasping Behaviors

      2022, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, neurophysiological studies showed that motor (Muir and Lemon, 1983; Bennett and Lemon, 1996) and somatosensory (Salimi et al., 1999; Ro et al., 2000) cortical neurons are significantly active during grasping movements. In agreement, neuroimaging studies showed grasp-related neuronal responses within M1 and S1 in primates (Nishimura et al., 2007; Nelissen and Vanduffel, 2011) and humans (Begliomini et al., 2007; Fabbri et al., 2016). Lesion studies have shown that damage to M1 (Lang and Schieber, 2003, 2004) or S1 (Hikosaka et al., 1985; Brochier et al., 1999) disrupts grasping movements.

    • Plasticity for recovery after partial spinal cord injury - Hierarchical organization

      2014, Neuroscience Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Brain imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) with H215O was performed in three animals during performance of the reach and precision grip task in three macaque monkeys. Before injury, higher activation was observed in the sensorimotor cortex and fronto-parietal stream on the contralateral side to the moving arm (Nishimura et al., 2007b). After the lesion, during the early stage of recovery (1 month after the lesion), when the performance of precision grip recovered above 80% of the success ratio, activation was increased compared to the intact state in the hand representation areas of the bilateral sensorimotor cortex.

    • Cortical and subcortical compensatory mechanisms after spinal cord injury in monkeys

      2012, Experimental Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fig. 4A–C shows the regions of the brain with significant increases in activity associated with the visually guided reach and grasp movements before the SCI. Task-related increases in activity were observed in the banks of the intraparietal sulcus and both rostral and caudal banks of the central sulcus, corresponding to the hand/arm regions of the S1, M1, and premotor cortex (PM) on the contralateral hemisphere during all recovery stages (Nishimura et al., 2007a). To identify the cortical regions that showed recovery-related increases in activity, we compared the regional cerebral blood flow (r-CBF) during the postoperative stages with that during the preoperative stage (Nishimura et al., 2007b).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text