Fast optical signal not detected in awake behaving monkeys
Introduction
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been used for more than a decade to study functional cerebral activation in humans non-invasively (Hoshi and Tamura, 1993, Villringer and Chance, 1997). Similar to fMRI, NIRS is sensitive to the vascular changes following neuronal activity. The vascular responses consist of increases in cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume, which cause an increase in oxy-hemoglobin concentration (HbO) and a decrease in deoxy-hemoglobin concentration (HbR). These latter concentration changes are detected by NIRS as changes in light absorbance. While the neuronal electrical signal starts tens of ms after stimulation, the hemodynamic response is delayed and has a latency of a few seconds after stimulation. The spatial and temporal characteristics of the slow optical signals are in agreement and have been validated with fMRI (Huppert et al., 2006a, Huppert et al., 2006b, Sassaroli et al., 2006, Toronov et al., 2007). A less robust but more appealing optical signal is the so-called ‘fast signal’ or ‘event-related optical signal’ (EROS) (Gratton et al., 1997b), which detects cortical changes of unclear origin in the ms time scale. The tremendous appeal of the fast signal is due to its short temporal latency, which implies a more direct relationship between neuronal activation and the fast signal compared to the relation that exists with the slow hemoglobin signal. The ability to measure optically both the neuronal and vascular responses non-invasively in humans with reasonable spatial localization puts NIRS in the spotlight as an optimal technique to investigate neurovascular coupling.
Fast light scattering changes possibly induced by cell conformational changes and swelling were originally measured in cell cultures and tissue preparations (Carter et al., 2004, Cohen et al., 1968, Salzberg and Obaid, 1988, Stepnoski et al., 1991, Tasaki and Byrne, 1992, Yao et al., 2005). Detecting back-scattered or cross-polarized light, Rector et al. were able to measure fast optical changes in an animal's exposed cortex (Rector et al., 2001, Schei et al., 2008). As stressed by Steinbrink et al. (2005) the existence of fast optical changes in neuronal tissue and the feasibility of using invasive optical methods, like cross-polarized and back-scattered light detection, to detect such changes are not in question. The controversy pertains to the reliability of such measurements obtained with non-invasive optical methods, like NIRS. The first measure of the ‘fast’ signal in humans through intact skin and skull was reported over a decade ago by Gratton et al., 1995, Gratton et al., 1997a) using a frequency-domain NIRS system (Imagent, ISS Inc.) and measuring the phase lag (or change in the time of flight) induced by evoked scattering changes (the EROS signal). In the past 10 years, Gratton et al. have published a number of very encouraging results with the EROS signal: for example (Bartholow et al., 2001, Gratton et al., 2006, Gratton et al., 1997b, Gratton and Fabiani, 2001, Maclin et al., 2004, Tse et al., 2007). Several groups, including ours, have tried to reproduce Gratton's measurements (Franceschini and Boas, 2004, Steinbrink et al., 2000, Wolf et al., 2002, Wolf et al., 2003) with moderate success. In contrast with Gratton's results, these groups have shown, both experimentally and theoretically (with Monte Carlo simulations), that an intensity measurement is better than a phase measurement for detecting the fast signal, because of the better SNR. In a critical work by Steinbrink et al. (2005), the feasibility of reliably measuring the non-invasive fast optical signal in humans is interrogated, both theoretically and experimentally: the argument being that, based on the estimate of scattering change measured invasively, these changes are too small with respect to instrumental SNR when the partial volume effect is taken into account. For fast signal detection, instrumental SNR is typically increased by averaging a very large number of stimuli and averaging responses across several subjects (Maclin et al., 2007). In addition, physiological noise such as arterial pulsation is reduced using adaptive filters (Gratton and Corballis, 1995, Maclin et al., 2003), and by presenting stimuli in an event-related fashion. Steinbrink et al. (2005), in addition, increased the SNR significantly by using an optimized NIRS system with considerably higher light power (70–150 MW) delivered to the head than with typical NIRS systems (up to 5–10 MW), thereby reducing the standard error in the average intensity to 3 × 10−6, which theoretically was of the order of magnitude of expected scattering induced changes at the head surface. Despite the extremely low noise, they were not able to detect fast optical signals.
To minimize the partial volume effect, and subsequently to further highlight the difficulty of detecting the NIRS fast signal, we performed several NIRS measurements on two macaque monkeys with a recording well with exposed dura over the right primary visual cortex (V1). The head of the animal was restrained by a headpost cemented to the skull, and the optical probe was inserted into the recording well in contact with the dura. This set up mitigates any signal contamination by motion artifacts and avoids signal attenuation from the scalp and skull. These experimental conditions allowed us to perform measurements at a shorter distance from the brain than in human experiments, thereby improving sensitivity to cerebral changes. In different measurement sessions we used a CW and an FD NIRS system and in several sessions we acquired EEG simultaneously with NIRS to detect visual evoked potentials (VEPs). While the NIRS hemodynamic response and the VEP were detected with optimal SNR by averaging few stimuli, we did not detect any reliable fast optical signal even after averaging thousands of stimuli during multiple measurement sessions across the two animals. We conclude that the fast optical signal measured with NIRS is too difficult to obtain to be of any practical utility.
Section snippets
Subjects, surgical and non-surgical preparation, and experimental setup
In this study we performed measurements on two male macaque monkeys (Macaca mulatta), M1 (4 years old, 5 ± 0.6 kg, 7 experimental sessions) and M2 (4 years old, 7 ± 0.56 kg, 5 experimental sessions). All surgeries and experimental procedures were approved by the Subcommittee on Research Animal Care (SRAC) at the Massachusetts General Hospital, in accordance with NIH guidelines.
Several months prior to the measurements, each monkey was implanted with an MR-compatible plastic headpost covered by
Monte Carlo simulation results
In the well configuration, at a 1.0-cm SD separation, we obtained ac changes of 0.5%, 2.1% and 4% for 1%, 5%, 10% V1 scattering changes (P values < 10− 4), respectively. We verified the linear dependence of the ac changes with respect to the scattering changes and estimated an ac change of 0.19% for a 0.4% scattering change and 0.12% for a 0.2% scattering change. We obtained similar results at 1.5-cm SD separation, with slightly higher P values. These changes in ac are well above our measurement
Discussion and conclusions
With these experiments we tested the feasibility of detecting the fast optical signal with NIRS in an optimal experimental setup. Measuring human subjects, Steinbrink et al. (2005) reduced the instrumental noise to below estimated fast signal levels by designing an ultra-low-noise CW instrument. In contrast, we used conventional instruments previously used to detect the fast signal and increased the SNR by collecting data closer to the cortex. In fact, the animal model we used, with exposed
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01-EB001954, R01-EB000790 and R01-EY017081, the Human Frontiers Science Program (HFSPO), GSKE, IUAP 5/04, and EF/05/014. The Martinos Center is supported by N.C.R.R. grant P41RR14075 and the MIND Institute.
References (38)
- et al.
Simultaneous birefringence and scattered light measurements reveal anatomical features in isolated crustacean nerve
J. Neurosci. Methods
(2004) - et al.
Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction
NeuroImage
(1999) - et al.
Non invasive measurement of neuronal activity with near-infrared optical imaging
NeuroImage
(2004) - et al.
The event-related optical signal: a new tool for studying brain function
Int. J. Psychophysiol.
(2001) - et al.
Fast and localized event-related optical signals (EROS) in the human occipital cortex: comparisons with the visual evoked potential and fMRI
NeuroImage
(1997) - et al.
Effects of measurement method, wavelength, and source-detector distance on the fast optical signal
NeuroImage
(2006) - et al.
Detection of dynamic changes in cerebral oxygenation coupled to neuronal function during mental work in man
Neurosci. Lett.
(1993) - et al.
A temporal comparison of BOLD, ASL, and NIRS hemodynamic responses to motor stimuli in adult humans
NeuroImage
(2006) - et al.
The event-related optical signal to electrical stimulation of the median nerve
NeuroImage
(2004) Visual evoked potentials to luminance and chromatic contrast in rhesus monkeys
Vis. Res.
(1986)
Scattered-light imaging in vivo tracks fast and slow processes of neurophysiological activation
NeuroImage
Spatially weighted BOLD signal for comparison of functional magnetic resonance imaging and near-infrared imaging of the brain
NeuroImage
Action potential propagation imaged with high temporal resolution near-infrared video microscopy and polarized light
NeuroImage
Simultaneous EEG and fMRI in the macaque monkey at 4.7 Tesla
Magn. Reson. Imaging
Somatosensory evoked fast optical intensity changes detected non-invasively in the adult human head
Neurosci. Lett.
The fast optical signal—robust or elusive when non-invasively measured in the human adult?
NeuroImage
Rapid structural changes in nerve fibers evoked by electric current pulses
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
A spatial and temporal comparison of hemodynamic signals measured using optical and functional magnetic resonance imaging during activation in the human primary visual cortex
NeuroImage
Visual motion processing investigated using contrast agent-enhanced fMRI in awake behaving monkeys
Neuron
Cited by (50)
Detection of optical neuronal signals in the visual cortex using continuous wave near-infrared spectroscopy
2014, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :To ensure that the optical neuronal signals obtained were neither an aliasing of functional hemodynamic changes (such as ‘rapid deoxygenation’) nor generated through the insufficient suppression of the influence of arterial pulsation or motion artifacts, Franceschini and Boas established a series of criteria to discriminate between the optical neuronal signal and the interference, and these authors obtained reliable optical neuronal signals in no more than 60% of the measurements performed within the sensorimotor cortex using a CW NIRS system (Franceschini and Boas, 2004). In contrast, in 2009, the same group did not detect any optical neuronal signal in the visual cortex of the brains from two macaque monkeys (Radhakrishnan et al., 2009). Thus, the optical neuronal signal is more difficult to detect in the visual cortex than in the sensorimotor or somatosensory cortex.