Elsevier

Neuropsychologia

Volume 49, Issue 9, July 2011, Pages 2609-2618
Neuropsychologia

Alzheimer's disease and memory-monitoring impairment: Alzheimer's patients show a monitoring deficit that is greater than their accuracy deficit

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.008Get rights and content

Abstract

We assessed the ability of two groups of patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and two groups of older adults to monitor the likely accuracy of recognition judgments and source identification judgments about who spoke something earlier. Alzheimer's patients showed worse performance on both memory judgments and were less able to monitor with confidence ratings the likely accuracy of both kinds of memory judgments, as compared to a group of older adults who experienced the identical study and test conditions. Critically, however, when memory performance was made comparable between the AD patients and the older adults (e.g., by giving AD patients extra exposures to the study materials), AD patients were still greatly impaired at monitoring the likely accuracy of their recognition and source judgments. This result indicates that the monitoring impairment in AD patients is actually worse than their memory impairment, as otherwise there would have been no differences between the two groups in monitoring performance when there were no differences in accuracy. We discuss the brain correlates of this memory-monitoring deficit and also propose a Remembrance–Evaluation model of memory-monitoring.

Highlights

► We show that AD patients are strikingly unaware of the accuracy of their memories. ► AD group unable to distinguish between correct and incorrect responses. ► Memory monitoring deficit occurs even when AD and controls are matched on accuracy.

Section snippets

Participants

The participants consisted of twenty-four clinically diagnosed, mild AD patients (age range from 56 to 86) who were assigned to either the AD group or the AD-m group (i.e., 12 in each group). Twenty-four healthy older adults (age range from 62 to 90) were assigned to either the Older group or the Older-m group (i.e., 12 in each group). Each group consisted of 6 females and 6 males, except in the AD-m group where there were 5 females and 7 males. The AD group and the older group experienced the

Recognition performance and recognition monitoring

We examined recognition performance with hit rates (i.e., proportion of studied items judged “old”), corrected recognition rates (i.e., hit rates minus false alarm rates to novel items) and d′ scores (e.g., Snodgrass & Corwin, 1988). With respect to monitoring performance, there are two fundamentally different ways of measuring how individuals use confidence ratings to monitor and judge the accuracy of their responses (e.g., Koriat and Goldsmith, 1996, Pannu and Kaszniak, 2005, Yaniv et al.,

General discussion

This study examined the ability of AD patients and healthy older adults to monitor and judge the likely accuracy of recognition judgments and source judgments about who spoke something earlier. Participants listened to statements at encoding that were presented by a woman and a man, and at a subsequent test phase, participants provided confidence ratings about the likely accuracy of their recognition judgments (i.e., was this statement encountered during the encoding phase or not?) and source

References (55)

  • D.L. Schacter et al.

    False recognition and the right frontal lobe: A case study

    Neuropsychologia

    (1996)
  • D.M. Schnyer et al.

    A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: Evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex

    Neuropsychologia

    (2004)
  • C. Souchay

    Metamemory in Alzheimer's disease

    Cortex

    (2007)
  • C. Souchay et al.

    Alzheimer's disease and feeling-of-knowing in episodic memory

    Neuropsychologia

    (2002)
  • I. Tendolkar et al.

    Neural correlates of recognition memory with and without recollection in patients with Alzheimer's disease and healthy controls

    Neuroscience Letters

    (1999)
  • J.D. Waring et al.

    Preserved metamemorial ability in patients with Alzheimer's disease: Shifting response bias

    Brain & Cognition

    (2008)
  • R. Allen-Burge et al.

    Age equivalence in feeling-of-knowing experiences

    Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences

    (2000)
  • N. Brewer et al.

    The confidence–accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity and target-absent base rates

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

    (2006)
  • A.E. Budson et al.

    When false recognition is unopposed by true recognition: Gist based memory distortion in Alzheimer's disease

    Neuropsychology

    (2000)
  • A.E. Budson et al.

    Metacognition and false recognition in Alzheimer's disease: Further exploration of the distinctiveness heuristic

    Neuropsychology

    (2005)
  • A.E. Budson et al.

    Memory and emotions for the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in patients with Alzheimer's disease, patients with mild cognitive impairment, and healthy older adults

    Neuropsychology

    (2004)
  • E.C. Butterfield et al.

    Developmental aspects of the feeling of knowing

    Developmental Psychology

    (1988)
  • G. Dalla Barba

    Recognition memory and recollective experience in Alzheimer's disease

    Memory

    (1997)
  • G. Dalla Barba et al.

    Confabulation, executive functions and source memory in Alzheimer's disease

    Cognitive Neuropsychology

    (1999)
  • C.S. Dodson et al.

    Aging, metamemory and high confidence errors: A misrecollection account

    Psychology and Aging

    (2007)
  • C.S. Dodson et al.

    Aging and a signal detection model of illusory recollection

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (2007)
  • C.S. Dodson et al.

    I misremember it well: Why older adults are unreliable eyewitnesses

    Psychological Bulletin & Review

    (2006)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Aging and Memory

      2017, Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference
    • Relating pessimistic memory predictions to Alzheimer's disease brain structure

      2016, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      Traditionally, metamemory theoretical framework (Nelson & Narens, 1990) distinguishes metacognitive judgments that are performed during retrieval attempt, with feeling-of-knowing (FOK), from metacognitive judgments that are performed directly after target retrieval, expressed as judgments of confidence (JOC). The few studies that have examined post-retrieval metacognitive judgments (JOC) in AD patients suggested that such metacognitive processes can be relatively preserved (Gallo, Cramer, Wong, & Bennett, 2012; Moulin, James, Perfect, & Jones, 2003), although it might depend on task-demands and the stage of dementia (Dodson et al., 2011). In contrast, predictive metacognitive judgments (FOK) have been found to be altered in AD-like pathology with AD patients and patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) tending to overestimate their abilities (Perrotin, Belleville, & Isingrini, 2007; Souchay, Isingrini, & Gil, 2002).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant 0925145 (CSD) and National Institute on Aging grants R01 AG025815 (AEB) and P30 AG13846 (AEB). This material is also the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Bedford VA Hospital in Bedford, MA.

    View full text