Reinterpreting pericentromeric heterochromatin
Introduction
The chromatin domains that flank centromeres are known as pericentromeric heterochromatin, pericentric heterochromatin, or simply as pericentromeres. Pericentromeres are the primary sites of sister chromatid cohesion, which is necessary for proper orientation of paired kinetochores during cell division. There is a long history of proposing functional relationships between heterochromatin and cohesion (e.g. [1, 2]) but the strongest data come from recent years, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In this fission yeast, an interplay of weak repeat transcription, double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) formation and processing, and short interfering RNA (siRNA)-directed histone modification creates a biochemically defined pericentric heterochromatin domain [3, 4]. Virtually any disturbance of the heterochromatic state in S. pombe results in severe cell division defects due to loss of cohesion [3, 4]. In plants, however, recent data suggest there is very little functional relationship between heterochromatin and cohesion. Here, we review these data and present our perspectives on the origin of heterochromatin and the cell biology of chromosome segregation.
Section snippets
The role of the functional pericentromere in cell division
Accurate chromosome segregation requires a series of timely molecular events. Chief among these are the deposition and removal of cohesin complexes that mediate the association of sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Cohesins consist of four subunits that are thought to form ring structures that link DNA and align replicated chromosomes along their lengths [5, 6]. Cohesin facilitates chromosome inheritance in two important ways: first, it ensures that sister kinetochores attach to the
The evolutionary biology of pericentromeres
Unlike their compact and genetically stable yeast counterparts, plant pericentromeres are ill-defined and genetically labile [15]. These traits have given pericentromeres a reputation as genomic ‘junkyards’: silent repositories of repetitive DNA and other useless DNA elements. To some extent this view is probably correct, but the large reservoirs of DNA within pericentromeres might also contribute to the evolution of new genes and new forms of gene regulation.
The portion of pericentromeres that
The origin of heterochromatin
What factors contribute to the expansion of pericentromeres and their associated rapid evolutionary change? This question can be recast in terms of recombination suppression because recombination is thought to be a primary force in the removal of unnecessary sequences: when recombination is reduced by any mechanism, repeats are expected to accumulate ([24]; Figure 1). It is possible that cohesin suppresses recombination, but we know of no data from multicellular eukaryotes that would support
The heterochromatin-cohesion connection
It is increasingly apparent that the boundaries of eukaryotic centromeres and pericentromeres are defined by epigenetic mechanisms. Ironically, the key to pericentric silencing is a low level of transcription. Pericentric transcripts are processed into siRNAs by RNA interference (RNAi) machinery and fed into a loop that maintains a heterochromatic state, which in S. pombe and animals is defined by methylation at histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) and the presence of HP-1/Swi6 (Heterochromatin
Histone phosphorylation as an epigenetic mark for cohesin deposition
During cell division in many organisms, pericentromeric chromatin is phosphorylated at conserved histone H3 residues serine10 and 28 (H3S10ph and H3S28ph) by Aurora kinases, which are key regulators of the transition from metaphase to anaphase and the release of chromatids [44, 45, 46]. These phosphorylation events are thought to be important for chromosome condensation [47], and in plants are strongly correlated with cohesion [43, 48, 49••]. Maize plants that carry mutations in the meiotic
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
Acknowledgements
Work in the corresponding author's laboratory is supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (0421671).
References (56)
- et al.
A REC8-dependent plant Shugoshin is required for maintenance of centromeric cohesion during meiosis and has no mitotic functions
Curr Biol
(2005) - et al.
Genetics of meiotic prophase I in plants
Annu Rev Plant Biol
(2006) - et al.
Dynamic evolution at pericentromeres
Genome Res
(2006) - et al.
Mouse centric and pericentric satellite repeats form distinct functional heterochromatin
J Cell Biol
(2004) - et al.
The Arabidopsis heterochromatin protein1 homolog (TERMINAL FLOWER2) silences genes within the euchromatic region but not genes positioned in heterochromatin
Plant Cell Physiol
(2005) - et al.
Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids
Science
(2000) Sequence of centromere separation: role of centromeric heterochromatin
Genetics
(1982)- et al.
Requirement of heterochromatin for cohesion at centromeres
Science
(2001) - et al.
Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi
Science
(2002) - et al.
Targeting of cohesin by transcriptionally silent chromatin
Genes Dev
(2005)
Dynamic molecular linkers of the genome: the first decade of SMC proteins
Genes Dev
AtREC8 and AtSCC3 are essential to the monopolar orientation of the kinetochores during meiosis
J Cell Sci
Beyond the ABCs of CKC and SCC. Do centromeres orchestrate sister chromatid cohesion or vice versa?
Eur J Biochem
Shugoshin: guardian spirit at the centromere
Curr Opin Cell Biol
Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana SMC1 and SMC3: evidence that AtSMC3 may function beyond chromosome cohesion
J Cell Sci
Arabidopsis separase AESP is essential for embryo development and the release of cohesin during meiosis
Plant Cell
The rice OsRad21-4, an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein, is required for efficient meiosis
Plant Mol Biol
Pericentromeric regions of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) chromosomes consist of retroelements and tandemly repeated DNA and are structurally and evolutionarily labile
Genetics
Near the edge of a chromosome's ‘black hole’
Trends Genet
Genomic and genetic definition of a functional human centromere
Science
Lessons from the human genome: transitions between euchromatin and heterochromatin
Hum Mol Genet
The rice nuclear genome continuously integrates, shuffles, and eliminates the chloroplast genome to cause chloroplast-nuclear DNA flux
Plant Cell
Euchromatin and pericentromeric heterochromatin: comparative composition in the tomato genome
Genetics
In-depth sequence analysis of the tomato chromosome 12 centromeric region: identification of a large CAA block and characterization of pericentromere retrotranposons
Chromosoma
The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes
Nature
Genetic effects of heterochromatin in maize
Cited by (35)
Meiotic recombination within plant centromeres
2019, Current Opinion in Plant BiologyCitation Excerpt :There are also notable departures from monocentric architecture in holocentric and polycentric plants, where CENH3 occupancy and kinetochores are distributed along the entire length of the chromosomes or at multiple locations, respectively [59,60]. A further common feature of most plant centromeres is enrichment of transposable elements (TEs) and other repeats, flanking the centromeric satellite arrays, termed pericentromeric heterochromatin (Figure 1b) [61]. Plant heterochromatin is epigenetically modified with an array of chromatin modifications including CG, CHG and CHH DNA methylation, histone H3K9me2, H3K27me1, and histone variant H2A.W [62,63,64•,65].
Effect of SPL (Spent Pot Liner) and its main components on root growth, mitotic activity and phosphorylation of Histone H3 in Lactuca sativa L.
2016, Ecotoxicology and Environmental SafetyCitation Excerpt :The regular distribution pattern of phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 observed in cells of L. sativa that did not show CA, subjected to treatments with SPL, aluminum, fluoride and cyanide, is in agreement with that reported for plant species with monocentric chromosomes (Kászas and Cande, 2000; Manzanero et al., 2000, 2002; Paula et al., 2013). Studies have shown that H3S10ph events are more related to the maintenance of cohesion between sister chromatids and this post-translational modification occurs consistently while the sister chromatids remain cohesive, beginning in prophase until early anaphase (Manzanero et al., 2000; Germand et al., 2003; Topp and Dawe, 2006). Some of the cells with CA also had regular pattern of H3S10ph, but other cells showed no or reduced number of H3S10ph, especially in the treatments with cyanide and SPL.