Dilemmas in patient centeredness and shared decision making: A case for vulnerability☆
Introduction
Better than larger values – That show however true – This timid life of evidence keeps pleading – ‘I do not know’; Emily Dickinson (Fascicle 35–11).
This paper deals with patient centeredness and shared decision making as well as the dilemmas involved for physicians when communicating along the lines suggested in these models. Both patient centeredness and shared decision making have been advocated as the starting point of good communication in recent medical education programs. Also, these models would lead to improved patient reported outcomes, such as satisfaction, treatment adherence and health. Given the empirical evidence accumulated to date, one may have to conclude that such advantages are more difficult to reach and that a more nuanced standpoint has to be taken. This will be addressed, firstly, by looking at the history of the use of the concepts. Secondly, data are addressed that seem to indicate that a differentiated picture may be needed. Thirdly, theoretical approaches to explain non-supportive findings will be forwarded. Finally, conclusions will be drawn and some suggestions for a future approach will be given.
Section snippets
Ideology and conceptual issues
Over the last decades, a plea for patient centeredness was universally heard in medicine. This attention evolved from and was contrasted with illness-centered or doctor centered medicine. In their review on patient centeredness, Mead and Bower [1] asserted that ‘patient centeredness is a concept that has evolved from dissatisfaction with the conventional biomedical model of medicine to embody a complex set of professional, sociological and political ideas about the doctor–patient relationship’.
Non-supportive findings
Given the common elements formulated above, the patient profiting from a patient-centered approach is assumed to: (1) appreciate the physicians’ attention to psychosocial needs; (2) like to disclose concerns; (3) prefer to have a sense of partnership; (4) want to be actively involved in decision making. The latter implies the wish to be informed: one cannot be involved in decision making without being well informed.
As it turns out, some patients may be different though. Rudi van Dantzig, a well
Explanations
Patient-centered behavior may not always be comforting. Some patients may thus be less likely to benefit from patient-centered behavior and/or information giving and shared decision making. As outlined above, results of studies seem to indicate that patients with lower education, a worse prognosis as well as a higher level of anxiety, may be more likely to have a lower preference for these communicative approaches. Unfortunately however, the field of communication not only suffers from a
Conclusion
Taking things together, confusing conclusions may have to be drawn. To be patient centered meant to be respectful to patients, and being respectful was thought to imply paying attention to psychosocial issues, to stimulate autonomy and empowerment, among others by giving information and sharing decisions. These elements of patient centeredness were laid down in mission statements and several definitions of the concept.
Empirical evidence, however, turned out to provide a more differentiated
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful for the thoughtful comments to this paper of Jozien Bensing, Ellen Smets and Linda Zandbelt as well as for the latter's help in searching the literature.
References (43)
- et al.
Patient centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature
Soc Sci Med
(2000) - et al.
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centered approach in clinical consultations
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2001) - et al.
The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes
J Fam Practice
(2000) - et al.
Doctor–patient communication: a review of the literature
Soc Sci Med
(1995) - Association of American Medical Colleges. Physicians for the 21st Century: Report of the Project Panel on the General...
Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement
Acad Med
(2001)Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine
Patient Educ Couns
(2000)- et al.
Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues
Soc Sci Med
(2005) - et al.
Shared decision making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?
Soc Sci Med
(1997) - President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making...
Principles of biomedical ethics
Patient-centered medicine transforming the clinical method
Patient-Centered Medicine. transforming the clinical method
The impact of general practitioners’ patient-centredness on patients’ post-consultation satisfaction and enablement
Soc Sci Med
Is euthanasie tegenwoordig legaal? (Is euthanasia legal nowadays?)
NVVE Relevant
Patient-centered communication: do patients really prefer it?
J Gen Intern Med
Randomised controlled trial of patient centered care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk
Brit Med J
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
Patient centredness in chronic illness: what it is and does it matter?
Patient Educ Couns
The usefulness of distinguishing different types of general practice consultation, or are needed skills always the same?
Fam Pract
Trait anxiety and reactions to patient-centered and doctor centered styles of communication: an experimental study
Psychosom Med
Cited by (161)
Persuasive communication in medical decision-making during consultations with patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care
2022, Patient Education and CounselingPatients' compliance and resistance to medical authority in Nigerian clinical encounters
2021, Journal of PragmaticsCitation Excerpt :In these contexts, the person with deontic authority (in the current case, the doctor) does not claim unconditional authority in relation to the patients (Peräkylä, 1998: 301). Rather, a low level of medical authority seems to be imposed due to the doctors' sensitivity to patients' weaknesses and vulnerability (De Haes, 2006). As shown in extract 4, the doctor and patient are conversing about the latter's lack of conducting timely CD4 count tests.
Postpartum Contraception Options
2020, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :The components of shared decision making are included in Box 1. This process allows an even exchange of information that emphasizes a woman’s values and preferences and as a result can ensure a positive patient-provider interaction and lead to increased patient engagement, satisfaction, and contraceptive adherence.10–12 Many factors contribute to patient decisions about contraception and to the ultimate initiation of a particular method (Box 2), emphasizing why shared decision making is important.
Patient Satisfaction With Decision Making Does Not Correlate With Patient Centeredness of Surgeons
2020, Journal of Surgical ResearchPromoting shared decision making in advanced cancer: Development and piloting of a patient communication aid
2019, Patient Education and CounselingLet's Get Real about Person- and Family-Centred Geriatric Home Care: A Realist Synthesis
2019, Canadian Journal on Aging
- ☆
This paper was presented at the International Conference on Communication in Healthcare, Chicago, USA, 5–8 October 2005.