Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: Does physicians’ patient-centred communication matter?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Physicians’ patient-centred communication is assumed to stimulate patients’ active participation, thus leading to more effective and humane exchange in the medical consultation. We investigated the relationship between physicians’ patient-centred communication and patient participation in a medical specialist setting.

Methods

Participants were 30 residents and specialists in internal medicine, and 323 of their patients. Participants completed a questionnaire prior to a (videotaped) follow-up consultation. Physicians’ patient-centred communication was assessed by coding behaviours that facilitate or rather inhibit patients to express their perspective. Patient participation was determined by assessing (a) their relative contribution to the conversation, and (b) their active participation behaviour. Analyses accounted for relevant background characteristics.

Results

Physicians’ facilitating behaviour was found to be positively associated with patients’ relative contribution to the conversation as well as patients’ active participation behaviour. Physicians’ inhibiting behaviour was not related to patients’ relative contribution, and was, unexpectedly, positively associated with patients’ active participation behaviour. Physicians’ behaviour was particularly associated with patients’ expression of concerns and cues.

Conclusions

Physicians in internal specialist medicine appear to be able to facilitate patients’ active participation in the visit. The findings indicate that inhibiting behaviour may not have the expected blocking effect on patient participation: patients voiced their perspectives just the same and expressed even more concerns. Showing inhibiting behaviour may, alternatively, be a physician's response to the patient's increased participation in the encounter.

Practice implications

The results may give directions for future medical education and specialist training.

Introduction

A patient-centred approach is universally advocated in modern medical education. Despite different definitions [1], authors agree that patient-centred care acknowledges the patient as a person with a unique personal history and individual needs. Patient-centred interactions can be seen as “those in which the patients’ point of view is actively sought by the physician” [2].

Although several elements of patient-centred care have been described [1], [3], [4], the physician's exploratory communication or active listening skills are generally considered central. Patient-centred communication may accordingly be operationalised as the presence of facilitating behaviour, enabling patients to express their perspective on illness, treatment and health-related behaviour [5], [6], and the absence of inhibiting behaviour, discouraging patients to express their view [7]. Through such patient-centred communication the patient could feel encouraged and legitimized to tell more about symptoms, concerns, ideas and expectations, and to actively participate in the consultation [6], [8]. Indeed, health care providers’ facilitating communicative style was found to be related to patients’ active participation (e.g. [8], [9], [10], [11]) and certain physician behaviours appeared to promote or inhibit the disclosure of patients’ concerns and cues [12], [13].

Active patient participation during the medical encounter is expected to benefit the patient. It may reinforce patients’ confidence in their ability to manage their disease, leading to closer adherence to treatment regimens and in turn to improved health status [14]. Patients who actively participated in consultations were indeed able to change the focus of the consultation and control the amount of information provided [15], and had higher compliance levels [16]. In patients with chronic diseases active participation in the visit predicted better health status [10], [14], [17].

To date, research mainly focused on the effects of physicians’ facilitating behaviour, while the relationship between physicians’ inhibiting behaviour and patient participation was explored occasionally only. Furthermore, most research relating physicians’ facilitating behaviour to patient participation was conducted in primary care, other than some studies in paediatric care, pre-operative anaesthetics and oncology. Whether their results can be translated to other healthcare settings, e.g. medical specialist care, remains uncertain. As compared to general practitioners, medical specialists possess a more in-depth, expert understanding of a limited number of diseases within their respective domains [18]. In internal medicine specialties the average patient population tends to be older, more severely impaired and is more likely to have chronic diseases.

The aim of the present paper is to establish whether the degree of physicians’ patient-centred behaviour in internal specialist medicine is related to patients’ participation in the medical encounter (Fig. 1a). Evidently, besides physicians’ communicative behaviour, patient participation is related to patients’ socio-demographic, illness-related [10], [19], [20], [21], [22] and psychological characteristics [20], [23], visit-related characteristics [21], [24], [25] and physician characteristics [26] (Fig. 1b). Therefore we accounted for these. We hypothesize that when physicians display more facilitating behaviour and less inhibiting behaviour, patients will (a) have a greater relative contribution to the conversation and (b) display more active participation behaviour during the encounter.

Section snippets

Procedures and sample

All physicians working at the outpatient departments of general internal medicine, rheumatology and gastro-enterology of the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam were invited to participate between August 2001 and 2002. Their consecutive patients having a follow-up appointment were asked informed consent by letter, 1 week prior to their scheduled appointment. Patients were eligible if they were able to speak, read and write Dutch. Patients and physicians were told that the study regarded

Participants

Thirty physicians (response: 81%) participated (see Table 1), comprising 15 residents and 15 staff members. Non-participating physicians were more often staff members (p = 0.03) but did not differ in gender or (sub)specialty.

Of 455 eligible patients, 330 (73%) gave consent (averaging 11 patients per physician, range 3–18). Participating patients did not differ in age or gender, but were more likely to visit the gastro-enterology department (p = 0.03). Patients’ average age was 53 years, 42% was

Discussion

This study in internal specialist medicine confirms previous findings in other settings that physicians’ facilitating behaviour is positively associated with patients’ disclosure of information [12], [42] and their display of active participation behaviour [8], [9], [11].

Facilitation was especially related to patients’ expression of concerns and cues, but was unrelated to patients’ questions or assertive utterances. This may indicate that patients tend to utter their questions and opinions more

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and physicians who participated in the study. Furthermore, we thank Robert Hulsman and Heleen Dekker, who participated in the coding of the videotaped encounters, and Marcel Levi for his useful comments. Finally we render thanks to the Board of Directors of the Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, who funded this study. This paper was presented at the International Conference on Communication in Healthcare in Chicago, October 2005.

References (54)

  • H. Eide et al.

    Physician–patient dialogue surrounding patients’ expression of concern: applying sequence analysis to RIAS

    Soc Sci Med

    (2004)
  • L.C. Zandbelt et al.

    Determinants of physicians’ patient-centred behaviour in the medical specialist encounter

    Soc Sci Med

    (2006)
  • D.L. Roter et al.

    Patient–physician communication: a descriptive summary of the literature

    Patient Educ Couns

    (1988)
  • J. Harrington et al.

    Improving patients’ communication with doctors: a systematic review of intervention studies

    Patient Educ Couns

    (2004)
  • S. Michie et al.

    Patient-centredness in chronic illness: what is it and does it matter?

    Patient Educ Couns

    (2003)
  • M. Stewart et al.

    Patient-centered medicine transforming the clinical method

    (1995)
  • J.H. Levenstein et al.

    The patient-centred clinical method. 1. A model for the doctor–patient interaction in family medicine

    Fam Pract

    (1986)
  • R.C. Smith et al.

    The patient's story: integrating the patient- and physician-centered approaches to interviewing

    Ann Intern Med

    (1991)
  • R.L.J. Street et al.

    Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters

    Health Commun

    (2001)
  • Wissow LS, Roter D, Bauman LJ, Crain E, Kercsmar C, Weiss K, et al. Patient-provider communication during the emergency...
  • M.M. Ward et al.

    Participatory patient–physician communication and morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2003)
  • C.H. Kindler et al.

    A quantitative analysis of anaesthetist-patient communication during the pre-operative visit

    Anaesthesia

    (2005)
  • A.L. Suchman et al.

    A model of empathic communication in the medical interview

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1997)
  • S.H. Kaplan et al.

    Assessing the effects of physician–patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease

    Med Care

    (1989)
  • D.W. Cecil et al.

    Control, compliance, and satisfaction in the family practice encounter

    Fam Med

    (1997)
  • M.T. Donohoe

    Comparing generalist and specialty care: discrepancies, deficiencies, and excesses

    Arch Intern Med

    (1998)
  • P.N. Butow et al.

    Oncologists’ reactions to cancer patients’ verbal cues

    Psychooncology

    (2002)
  • Cited by (78)

    • Examining the relationship between clinician communication and patient participatory behaviors in cardiology encounters

      2022, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition to patient factors, clinicians clearly also play an important role. Clinician facilitating behaviors and partnership-building have been associated with increased patient participation in primary care as well as some specialties such as oncology [15,18]. These behaviors have not been examined in cardiology clinics.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text