A note on the relevance of the q-exponential function in the context of intertemporal choices

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.08.056Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper shows that the q-exponential function well known in the deformed algebra inspired in the Tsallis's nonextensive thermodynamics may be used to model discount functions in intertemporal choices which present the phenomenon known as increasing patience. Moreover, we show that this insight may also be used to provide a measure of the degree of dynamic inconsistency presented in such decisions.

Introduction

A large part of the behavioral economic literature has been paying attention to a deviation from the expected utility theory known as dynamic inconsistency. Dynamic consistency requires that the ranking of consumption streams be unchanged over time. But, empirical evidence has shown that this is not true in all situations [1], [2], [3], [4]. For example, if people are asked to choose between (a1) $1000 in 1 year and (a2) $1050 in 1 year and 1 week or (b1) $1000 today and (b2) $1050 in 1 week, then according to the expected utility theory someone who chooses (a2) in the first situation must choose (b2) in the second situation. However, greater impatience for immediate rewards can make one choose (a2) and (b1).

According to [5], the only way for agents to achieve intertemporal consistency is to discount the cash flows from all delayed events by a constant rate-per-time unit. Therefore, in the context of the classical expected theory, the exponential function has played a fundamental role.1 The problem is that with the discounting supported by the exponential function, the phenomena presented in the example above cannot be modelled. For that reason, the hyperbolic discount was introduced [6] as an alternative to the exponential discount model in order to take the phenomena of increasing impatience described above into account.

In this paper, I introduce the definition of the q-exponential utility function based on the q-exponential function discount which is an extension of both previous ideas: (1) the concept of the classical utility function based on exponential discount and (2) the concept of the hyperbolic utility function based on the hyperbolic discount. Actually, the q-exponential is a very well-known function in the deformed algebra inspired in nonextensive thermodynamics [7] and was very well studied by [8].

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the q-exponential function is introduced. In Section 3, an example of intertemporal choice is presented. Finally, Section 4 presents some conclusions of this work.

Section snippets

The q-exponential utility function

The q-exponential utility function can be defined asU(x1,x2,,xT)=t=1Tβq(t)u(xt),where u is an instantaneous utility function, T is a fixed time in the future and βq(t), the q-exponential discount, is the inverse of the q-exponential function given byβq(t)=1eq(αt)=1[1+(1-q)αt]1/(1-q)with q[0,1]. One should note that when q1 then βq(t) recovers the classical exponential discount. On the other hand, when q=0 then βq(t) yields the hyperbolic discount [9]. Moreover, the definition of the q

The buffer-stock problem with q-exponential discount

In this paper, the buffer-stock problem2 with q

Conclusions

This paper has introduced a very interesting connection between the Tsallis's thermodynamic statistics and behavioral economics6 by means of the q-exponential function.

Moreover, it has been shown that the q-exponential function can be used to take the phenomena known as increasing patience into account and the parameter q can be seen as a

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express his gratitude to one anonymous referee who made several important suggestions that helped the improvement of the paper.

References (20)

  • K.N. Kirby et al.

    Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process.

    (1995)
  • M. Van der Pol et al.

    J. Econ. Behav. Organ.

    (2002)
  • E.P. Borges

    Physica A

    (2004)
  • C. Tsallis

    Chaos, Solitons and Fractals

    (1995)
  • C. Tsallis et al.

    Physica A

    (2003)
  • I. Matsuba et al.

    Physica A

    (2003)
  • E.P. Borges

    Physica A

    (2004)
  • J. Cairnes et al.

    J. Econ. Psychology

    (2000)
  • L.R. Keller, E. Strazzera, Examining predictive accuracy among discounting models, J. Risk Uncertainty 24 (2) (2002)...
  • P. Samuelson

    Rev. Econ. Stud.

    (1937)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (79)

  • A Tsallis-like effective exponential delay discounting model and its implications

    2022, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
  • Power law dynamics in genealogical graphs

    2022, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
  • The personal wealth importance to the intertemporal choice

    2021, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text