Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 89, Issue 2, 30 September 2006, Pages 281-286
Physiology & Behavior

Oral exposure and sensory-specific satiety

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.06.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Satiety has been shown after oral exposure to food that was chewed but not eaten (Modified Sham Feeding (MSF)). The aim of the study was to explore the role of sensory-specific satiety (SSS) in satiety development with MSF. Subjects were studied on three test days in a randomized crossover design; they received, in random order, water, MSF, or a meal. At the start and the end of each course of the lunch condition subjects evaluated appetite sensations, taste perception and pleasantness of taste using Visual Analogue Scales. SSS was present when eating soup and salad. SSS also occurred with MSF of salad. When eating the soup no significant changes in appetite ratings occurred. Hunger decreased and satiety increased while the salad was eaten (p < 0.0004). In this condition taste perception did not change significantly and a decrease in pleasantness coincided with an increase in satiety. During the MSF salad taste perception changed, i.e. creaminess and intensity increased (p < 0.05 and p < 0.02, respectively). When the salad was eaten satiety increased and hunger and desire to eat (DTE) decreased. Chewing the salad resulted only in a decrease in DTE. In this experiment merely chewing a salad produced SSS. We conclude that when SSS takes place during feeding, it is related to an increase in satiety, and a decrease in hunger and DTE. With SSS during MSF, satiety does not increase, nor does hunger decrease, yet DTE decreases. Thus MSF is sufficient for a sensory decrease in DTE despite of lack of satiety.

Introduction

As a food is consumed to satiety, its perceived pleasantness of taste declines compared to that of foods that have not been consumed. This phenomenon is referred to as sensory-specific satiety [1]. These declines in pleasantness of taste are greatest within the first 20 min following consumption, suggesting that these effects are primarily based on sensory cues, and less on postingestive or postabsorptive cues. Sensory-specific satiety promotes the consumption of meals with greater nutrient variety and thus may lead to increased intake [1], [2]. The magnitude of sensory-specific satiety of a specific food is dependent on its texture, flavour and colour [3], [4]. Although it has been reported that the macronutrient composition of a food also appears to influence its sensory-specific satiety [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], the time framing of SSS and the finding that one does not need ingestion suggest that SSS is a sensory-based phenomenon [4], i.e. foods high in protein, sweet carbohydrates and fatty acids have been suggested to have a relatively greater sensory-specific satiety [6], [7], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Accordingly, Modified Sham Feeding (MSF) showed that the specific metabolites triggered by sensory perception give rise to sensory satiety [15]. Experiments using oral stimulation may shed some light on the consequences of vagal stimulation with food. Previous oral stimulation experiments using the MSF technique have revealed effects on metabolites, hormones and satiety [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. MSF experiments performed by Mattes and Jackson and colleagues have shown that fat can be tasted [17], [19], [20], [21], [22], and had subsequent effects in particular with butter compared with after oral exposure to fat replacers [20]. Studies investigating the relative contribution of oral, gastric and intestinal exposure to food on satiation and satiety have shown that orosensory information is essential in the process of satiety development and appetite regulation. Oral exposure to food enhances the effects of gastric and intestinal exposure to food on appetite and subsequent food intake [27], [28], [29], [30].

Experiments performed by Rolls et al. gave insight in the neural mechanisms of sensory-specific satiety. They have shown that the identity of the taste is represented in the primary taste cortex, and the hedonic quality of the taste is computed and represented in the secondary taste cortex [31], [32], [33]. In humans the orbitofrontal cortex seems to be related to the hedonic evaluation of a food and thus to sensory-specific satiety.

In addition to sensory-specific satiety for a food eaten to satiety, other forms of sensory-specific satiety have been observed such as olfactory and visual sensory-specific satiety [4], [34]. In an experiment conducted by Rolls and Rolls chewing foods, without swallowing them, for as long they would be eaten in a meal, was enough to produce sensory-specific satiety [4]. However, the decrease in pleasantness of taste of the chewed food was not as large as the decrease in pleasantness of taste of the eaten food. In this experiment also a significant reduction in the intensity of both the taste of the chewed and eaten food was observed. The authors conclude that olfactory stimulation together with food in the mouth is, at least partially, able to produce sensory-specific satiety, without the presence of food in the gastrointestinal system.

In a recent experiment we observed a short increase in feelings of satiety following oral fat stimulation (without food ingestion) in the postprandial state [15]. This short increase in rated satiety following MSF is probably the result of the cephalic response in the satiety cascade. We hypothesised that this short increase in rated satiety is mainly sensory in nature. Therefore we approached the issue by analyzing the possible difference in SSS between after a food is sham-fed and after it is eaten.

Sensory-specific satiety appears to play a role when offering subjects a variety of foods that may be identical in composition, but differ in sensory properties; this increases food and energy intake [35]. Interestingly, in all of the experiments comparing ad libitum food intake of variety of foods to ad libitum food intake of a single food which have assessed subjective appetite sensations, changes in feelings of hunger and satiety do not differ between eating until satiated on a single course meal from eating until satiated on a multiple course meal; variety increased intake, while there was no diet effect on hunger ratings [36], [37], [38].

Hence, appetite sensations and taste perception may mainly contribute to the complexity of sensory-specific satiety, but to what extend and do they interact? To investigate the sensory role in sensory-specific satiety we made a distinction between oral exposure (in this experiment Modified Sham Feeding also referred to as ‘chewed’) and oral exposure plus gastrointestinal exposure (in this experiment eating). We studied sensory-specific satiety and changes in the appetite profile as well as changes in taste perception in a two-course meal comparing Modified Sham Feeding to eating the meal.

Section snippets

Subjects

Twenty-four subjects were recruited for this study (6 males and 18 females). The subjects were screened on health, medication, smoking and dieting parameters; they had to be normal weight and dietary unrestraint. The subjects had a mean ± S.D. age of 23 ± 6.9 years, and had a BMI of 22.2 ± 1.3. Their mean ± S.D. restrained eating score on the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire of the female and male subjects was 3.3 ± 3 and 2.0 ± 2.1, respectively [39]. All subjects were healthy, not taking medication,

Results

The subjects rated the palatability of the soup and the salad, which were completely novel to them, 65 ± 16 mm and 68 ± 16 mm, respectively. The weights of the MSF meal before and after chewing were compared; this yielded a mean (± S.E.M.) recovery rate of 101.8 ± 8.7%. The average number of spoons of soup was in both conditions (MSF and eating) 24 ± 5 spoons. The average number of bites of salad was in the MSF condition 26 ± 8 bites and in the eating condition 32 ± 8 bites (p < 0.02, unpaired Student's t

Discussion

The definition of sensory-specific satiety (SSS) states that when a food is consumed to satiety, its perceived pleasantness of taste declines compared to that of foods that have not been consumed. It appeared that SSS also occurred when not every aspect of the original definition is present. Even when a food is eaten, but not to satiety SSS occurred, which was the case with the soup as well as with the salad. Moreover, even in the case of the MSF salad SSS also occurred. It is likely that

Acknowledgements

We thank Chantalle Moors for her contributions to the study.

References (63)

  • K. Vandewater et al.

    Higher-protein foods produce greater sensory-specific satiety

    Physiol Behav

    (1996)
  • R.D. Mattes

    Oral fat exposure alters postprandial lipid metabolism in humans

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1996)
  • R.D. Mattes

    Oral exposure to butter, but not fat replacers elevates postprandial triacylglycerol concentration in humans

    J Nutr

    (2001)
  • R.D. Mattes

    The taste of fat elevates postprandial triacylglycerol

    Physiol Behav

    (2001)
  • R.D. Mattes

    Oral fat exposure increases the first phase triacylglycerol concentration due to release of stored lipid in humans

    J Nutr

    (2002)
  • M.D. Robertson et al.

    Prolonged effects of modified sham feeding on energy substrate mobilization

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2001)
  • M.D. Robertson et al.

    Timing of vagal stimulation affects postprandial lipid metabolism in humans

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2002)
  • J.E. Cecil et al.

    Relative contributions of intestinal, gastric, oro-sensory influences and information to changes in appetite induced by the same liquid meal

    Appetite

    (1998)
  • J.E. Cecil et al.

    Comparison of the effects of a high-fat and high-carbohydrate soup delivered orally and intragastrically on gastric emptying, appetite, and eating behaviour

    Physiol Behav

    (1999)
  • S.J. French et al.

    Oral, gastric and intestinal influences on human feeding

    Physiol Behav

    (2001)
  • E.T. Rolls

    Taste, olfactory, and food texture processing in the brain, and the control of food intake

    Physiol Behav

    (2005)
  • L.L. Baylis et al.

    Afferent connections of the caudolateral orbitofrontal cortex taste area of the primate

    Neuroscience

    (1995)
  • E.T. Rolls et al.

    Sensory-specific and motivation-specific satiety for the sight and taste of food and water in man

    Physiol Behav

    (1983)
  • L. Wisniewski et al.

    Effect of food change on consumption, hedonics, and salivation

    Physiol Behav

    (1992)
  • M. Porrini et al.

    Weight, protein, fat, and timing of preloads affect food intake

    Physiol Behav

    (1997)
  • A.J. Stunkard et al.

    The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger

    J Psychosom Res

    (1985)
  • H.R. Berthoud

    Multiple neural systems controlling food intake and body weight

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (2002)
  • H.R. Berthoud

    Mind versus metabolism in the control of food intake and energy balance

    Physiol Behav

    (2004)
  • M. Hetherington et al.

    The time course of sensory-specific satiety

    Appetite

    (1989)
  • T. Tuomisto et al.

    Reasons for initiation and cessation of eating in obese men and women and the affective consequences of eating in everyday situations

    Appetite

    (1998)
  • D.G. Mook et al.

    How important is hedonism? Reasons given by college students for ending a meal

    Appetite

    (1992)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text