Elsevier

Plant Science

Volume 168, Issue 3, March 2005, Pages 747-759
Plant Science

Oxidative stress induced by the photosensitizers neutral red (type I) or rose bengal (type II) in the light causes different molecular responses in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.10.008Get rights and content

Abstract

The molecular defense mechanisms against photooxidative stress in photosynthetic organisms are essential to protect cells from damaging effects of high light illumination and photoinhibition but also to protect against effects by endogenous and exogenous photosensitizers. Here, we analyzed the genetic response of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to the model type I photosensitizer neutral red (NR) and the type II photosensitizer rose bengal (RB) using DNA-microarrays. Many oxidative and general stress response genes, which were also induced by other oxidative stress conditions, were strongly induced by NR. Only one gene was upregulated by RB, the glutathione (GSH) peroxidase homologous gene Gpxh, which was also induced by NR. In addition NR exposure resulted in the reduced expression of most nuclear photosynthetic genes and subunits of the light harvesting complex (LHC) indicating an effect on the photosynthetic activity. This is supported by a stimulation of singlet oxygen generation in NR-treated thylakoids. Thus, in C. reinhardtii the Gpxh expression is most probably induced by the formation of singlet oxygen in both the NR and RB-treated cells via the activation of a very sensitive and specific sensor, whereas general oxidative stress response mechanisms seem to be involved in the response of most other genes to the type I photooxidative stress.

Introduction

In photosynthetic organisms, the increased formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide (O2radical dot), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radicals (OHradical dot) and singlet oxygen (1O2) is a major source for oxidative stress and cellular damages. Especially in the thylakoid membranes, where the photosynthetic light harvesting complex (LHC) absorbs light energy and drives the electron transport chain in the photosystems I and II (PSI and PSII), increased amounts of ROS are generated by uncontrolled electron transfer reactions [1]. High light intensities enhance the rate of charge recombination and triplet chlorophyll formation in the PSII, resulting in the increased production of 1O2 and photoinhibition [2], [3], [4], [5]. Thus, the strict regulation of the excitation of the photosystems or other endogenous photosensitizers, such as porphyrins, and the fast induction of defense mechanisms against oxidative stress is crucial for photosynthetic organisms. Several mechanisms have been described to be involved in the regulation of the responses due to light-induced stresses. Some ROS such as O2radical dot and H2O2 have been shown to directly act as second messengers to regulate the expression of defense genes, including glutathione (GSH) peroxidases, glutathione-S-transferases (GST) and ascorbate peroxidases [1]. For other responses, the redox status of the glutathione or the plastoquinone pool was identified to trigger the response, including the control of gene expression [6], [7], [8]. However, unraveling the specific mechanism responsible for the induction of a gene is in many cases difficult because some of the potential signals, e.g. ROS production and redox status of the plastoquinone pool, are tightly linked during photosynthesis.

By using exogenous photosensitizers, the problem of such linked signals may be partially eliminated. Upon absorption of visible light and entering an excited state, such photosensitizers induce a photooxidative stress independent of the photosynthetic activity. In the presence of oxygen, excited photosensitizers can react in two ways: direct electron transfer to the substrate usually results in a semi-reduced form of the photosensitizer and a semi-oxidized form of the substrate, which becomes fully oxidized upon binding molecular oxygen (type I) [9], [10]. Neutral red (NR), a phenazine-based dye widely used for staining cellular particles and as an intracellular pH indicator, has been used as a photosensitizer in phototherapy and was reported to interact with several substrates in a type I reaction [11], [12], [13]. The second reaction type involves the transfer of the excitation energy from the photosensitizer to molecular oxygen, resulting in the formation of 1O2 (type II) [10]. Rose bengal (RB) and methylene blue are two typical type II photosensitizers, known to mainly generate 1O2 when excited by light in the visible range [14], [15], [16]. Thus, exposure of organisms to RB in the light may specifically induce the genetic response to increased generation of 1O2, whereas NR rather activates the response to free radicals-induced oxidative stress.

Recently, we have shown, that the glutathione peroxidase homologous gene Gpxh from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is transcriptionally upregulated by the exogenous photosensitizers RB and methylene blue in the light, most probably through the formation of 1O2 [17], [18]. Interestingly, Gpxh expression is also strongly induced by the addition of NR under illumination with kinetics that are similar to the RB-induced response, suggesting the presence of a common mechanism for types I and II photosensitizer-induced Gpxh expression in C. reinhardtii. However, exposure to O2radical dot, H2O2 or organic hydroperoxides only caused a slightly induced Gpxh expression, indicating that a specific rather than a general oxidative stress regulates the Gpxh transcription. In order to understand the Gpxh response in the presence of type I or type II photosensitizers, we wanted to study the NR and RB-induced responses in C. reinhardtii and compare these responses with other oxidative stress-induced effects. DNA-microarrays are a good method to compare the genetic response caused by different conditions, enabling to measure the expression levels of large sets of genes in one experiment [19]. In C. reinhardtii, the collection of cDNA sequences in an expressed sequence-tag (EST) library has recently led to the development of a first series of DNA-microarrays containing 2876 spots, representing approximately 2700 unique genes of the C. reinhardtii nuclear genome [20], [21]. We used these microarrays to study the genetic response of C. reinhardtii cells exposed to either a type I (NR) or a type II (RB) photosensitizer in the light. Additionally, we compared the response to these photosensitizers with gene expression profiles caused by other oxidative stress conditions. This could give more information about the nature and specificity of the defence mechanisms and the signals, triggering the activation of genes involved in the photooxidative stress response, in particular of the Gpxh gene.

Section snippets

Strains and culture conditions

C. reinhardtii strain cw15arg7mt (CC-1618), generously provided by E. Harris, was inoculated in Tris–acetate–phosphate-medium (TAP) [22] in Erlenmeyer flasks and agitated on a rotatory shaker (150 rpm) under constant illumination (120 μmol m−2 s−1 PAR) at 25 °C. All media were supplemented with 50 mg/l ampicillin and 50 mg/l arginine.

Chemicals

NR, RB and menadione (Fluka, Buchs SG, Switzerland) were dissolved in water and stored as 1 mM or 10 mM stock solutions at 4 °C in the dark. H2O2 (Merck, Whitehouse

RB and NR-induced effects in C. reinhardtii

The stress response of C. reinhardtii cells, either exposed to type I or type II photosensitizers, was analyzed by determining the gene expression profiles of cultures exposed to NR or RB in the light. In order to know the type and severity of stress caused by a certain concentration of photosensitizer, different parameters were analyzed in strain cw15arg7 mt exposed to NR and RB under illumination of 120 μmol m−2 s−1. First, lethal concentrations of NR and RB in the light were determined by

RB causes little stress response but strongly induces the Gpxh expression

In this study, we investigated the transcriptional responses of C. reinhardtii to the type I photosensitizer NR and the 1O2-producing photosensitizer RB to unravel the similarities and difference in the expression pattern caused by the two substances and to compare them with the profiles induced by other oxidative stress conditions. The photosynthetic green alga C. reinhardtii is an excellent model organism for such research purposes since it can be grown under well-defined laboratory

Acknowledgements

All genomic sequence data were produced by the US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (JGI) and are provided for use in this publication only. We thank Katrin Brombacher, Karin Rüfenacht and Alexander J.B. Zehnder for stimulating discussions and continuous support. The study was financially supported by Emhart Glass SA, Cham (Switzerland).

References (72)

  • A. Trebst et al.

    A specific role for tocopherol and of chemical singlet oxygen quenchers in the maintenance of photosystem II structure and function in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

    FEBS Lett.

    (2002)
  • O.W. Griffith

    Biologic and pharmacologic regulation of mammalian glutathione synthesis

    Free Radic. Biol. Med.

    (1999)
  • D.P. Dixon et al.

    Plant glutathione transferases

    Genome Biol.

    (2002)
  • A. Goyer et al.

    Isolation and characterization of a thioredoxin-dependent peroxidase from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

    Eur. J. Biochem.

    (2002)
  • E.R. Waters

    The molecular evolution of the small heat-shock proteins in plants

    Genetics

    (1995)
  • G.J. Lee et al.

    A small heat shock protein cooperates with heat shock protein 70 systems to reactivate a heat-denatured protein

    Plant Physiol.

    (2000)
  • T. Grune et al.

    Selective degradation of oxidatively modified protein substrates by the proteasome

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (2003)
  • H. Fu et al.

    Molecular organization of the 20S proteasome gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana

    Genetics

    (1998)
  • G. Basset et al.

    Changes in the expression and the enzymic properties of the 20S proteasome in sugar-starved maize roots. Evidence for an in vivo oxidation of the proteasome

    Plant Physiol.

    (2002)
  • P.J. Nixon

    Chlororespiration

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.

    (2000)
  • P. Bennoun

    Chlororespiration and the process of carotenoid biosynthesis

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2001)
  • R.G. op den Camp et al.

    Rapid induction of distinct stress responses after the release of singlet oxygen in Arabidopsis

    Plant Cell

    (2003)
  • S.W. Ryter et al.

    Singlet molecular oxygen (1O2): a possible effector of eukaryotic gene expression

    Free Radic. Biol. Med.

    (1998)
  • S.P. Stratton et al.

    Determination of singlet oxygen-specific versus radical-mediated lipid peroxidation in photosensitized oxidation of lipid bilayers: effect of beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol

    Biochemistry

    (1997)
  • J. Dat et al.

    Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses

    Cell. Mol. Life Sci.

    (2000)
  • N. Keren et al.

    State transition and photoinhibition

  • E. Hideg et al.

    Do oxidative stress conditions impairing photosynthesis in the light manifest as photoinhibition?

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.

    (2000)
  • S. Karpinski et al.

    Photosynthetic electron transport regulates the expression of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase genes in Arabidopsis during excess light stress

    Plant Cell.

    (1997)
  • K.C. Smith

    The Science of Photobiology

    (1981)
  • C.S. Foote

    Definition of type-I and type-II photosensitized oxidation

    Photochem. Photobiol.

    (1991)
  • M.K. Singh et al.

    Photophysical properties of the cationic form of neutral red

    Photochem. Photobiol.

    (1999)
  • M.K. Singh et al.

    Interaction of the excited singlet state of neutral red with aromatic amines

    Photochem. Photobiol.

    (2000)
  • G.T. Marks et al.

    Transient photochemistry of neutral red

    Photochem. Photobiol.

    (1984)
  • P.C. Lee et al.

    Laser flash photokinetic studies of rose bengal sensitized photodynamic interactions of nucleotides and DNA

    Photochem. Photobiol.

    (1987)
  • M. Tomita et al.

    Sensitized photooxidation of histidine and its derivatives. Products and mechanism of the reaction

    Biochemistry

    (1969)
  • C.R. Lambert et al.

    Intensity-dependent enzyme photosensitization using 532 nm nanosecond laser pulses

    Photochem. Photobiol.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Molecular chaperones, proteases, and unfolded protein responses

      2023, The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook: Volume 2: Organellar and Metabolic Processes
    • Glutathione peroxidase 5 deficiency induces lipid metabolism regulated by reactive oxygen species in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

      2020, Microbial Pathogenesis
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, the nonselenocysteine glutathione peroxidase GPX5 detoxifies hydrogen peroxide using cytosolic thioredoxin as an electron donor instead of glutathione [4,5]. It was reported that 1O2 generated by the photosensitizer Rose Bengal (RB) could powerfully induced the expression of GPX5 in C. reinhardtii [4,6,7]. A C. reinhardtii gpx5 knockout mutant displayed decreased lipid droplet (LD) synthesis compared with the parental strain CC4348 [8].

    • Features of cues and processes during chloroplast-mediated retrograde signaling in the alga Chlamydomonas

      2018, Plant Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      In Chlamydomonas, acclimation responses to HL include 1O2-mediated retrograde pathways leading to the induction, among others, of the nuclear-encoded glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase, and a σ-class glutathione-S-transferase, all involved in the enzymatic antioxidant defenses. Thus, it has been proposed that 1O2 photodynamically produced at PSII can function as a signaling molecule during HL exposure, a phenomenon that can be mimicked also by treatment with exogenous photosensitizer Rose Bengal [111,113–116]. Interestingly, traces of 1O2 specifically generated at PSII during HL have been visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy in the cytosol of Chlamydomonas cell.

    • Acclimation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to ultraviolet radiation and its impact on chemical toxicity

      2015, Aquatic Toxicology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other 1O2 tolerance mechanisms might be related to the function of GPXH, a thioredoxin-dependent peroxidase and GSTS1, a glutathione-S-transferase (Fischer et al., 2009). In C. reinhardtii, the expression of GPXH and GSTS1 is rapidly upregulated upon exposure to RB (Fischer et al., 2005; Ledford et al., 2007) and UVR (Cheloni et al., 2014). Taken together, these studies and the present study provide evidence for a common toxic mechanism of UVR and RB, most likely the generation of 1O2, and a common cellular response pathway in C. reinhardtii.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Institute of Biology II, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestr. 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.

    View full text