Elsevier

Psychiatry Research

Volume 186, Issues 2–3, 30 April 2011, Pages 443-445
Psychiatry Research

Brief report
Criminal recidivism in offenders with personality disorders and substance use disorders over 8 years of time at risk

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.08.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Personality disorders (PD) and substance use disorders (SUD) lead to high violent criminality. The influence of co-morbidity on recidivism remains unclear. Recidivism of 379 offenders was assessed at 8 years of follow-up. Sixty-nine percent of PD + SUD, 45% of SUD- and 33% of PD- subjects showed any recidivism. However, violent recidivism was highest in the PD- group.

Introduction

There is a high risk of violent recidivism in offenders in many countries (Grann et al., 2008). It is well known that clinical data, particularly the diagnosis of either personality disorder (PD) or substance use disorder (SUD), are associated with an increased risk of recidivism in criminals (Asnis et al., 1997). However, less is known about the influence of the common co-morbidity of these two disorders on general and violent criminal recidivism.

Prior studies have shown that half or more individuals with Cluster B PDs, mainly antisocial and borderline personality disorders, have co-occurring alcohol use disorder or drug use disorder (Verheul, 2001, Walter et al., 2009). However, it is not clear whether the co-occurrence of both disorders is also related to higher recidivism in criminals.

It has been argued that particularly the psychopathic traits increase the risk of violent behavior and recidivism (Dolan and Doyle, 2000). Psychopathic traits including impulsive–aggressive behavior, affective shallowness, and social maladjustment are associated with a high risk of violent behavior (Kiehl, 2006) and with violent recidivism in long-term outcome studies measured by Hare's Psychopathy Checklist (PCL) (Stone, 2002).

This is the first study that investigates specific recidivism rates in criminals with PDs and co-occurring SUD, compared to other diagnostic groups with PDs and SUDs only. This study used reliable and independent diagnostic assessments, and prospectively collected data over 8 years of follow-up to investigate the risk of criminal recidivism in these different diagnostic groups, and to analyze the simple recidivism as well as the violent recidivism. A priori we expected the highest simple and violent recidivism rate in criminals with PDs and co-occurring SUD.

Section snippets

Subjects

All 379 defendants were included who were subject to court orders for forensic psychiatric evaluation from the Forensic Psychiatry Clinic of the University of Basel for criminal responsibility, risk assessment and the need for forensic treatment, between 1989 and 2000. Two hundred sixty-seven were diagnosed as suffering from personality disorders (PD-), substance use disorders (SUD-), and 112 offenders had other psychiatric diagnoses. Eighty-five percent were males and the median age was 33.4

Personality disorders and substance use disorders

Most criminals had only one personality disorder diagnosis. However, 43% in either group suffered from two or more personality disorders. As shown in Table 1, there was a significant higher rate of Cluster A PDs in the PD- group, than in the PD + SUD group (χ2 = 48.07, d.f. = 1, p < 0.0001). The frequency of Cluster B and Cluster C PDs did not differ between these two groups (PD- and PD + SUD). At baseline, the rates for current alcohol use disorder and drug use disorder were not different in the two

Discussion

As expected, we found that criminals with both PD and SUD had a two-fold higher risk for general recidivism than the PD group without co-occurring SUD. The higher overall recidivism rate for this group supports previous results that found poorer treatment outcome, including worse psychosocial functioning, more problematic substance use, and more legal problems in patients with substance use disorders and co-occurring personality disorders (Galen et al., 2000). This co-morbidity is very common,

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (43)

  • The predictability of the Addiction Severity Index criminal justice assessment instrument and future imprisonment: A Swedish registry study with a national sample of adults with risky substance use

    2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
    Citation Excerpt :

    There exists a clear linkage between risky substance use, addiction and criminality (Bennett and Holloway, 2009; Boden et al., 2013; Bukten et al., 2011; Dietze et al., 2013; Fazel et al., 2006; Fridell et al., 2008). Even though previous research has demonstrated the role of risky substance use and the association with criminality (Bennett and Holloway, 2009; Boden et al., 2012; Dietze et al., 2013; Fazel et al., 2006; Larney and Martire, 2010; Stewart et al., 2000; Walter et al., 2011), limited research exists regarding the capacity of the ASI assessment instrument as a tool to predict the likelihood of future imprisonment for clients assessed for risky substance use. Hence, the study presented here, using Swedish registry data both from the national Addiction Severity Index database and the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention, aims to identify among adult individuals all assessed for risky substance use, the associations of the Addiction Severity Index Composite Scores (CSs) with future imprisonment controlling for age, level of education and gender.

  • Personality disorder and substance use disorder – An update

    2018, Mental Health and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    Two specific PDs are particularly frequently diagnosed together with substance use problems: the borderline personality disorder (BPD) and the antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). Both disorders are associated with higher impulsivity and aggressive behavior (Walter, Wiesbeck, Dittmann, & Graf, 2011). ASPD is categorized by a pattern of disrespect and violation of the privileges of others, and BPD by a pattern of relational and emotional instability as well as impulsivity.

  • Distinct pathological profiles of inmates showcasing cluster B personality traits, mental disorders and substance use regarding violent behaviors

    2018, Psychiatry Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, their severe criminality may be at least partly explained by their significant impulsivity and substance use in the group. The additional consumption of substances (alcohol, stimulants and cannabis) has been shown to promote criminal and violent behavior (Fergusson and Horwood, 2000; Fridell et al., 2008; Pihl and Sutton, 2009; Black et al., 2010; Walter et al., 2011) as well as impulsivity (Dougherty et al., 2004; Bornovalova et al., 2005). Cluster 4, named the “Early-onset unstable-mentally ill delinquents”, arises as a severely borderline and criminal group.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text