Elsevier

Public Health

Volume 119, Issue 5, May 2005, Pages 361-370
Public Health

Approaches to increase physical activity: reviewing the evidence for exercise-referral schemes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2004.06.008Get rights and content

Summary

Objective

To review current evidence of effectiveness for exercise-referral schemes.

Methods

Studies were identified from MEDLINE 1966–2002, EMBASE 1980–2002 and CINHAL 1982–2002 and bibliographies of relevant papers.

Inclusion criteria

Interventions providing access to exercise activities and/or facilities, experimental or quasi-experimental studies, studies with a control group, interventions based in a primary care setting, and interventions including an exercise component with measures of physical activity levels.

Conclusions

Exercise-referral schemes appear to increase physical activity levels in certain populations, namely individuals who are not sedentary but already slightly active, older adults and those who are overweight (but not obese). However, increases in the level of physical activity may not be sustained over time. Further studies are required to assess effectiveness in a range of populations and for different activities, and to find strategies to increase long-term adherence.

Introduction

Physical inactivity is associated with increased cardiovascular disease, hypertension, being overweight and the development of type 2 diabetes.1 In the UK, it is estimated that as much as 37% of coronary heart disease is due to physical inactivity.2 To maintain cardiorespiratory fitness, the Department of Health recommends at least 30 min of moderate-intensity activity on 5 or more days of the week.3 However, approximately 70% of the population of England are not active at this level.4

Despite the significance for public health, effective strategies to encourage people to become more active have yet to be identified. Kahn et al.5 identified three types of intervention to promote physical activity in the community (Fig. 1). Informational approaches aim to increase physical activity by providing information that will motivate people to change their behaviour. These approaches often complement the medical model of disease management, for instance by supporting the management of cardiovascular disease. Behavioural and social approaches are often based on health-promotion models in order to change individual and group behaviour. A third approach aims to increase opportunities for physical activity by providing access to exercise facilities or activities. In the UK, many National Health Service (NHS) primary care organizations have adopted the latter approach. These schemes, often called exercise-referral or exercise-prescription schemes, offer a diverse range of exercise activities and facilities to which clinicians in general practice can refer their patients. This paper reviews current evidence for the effectiveness of exercise-referral schemes.

Section snippets

Methods

The following electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE 1966–2002, Excerpta Medica (EMBASE) 1980–2002 and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) 1982–2002. Key words included ‘exercise’, ‘physical fitness’, ‘primary health care’, ‘referral’, ‘prescription’ and ‘physical activity’. Only English language publications were included. Bibliographies of all relevant papers were searched to identify further papers. Studies were reviewed if they met the following criteria:

Results

Three reviews of exercise interventions were identified. Two papers by Hillsdon and Thorogood7, 8 did not focus specifically on exercise-referral schemes but rather on the promotion of physical activity in the community. A third review by Riddoch et al.9 considered promotion of physical activity in primary care. However, only three studies included in their review met our inclusion criteria. These studies were also identified by our search strategy. In total, 159 studies were identified. One

UK studies

Taylor et al.15 conducted a randomized controlled trial within an existing general-practitioner-referral scheme. A total of 389 patients aged 40–70 years who were smokers, hypertensive or overweight were identified from medical records. Both control and intervention groups received leaflets about the prevention of coronary heart disease. In addition, the intervention group was referred to a local leisure centre for a 10-week period without formal supervision. Physical activity was measured by

Non-UK studies

King et al.17 randomized healthy, sedentary men and women aged 50–65 years in California to receive either group-based or home-based exercise interventions over 12 months. A random-digit telephone survey and advertisements identified 357 predominantly white (89%) individuals of which about 20% were current smokers. Participants were allocated at random into four treatment arms: assessment-only controls, low-intensity home-based exercise (five 30-min sessions/week), high-intensity home-based

Discussion

In general, the UK studies evaluated interventions similar to those currently found in primary care, while the non-UK studies would be difficult to reproduce in a service setting. Recruitment in most non-UK studies was via media advertising or telephone surveys rather than from general practice lists, and potential participants were more likely to be excluded on health grounds (usually cardiovascular). This may have resulted in recruitment of a highly select group of volunteers who were

Conclusion

Exercise-referral schemes appear to increase physical activity levels in certain populations, although the effect may wear off over time. Low recruitment and adherence has important cost-effectiveness implications that may put such schemes at a disadvantage when competing for already scarce NHS resources. However, exercise-referral schemes mainly use existing infrastructure and, when targeted at ‘almost-active’ populations, they may present an important public health opportunity. Nevertheless,

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Dr Melanie Smith for her comments on successive drafts. Oliver Morgan is funded by the National Health Service London Deanery of Postgraduate Dental and Medical Education.

References (25)

  • E. Kahn et al.

    The effectivness of interventions to increase physical activity

    Am J Prev Med

    (2002)
  • E. McAuley

    Enhancing exercise adherence in middle-aged males and females

    Prev Med

    (1994)
  • US Department of Health and Human Resources. A report for the surgeon general. Physical activity and health. National...
  • British Heart Foundation. Coronary heart disease statistics....
  • Department of Health. More people, more active, more often. physical activity in England. A consultation paper. London...
  • Health Education Authority. Health in England 1998. London: HMSO;...
  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50: a guideline developer's handbook. SIGN, Edinburgh;...
  • M. Hillsdon et al.

    Randomised controlled trials of physical activity promotion in free living populations: a review

    J Epidemiol Commun Health

    (1995)
  • M. Hillsdon et al.

    A systematic review of physical activity promotion strategies

    Br J Sports Med

    (1996)
  • C. Riddoch et al.

    Effectiveness of physical activity promotion schemes in primary care: a review

    (1998)
  • Munro J, Brazier J, Davey R, Cochrane T. A randomised controlled trial of the cost effectiveness of exercise in over-65...
  • H. Fielder et al.

    Lessons from a pilot study on prescribing exercise

    Health Educ J

    (1995)
  • Cited by (98)

    • Exercise Videogames, Physical Activity, and Health: Wii Heart Fitness: A Randomized Clinical Trial

      2019, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Equally important to achieving PA goals, it is necessary to establish whether individuals will voluntarily engage in EVGs with frequency and duration sufficient to produce changes in health and fitness.67 Population participation levels in PA are low, and among those who begin a program of PA, maintenance is also low, suggesting that PA has not proven to be an intrinsically motivating activity for the majority of the population.16,17,20,68,69 The present study demonstrated maintenance of PA in a real-world environment that also provided some accountability.

    • Referral for Expert Physical Activity Counseling: A Pragmatic RCT

      2017, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text