Radiographic-Based Grading Methods and Radiographic Measurement of Joint Space Width in Osteoarthritis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2009.04.004Get rights and content

Section snippets

Radioanatomic alignment of the tibiofemoral joint

The sine qua non for accurate measurement of radiographic JSW is a reproducible image of the joint space. A reproducible radiographic image of the tibiofemoral joint space requires adherence to exacting standards of positioning of the knee, which include specifications for flexion and rotation of the joint, and angulation of the x-ray beam.10 In a majority of patients, the anatomy of the knee is such that full extension of the joint (as is required for a conventional weight-bearing

Manual Methods

Before the development of the automated and semiautomated methods of the early 1990s, JSW measurement was conducted using purely manual methods in which the site of measurement within the compartment and the locations of the landmarks for measurement were judged purely by eye. Various methods have been employed to obtain measurements from a radiograph laid on a light box, including applying a ruler to the radiograph and reading the distance directly from the ruler; direct measurement from the

Implications for research and practice

A fair appraisal of alternative protocols for standardized knee radiography must take into account several practical limitations of fluoroscopically assisted techniques when they are exported for use in medical centers active in clinical research. Many established clinical research centers do not support the fluoroscopic equipment required for a weight-bearing knee examination. Even in the United States, where such equipment is available, a staffing shortage among radiology technologists makes

Summary

Osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis and one of the leading causes of disability in elders. With little currently available in the treatment of this disease, better understanding of responsive and valid endpoints is essential to identifying potential new interventions. Over the past 2 decades, numerous knee radiography protocols have been developed with various levels of complexity and performance as they relate to detecting change. Sensitivity to JSN is improved when

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (58)

  • A.C. Marijnissen et al.

    Knee Images Digital Analysis (KIDA): a novel method to quantify individual radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis in detail

    Osteoarthritis Cartilage

    (2008)
  • T. Conrozier et al.

    Measurement of the radiological hip joint space width. An evaluation of various methods of measurement

    Osteoarthritis Cartilage

    (2001)
  • J. Duryea et al.

    New radiographic-based surrogate outcome measures for osteoarthritis of the knee

    Osteoarthritis Cartilage

    (2003)
  • B. Wyman et al.

    Comparison of one year change in minimum joint space width to fixed location joint space measurements in Lyon Schuss X-rays from the A9001140 study

    Osteoarthritis Cartilage

    (2008)
  • T. Lacey et al.

    Comparison of x-ray and MRI in the determination of OA progression in the knee measured at a fixed-load-bearing position in the medical compartment

    Osteoarthritis Cartilage

    (2008)
  • J. Duryea et al.

    Study of location specific lateral compartment radiographic joint space width for knee osteoarthritis progression: analysis of longitudinal data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI)

    Osteoarthritis Cartilage

    (2008)
  • R. Altman et al.

    Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1986)
  • R. Altman et al.

    The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1991)
  • T.D. Spector et al.

    Definition of osteoarthritis of the knee for epidemiological studies

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (1993)
  • R. Altman et al.

    Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis

    Osteoarthritis Cartilage

    (1995)
  • W.W. Scott et al.

    Reliability of grading scales for individual radiographic features of osteoarthritis of the knee. The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging atlas of knee osteoarthritis

    Invest Radiol

    (1993)
  • J.H. Kellgren et al.

    Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (1957)
  • S.A. Mazzuca et al.

    Pitfalls in the accurate measurement of joint space narrowing in semiflexed, anteroposterior radiographic imaging of the knee

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2004)
  • D.J. Hunter et al.

    Change in joint space width: hyaline articular cartilage loss or alteration in meniscus?

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2006)
  • Brandt KD, Mazzuca SA, Conrozier T, et al. Which is the best radiologic/radiographic protocol for a clinical trial of a...
  • S.A. Mazzuca et al.

    Effect of alignment of the medial tibial plateau and x-ray beam on apparent progression of osteoarthritis in the standing anteroposterior knee radiograph

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2001)
  • J.C. Buckland-Wright et al.

    Accuracy and precision of joint space width measurements in standard and macroradiographs of osteoarthritic knees

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (1995)
  • S. Ahlback

    Osteoarthritis of the knee. A radiographic investigation

    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)

    (1968)
  • R.E. Leach et al.

    Weight bearing radiography in osteoarthritis of the knee

    Radiology

    (1970)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Characterization of the mid-coronal plane method for measurement of radiographic change in knee joint space width across different levels of image parallax

      2021, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
      Citation Excerpt :

      This provides an accurate and reliable determination of ΔJSW over time, as the reference line is relatively invariant to changes in image parallax. In contrast, techniques that are dependent on tibial margins may under- or over-estimate JSW when the locations of the anterior and posterior margins of the tibial plateau diverge due to image parallax9,27. In addition, for the TM methods, if the knee positioning relative to the X-ray beam changes between images, it is also possible that one JSW measurement may be made relative to the anterior tibial margin, while a measurement on a subsequent image is made relative to the posterior margin, thus introducing additional variability for ΔJSW measurements.

    • A novel quantitative metric for joint space width: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI)

      2020, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Joint space width (JSW), as measured in knee AP/PA radiographs1, is an indirect measure of cartilage width2 and currently the only recommended imaging biomarker by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a structural endpoint in clinical trials of knee OA3.

    • Claimed effects, outcome variables and methods of measurement for health claims proposed under Regulation (EC) 1924/2006 in the framework of bone health

      2018, PharmaNutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Changes in joint space width, leading to changes in joint structure, is one of the main features of osteoarthritis, whose pathological process include the breakdown of hyaline cartilage and damages in the surrounding joint tissue, i.e. the subchondral bone, the articular capsulae, synovium, meniscum and soft periarticular tissues. The joint space width is the most generally used and accepted outcome variable for the assessment of osteoarthritis severity, by the fact that both a reduction in cartilage thickness and the meniscal damage are clinically inferred from a reduction of joint space width [45]. In other words, it is worldwide assumed that loss of joint space width is a surrogate marker of cartilage damage in osteoarthritis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text