Improved model for solar cells with up-conversion of low-energy photons
Introduction
Techniques based on photon recycling [1], [2] and impact-ionization [3], [4], [5] have been proposed in the last 20 years to increase the efficiency of solar cells. More recently, two other processes were investigated. They were called ‘down-conversion’ and ‘down-shifting’, respectively, in Ref. [6]. In the first process, which is sometimes referred to as ‘quantum-cutting via down-conversion’ [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], more than one low-energy photons are produced from absorption of one high-energy photon. Consequently, the number of hot charge carriers generated by the high-energy photons decreases and the available energy lost by thermalization of carriers is diminished. In the second process, a ‘down-shifting’ layer is used to transform any high-energy photon for which the cell quantum efficiency (QE) is low to a lower energy photon for which the cell QE is high, thereby increasing the short-circuit current and the solar cell efficiency. This second process has been most discussed in the literature [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. A combination of down-shifting and down-conversion processes was studied in Ref. [18]. A more involved model for the down-conversion technique was proposed in Ref. [19] and used in Ref. [20].
An interesting technique has been proposed in Trupke et al. [21] to convert the incident low-energy (sub-band gap) solar photons into photons of energy higher than solar cell band gap. In this way the number of high-energy photons absorbed in the cell increases. Trupke et al. [21] have taken account that the radiation fluxes coming from a medium depends on the refractive index of that medium. However, the quoted authors did not include in their analysis all the effects that normally a different from unity refractive index has. Mainly, the fact that the radiation flux is changed when passing through interfaces of different refractive indexes was not considered. In this paper we propose a more involved model for the up-conversion technique, which takes into account the effects of the radiation transfer through interfaces. Also, Trupke et al. [21] considered only cells and up-converters of equal refractive index. Our analysis refers to cells and up-converters of different refractive indices. Finally, only the configuration solar cell- (rear) up-converter has bee considered in Ref. [21]. Here the configuration (front) up-converter - solar cell is analyzed, too.
We tried to keep the model as close as possible to the original model proposed in Ref. [21]. Therefore, it is free from the additional possible improvements (consideration of non-radiative recombination processes, anti-reflection layers, light trapping structures, etc). The main question we want answer is the following: adding an up-converter to the solar cell really improves the solar energy conversion efficiency?
Section snippets
Model of cell and up-converter system
The photon number flux density emitted by a semiconductor material with the refractive index n1 at temperature T1 is obtained by integration of the spectral photon number flux density:Here the relation between frequency ω and energy E is used. Also, El and Eu denote the lower and upper energy for the transition involved and μ1 is the chemical potential of the emitted radiation. The photon number flux density coming from a
Conclusions
Various methods to increase the solar cells efficiency were proposed in the last years. A system of converting the low-energy incident photons into photons of higher energy than the solar cell band gap was proposed in Ref. [21]. In this paper we re-analyzed the system proposed in Ref. [21] by using a more elaborated, but still rather idealized model. For reader convenience, the main idealization assumptions are shortly reminded now: (i) Solar and ambient radiation are treated as blackbody
Acknowledgments
This work is dedicated to Eugenia Badescu, mother and grand mother.
References (23)
Luminescent layers for enhanced silicon solar cell performance: down-conversion
Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells
(2006)- et al.
Photon management with lanthanides
Opt Mats
(2006) - et al.
Visible quantum cutting via downconversion in LiGdF4: Er3+, Tb3+ upon Er3+ 4f11→4f105d excitation
J Lumin
(2000) - et al.
Quantum cutting through downconversion in rare-earth compounds
J Lumin
(2000) - et al.
Down-conversion: a new route to visible quantum cutting
J Alloys Comp
(2000) - et al.
Enhancing solar cell efficiency by using spectral converters
Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells
(2005) - et al.
Silicon nanocrystals as light converter for solar cells
Thin Solid Films
(2004) - et al.
Theory of some effects of photon recycling in semiconductors
Semicond Sci Technol
(1993) - et al.
Influence of photon recycling on solar cell efficiency
Semicond Sci Technol
(1997) - et al.
Band–band impact ionisation and solar cell efficiency
J Appl Phys
(1993)