Clinical paperQuality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: A prospective interventional study☆
Introduction
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) defined as chest compressions and ventilations are important for survival after cardiac arrest,1 and quality of CPR influences outcome during basic life support.2, 3, 4
We have reported recently that quality of CPR during advanced life support (ALS) out-of-hospital did not adhere to the international guidelines,5, 6 when measured with new technology incorporated in standard defibrillators.7 Chest compressions were not given 48% of the time without spontaneous circulation, and only mean 28% (median 24%) of the chest compressions had a depth of 38–51 mm (guidelines recommendation).7
Others have reported similar findings with the same equipment in in-hospital arrests,8 and the results correspond with those found with other methods of quality measurements during out-of-hospital arrest in first responders and paramedics.9, 10, 11
Automated verbal feedback consistently has been reported to improve quality of CPR during manikin training,12, 13 with faster recovery of CPR skills when tested 6 and 12 months later.14, 15 Our recent publication on quality of CPR during ALS was a planned baseline-period before studying similar feedback via the defibrillator during CPR on patients. The hypothesis was that addition of such feedback would reactivate CPR skills and improve quality.
Section snippets
Methods
Except for the feedback system and statistical comparisons between the two groups without and with feedback, all details of the methods in this study have been reported in our recent publication,7 and a condensed version is therefore presented here.
Results
The annual statistics and demographic data for the three emergency medical service systems have been described previously.7 Two hundred and forty-three episodes were collected in the baseline period and 120 in the feedback period. Two patients during baseline and three with feedback did not receive CPR and were excluded leaving a total of 241 and 117, respectively. For quality of CPR analysis 65 additional patients were excluded from baseline (27%) and 9 (8%) from feedback. This was due to
Discussion
In this prospective, clinical trial chest compression depth and rate improved during a period with automatic verbal and visual feedback on CPR quality compared to the time period immediately before feedback was introduced. A limitation is that the study was sequential, not randomised. This was done on purpose to avoid possible spill-over effects to the control group of feedback-induced increased awareness of quality problems. This spill-over was anticipated to be a problem even if cluster
Conclusion
Quality of CPR improved with automated feedback. Changing feedback priority caused a parallel change in quality. Among all cases, increased chest compression depth was associated with increased short-term survival in a logistic regression model.
Conflict of interest statements
Authors Kramer-Johansen, Fellows, Svensson, and Sørebø have no conflicts of interest to declare. Myklebust is a full time employee on a fixed salary at Laerdal Medical, Stavanger.
Wik is on an advisory board for Medtronic Medical. Steen is a member of the board of directors for Laerdal Medical and The Norwegian Air Ambulance.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the participating paramedics and nurses for their enthusiasm, criticism and invaluable effort. We especially want to thank the local instructors: Jan Ottem, and Lars Didrik Flingtorp (Division of Prehospital Medicine, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway), Helena Borovszky, RN, and Lars Säfsten, RN (Stockholm Ambulance Service, Stockholm, Sweden) Andrew Nord and Allan Bromley (London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, London, UK). The helpfulness and technical skills of Ståle
References (33)
- et al.
Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a graphic model
Ann Emerg Med
(1993) - et al.
Quality and efficiency of bystander CPR
Resuscitation
(1993) - et al.
Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation influences outcome after prehospital cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(1994) - et al.
Quality assessment of defribrillation and advanced life support using data from the medical control module of the defibrillator
Resuscitation
(1999) - et al.
Interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the use of the automated external defibrillator in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Ann Emerg Med
(2003) - et al.
Improving CPR performance using an audible feedback system suitable for incorporation into an automated external defibrillator
Resuscitation
(2003) - et al.
An automated voice advisory manikin system for training in basic life support without an instructor. A novel approach to CPR training
Resuscitation
(2001) - et al.
Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement
Resuscitation
(2002) - et al.
Twelve-month retention of CPR skills with automatic correcting verbal feedback
Resuscitation
(2005) - et al.
Low chance of survival among patients requiring adrenaline (epinephrine) or intubation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Sweden
Resuscitation
(2002)
In-hospital factors associated with improved outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A comparison between four regions in Norway
Resuscitation
Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the ’Utstein style’: prepared by a Task Force of Representatives from the European Resuscitation Council, American Heart Association, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Australian Resuscitation Council
Resuscitation
Hawthorne effect—implications for prehospital research
Ann Emerg Med
Relationship of blood-pressure and flow during cpr to chest compression amplitude—evidence for an effective compression threshold
Ann Emerg Med
Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
JAMA
Cited by (437)
Monitoring chest compressions using finger photoplethysmography in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
2023, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
- ☆
A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.05.011.