A prospective study of Quality of life in schizophrenia in three European countries
Introduction
In recent years the assessment of quality of life (QoL) has become an important indicator in psychiatric research of the functioning and well-being of people with schizophrenia (Meltzer, 1999). Born of the era of deinstitutionalization, QoL assessment provides an opportunity to describe the well-being of people with chronic mental illness living in the community in terms of a broad range of different domains, instead of focussing only on the patients' medical needs. QoL is thus typically defined as “… the multidimensional evaluation, by both intrapersonal and social-normative criteria, of the person-environment system of an individual in time past, current and anticipated” (Lawton, 1991). In order to develop intervention strategies capable of improving people's QoL, the investigation of deficits in several QoL domains provides a first step. The necessary second step is to identify the factors hampering the achievement of people's needs in different domains.
A number of potential influences have been examined in relation to the QoL of psychiatric patients. The intuitive assumption that objective living conditions modulate subjective QoL has been tested in a number of studies (Atkinson et al., 1997, Bechdolf et al., 2003, Ruggeri et al., 2001, Ruggeri et al., 2002). However, these found only weak to moderate correlations between objective and subjective QoL. Both aspects of QoL seem to be interrelated in a complex way, possibly as a result of adaptation processes influencing the subjective evaluation of objective living conditions (Franz et al., 2001). We have thus included objective QoL measures like contact with family or friends, daily activities and financial situation in our study. A person's social, occupational and psychological functioning is another ‘objective’ variable that is known to be associated with subjective QoL (Becker et al., 2005, Gaite et al., 2002). It was likewise included.
Other important influences on subjective QoL are the various symptoms of schizophrenia. Some cross-sectional studies (Carpiniello et al., 1997, Kasckow et al., 2001) have found only weak associations between severity of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Using longitudinal designs, Karow et al. (2005) found no significant association of positive symptoms with QoL, while van de Willige et al. (2005) in contrast found that the reduction of positive symptoms was the most important factor in improving QoL. Lehman (1983) reported a negative relationship between QoL and depression. Depression was the main explanatory factor in a study by Reine et al. (2003), with 22% of the variance of subjective QoL. Other studies also consistently show depression to be a predictor of subjective QoL in schizophrenia patients (Bengtsson-Tops et al., 2005, Sim et al., 2004).
The relationship between educational level and subjective QoL is ambiguous. Higher educational level was associated with greater general well-being in studies by Vandiver (1998) and Carpiniello et al. (1997), while Skantze et al. (1992), Ruggeri et al. (2005) and Caron et al. (2005a) reported the opposite relationship. Most studies on patients with schizophrenia have shown higher QoL in females (Atkinson et al., 1997, Carpiniello et al., 1997, Koivumaa-Honkanen et al., 1996). Increasing age is associated with better subjective QoL, particularly in the domain of finances (Caron et al., 2005b, Kearns et al., 1987, Mercier et al., 1998). Caron et al. (2005a) found a positive relation between overall lifetime duration of hospitalisations and QoL.
So far, relatively few longitudinal studies have addressed QoL in schizophrenia patients, and most have only compared baseline data with a single follow up (Fitzgerald et al., 2003, Galletly et al., 1997, Priebe et al., 2000, Ritsner et al., 2006, Ruggeri et al., 2001). Exceptions are Huppert and Smith (2001) with five, and van de Willige et al. (2005) with three assessment waves. However, these included only small clinical samples. Our analyses are based on data from the European Schizophrenia Cohort Study (Bebbington et al., 2005), a two-year follow-up study set in nine centres in Britain, France and Germany. The cohort comprised 1208 patients at baseline who were interviewed on five occasions at 6-monthly intervals.
Using this large data set, the present study aims to examine the influence of the afore-mentioned factors on schizophrenia patients' subjective QoL simultaneously. We are particularly interested in investigating how subjective QoL may be affected by intra-personal changes of these variables over time, as this might provide a basis for interventions to improve QoL in schizophrenia patients.
Section snippets
Subjects
The EuroSC is a naturalistic two-year follow-up conducted in France (N = 288), Great Britain (N = 302) and Germany (N = 618). In each of these countries catchment areas were chosen that were socio-demographically distinct and had different styles of service delivery. Between them, they allowed a reasonable characterization of each country, although samples were not formally representative of patients in the respective countries. A description of the study's rationales and methods is presented by
Sociodemographics
Socio-demographics characteristics and some schizophrenia symptoms at baseline are shown in Table 3. The mean ages in the three countries differed significantly but by less than 2 years, ranging from 39.6 years in France to 41.5 years in Germany. The German sample comprised significantly fewer males (56.8%) and single people (54.2%). The proportion of employed people was significantly higher in Germany than in the other two countries (Marwaha et al., in press). There were no differences in the
Discussion
Subjective QoL in schizophrenia patients is related to objective QoL, illness symptoms, socio-demographic characteristics and country of residence. The factors that contribute to the eight domains of subjective QoL differ, but objective financial situation, and depressive and positive symptoms had a general effect on most of the domains. QoL is more strongly related to time-invariant differences between individuals than to intra-personal changes over time.
References (48)
- et al.
A depression rating scale for schizophrenics
Schizophr. Res.
(1990) - et al.
A psychometric comparison of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Schizophr. Res.
(1996) - et al.
Socio-demographic and clinical predictors of quality of life in patients with schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder
Psychiatry Res.
(2005) - et al.
Sociocultural and economic aspects of quality of life measurement
Eur. Psychiatr.
(1997) - et al.
A longitudinal study of patient- and observer-rated quality of life in schizophrenia
Psychiatry Res.
(2003) - et al.
Responsiveness of subjective quality of life assessment in schizophrenic patients: a quasi-experimental pilot study
Eur. Psychiatr.
(2001) - et al.
Relationships between changes in symptom ratings, neurophysiological test performance and quality of life in schizophrenic patients treated with clozapine
Psychiatry Res.
(1997) - et al.
Health-related quality of well-being in chronically hospitalized patients with schizophrenia: comparison with matched outpatients
Psychiatry Res.
(2001) - et al.
Reliability and validity of the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenics
Psychiatry Res.
(1988) A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders