ReviewPhysiological cellular reprogramming and cancer
Introduction
The specification of cellular fate during development and differentiation is a dynamic and evolving process that starts with stem and progenitor cells and ends with terminal differentiation into a given specialized cellular type. Along this way there can be many cellular intermediates, some of them long-lived, and some very transient. In all cases, the maintenance of cellular identity is determined to a certain degree by the signals from the environment and, more importantly, in an intrinsic manner, by specific transcription factors that, together with epigenetic chromatin modifications, establish a defined gene expression profile and specific gene regulatory networks (GRNs).
Although many evidences about cellular plasticity had being accumulating for decades [1], [2], [3], [4], the latest findings in the field of reprogramming are finally shaking our beliefs about the stability of cellular identity and showing how switching to a different phenotype can be a lot easier than previously expected, and can have actual physiological relevance outside of the laboratory. Cancer is a clear case of pathological reprogramming where, from a normal tissue, a whole new differentiation branch is opened with its own hierarchy and structure [5], [6]. So, beyond aberrant deregulation of proliferation, tumoral reprogramming is an essential part of the tumorigenesis process, and it is closely dependent on the cellular plasticity of the cancer-initiating cells. Here we define cellular plasticity as the ability of cells (stem or differentiated) to adopt the biological properties (gene expression profile, phenotype, etc.) of other differentiated types of cells (belonging to the same or different lineages). This broad acception includes the property of competence, defined as the ability of stem cells and progenitors to give rise to their different descendant lineages during normal development. With this wide definition we intend to reflect the fact that the mechanisms that are important for stem cell competence during normal development are also at the basis of the plasticity of more differentiated types of cells, both in pathological processes and in experimentally induced fate-changing processes. In this article we will discuss the essential role of cellular plasticity in the origin and maintenance of cancerous cells. To this aim, we will first comment on the latest findings about normal developmental and experimentally induced plasticity, to consider afterwards how these properties connect with what we know about cancer biology.
Section snippets
Stem cell identity and lineage choice
Adult stem cells are in charge of replenishing the different types of specialized cells that compose the organism. Most of them fulfil this task during the entire life of the organism, thanks to their self-renewal capacity that allows them to divide asymmetrically originating a new identical multipotent stem cell and a multipotential progenitor that will give rise to all the variety of differentiated tissue cells. It is clear that there is a number of transcription factors that play a crucial
Cellular identity of differentiation intermediates
In some rare cases, adult stem cells are unipotent, and can only give rise to one type of differentiated cells (for example, spermatogonial stem cells, Fig. 1A). However, in most cases there are several types of specialized cells that can arise from a given stem cell type. So, once stem cells lose their self-renewal potential and enter the differentiation process by becoming multipotential progenitors, there are still many possibilities for them to follow. We have mentioned before that part of
Identity and plasticity of terminally differentiated cells
In general, the final cellular identity of any given differentiation pathway is stable and usually corresponds to a highly specialized cellular type with a particular physiological function. This actually seems logical since, from the point of view of physiology, it would not make sense that, under normal conditions, a specialized cell would have to be reprogrammed to give rise to a different cell type. So, in principle, plasticity, from the point of view of normal development, is a property
Transcriptional control of reprogramming in oncogenesis and induced pluripotency
Research in cancer has been a seminal source of knowledge and hypothesis for the fields of stem cell biology and developmental biology, including the fact that it was the study of teratocarcinomas what finally led to the identification of embryonic stem (ES) cells in blastocysts [31], [32], [33]. In the same way, there are several features of our current paradigm for understanding cancer development that have influenced or developed in parallel with the study of the reprogramming problem, and
Future prospects
The potential applications of pluripotent reprogramming to regenerative medicine are immense and tremendously varied. However, as we have highlighted in this review, the knowledge obtained in the research of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of reprogramming will also have deep implications for our understanding and treatment of cancer. Indeed, the two fields of research will continue to be closely intertwined and mutually dependent. As a way of an example, the main potential complication
Conflicts of interest
F.A.J. and R.J. have no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. C.C. was a scientific founder and owns a small percentage of stock of OncoStem Pharma, a small biotech company with interest in the cancer stem cell field.
Acknowledgments
We thank all members of labs 13 at IBMCC and B-15 at the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology for their helpful comments and constructive discussions. Research in the group is supported partially by FEDER (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias PI080164), Proyectos Intramurales Especiales (CSIC), Fundación Mutua Madrileña and Junta de Castilla y León (SA060A09 and Proyecto Biomedicina 2009–2010). F.A.J. is the recipient of an FPU fellowship from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.
References (107)
- et al.
Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells
Cell
(2005) - et al.
Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states
Cell Stem Cell
(2008) - et al.
Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction
Cell Stem Cell
(2009) - et al.
Genetic regulatory networks programming hematopoietic stem cells and erythroid lineage specification
Dev Biol
(2006) - et al.
The sequential determination model of hematopoiesis
Trends Immunol
(2007) - et al.
Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors
Cell
(2006) - et al.
Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts
Cell
(1987) - et al.
Stepwise reprogramming of B cells into macrophages
Cell
(2004) - et al.
Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse
Cell Stem Cell
(2008) - et al.
The hallmarks of cancer
Cell
(2000)