‘Rules’ for boys, ‘guidelines’ for girls: Gender differences in symptom reporting during childhood and adolescence☆
Introduction
The emergence of higher reported morbidity in females compared with males is increasingly recognised as a feature of adolescent health in “a large proportion of the world's industrialised countries” (Torsheim et al., 2006, p. 823). For example, when completing self-report symptom checklists at age 11, 56% of boys and 66% of girls reported having “stomach ache or sickness” in the past month in a longitudinal study of Scottish schoolchildren (n = 2063). However, at age 15 the prevalence was substantially higher in girls (78%) but little changed in boys (52%). Similarly, whilst comparable proportions (33% for males; 37% for females) reported “feeling sad, unhappy or low” in the past month at age 11, many more girls (56%) than boys (32%) reported this symptom at 15 years (Sweeting & West, 2003). Evidence from 29 European and North American countries (n = 125,732) demonstrates a similar pattern: the reporting of at least one symptom from a list of eight common health complaints was very similar for boys at age 11 (47%) and 15 (46%), whereas in girls it was higher at age 15 (63%) than at 11 (53%) (Torsheim et al., 2006). These figures demonstrate not only emerging female excess morbidity, but also the generally high rates of symptom reporting in adolescence (West, 2009), at least in the context of self-complete questionnaire surveys.
Although gender differences in adult health have been widely reported and discussed (Annandale, 2009, Barsky et al., 2001, Gijsbers van Wijk and Kolk, 1997, Gove and Hughes, 1979, Macintyre et al., 1996, Verbrugge and Wingard, 1987), comparatively little research has focused on the gender patterning of ill-health during childhood and adolescence (Sweeting, 1995, Sweeting et al., 2007). As at all ages (Bird & Rieker, 2008), it is likely that both biological factors and social influences underlie observed patterns, but societal gender- and age-related expectations of illness behaviours may be particularly important at this age (Angold et al., 1999, Barsky et al., 2001, Prout, 1989, Simpson, 2000, Sweeting and West, 2003, Sweeting et al., 2007, Williams, 2000). A better understanding of the emergence of higher symptom reporting by females during adolescence may help explain gender differences in adult health (Hetland et al., 2002, Sweeting, 1995).
Throughout their childhood, children are exposed to societal expectations for gender- and age-appropriate illness behaviours. In respect of gender, these processes may be at work from infancy (Hoffman & Hurst, 1990). Sociological understandings of gender have placed increasing emphasis on performative gender, i.e. on gender as something which consciously or unconsciously is ‘achieved’, demonstrated or, indeed, parodied in social interactions (Butler, 1990, Goffman, 1977, West and Zimmerman, 1987) throughout the lifecourse. In line with this, children and young people are commonly conceptualised as active agents in the construction of their gender identities (Connell, 2000, Frosh et al., 2002, Morrow, 2006, Thorne, 1993). The ability to report feelings about the self may be a function of culturally prescribed stereotypes of gender, with males' tendency to be less expressive in disclosing feelings (Gijsbers van Wijk & Kolk, 1997) reflecting a need to conform to hegemonic stereotypes of masculinity (Connell, 2000, Courtenay, 2000), whereas similarly dominant stereotypes of femininity may encourage girls to partake in ‘girl talk’, whereby they share their feelings and concerns with other females (Polce-Lynch, Myers, Kilmartin, Forsmann-Falck, & Kliewer, 1998). Studies have suggested that adolescent boys perceive ill-health as something which can threaten their masculinity and which should thus be hidden, particularly in the public, peer-based context of school (Prout, 1989, Williams, 1999, Williams, 2000, Williams, 2002).
Research, albeit from a different, more psychological theoretical tradition, also generally concludes that socialisation processes work to mould the illness behaviours of children towards the self-discipline displayed by most adults, with reductions in both emotional displays and help-seeking (Fearon et al., 1996, Fuchs and Thelen, 1988, Mechanic, 1964, Prout, 1986). With age, children's understandings of the causes of ill-health increase and they also become more aware of age- and gender-appropriate illness behaviours. In addition, their ideas about gender become more sophisticated, and understandings begin to incorporate flexibility and allow for similarities between, as well as differences within, the categories of male and female (Martin and Ruble, 2004, Montgomery, 2005). Although gender identities are constructed from an early age, it has been suggested that adolescence may be a particularly important time for their development because of the occurrence of the physical and physiological changes of puberty at the same time as boys and girls become increasingly distinguished by differing social expectations (Burke & Weir, 1978) and their lives dominated by their peer environments and focussed around issues of status, identity and conformity (Brown et al., 1986, Giordano, 2003).
Boys' peer groups have been described as competitive and unsupportive environments (Adler and Adler, 1998, Gilbert and Gilbert, 1998, Harris, 1998, Leaper, 1994). Membership is seen as a social ‘must’, with entry into a popular group often relying on evidence of typically ‘masculine’ attributes, such as ‘hardness’ and sporting prowess, which serve to boost boys' constructions of themselves as occupying higher positions in masculine hierarchies (Askew and Ross, 1988, Frosh et al., 2002). Projection of the body as physically superior and athletic is viewed as a crucial resource for successful performances of masculinity. Admissions of pain or displays of weakness, such as crying or losing a fight, are seen as reflecting inadequate or failed masculinities (Connell, 2000, Swain, 2003, Swain, 2004). Boys' ritualised forms of humour are important in regulating masculinities and constructing hierarchies, confirming the high position of the story-tellers or name-callers, whilst policing and punishing any boys who stray too far from dominant masculine ideals (Kehily and Nayak, 1997, Mac an Ghaill, 1994).
Studies of girls' peer groups depict them as more likely to invest time in talking and emotional work, with friendships characterised by physical closeness, ‘having a laugh’ and reciprocal loyalty and support (Frosh et al., 2002, Griffiths, 1995, Hey, 1997, Rose, 2002). Nevertheless, girls' groups also have ‘rules’ and power relationships which serve to include some while excluding others, depending on the performance of “appropriate forms of femininity” (Hey, 1997, p. 130). However, the literature suggests less clarity in the behaviours deemed (in)appropriate for adolescent girls and contradictions and ambiguities between a more traditional passive, regulated ‘femininity’ versus a restless ‘adolescence’ and girls' increasing physiological sexualisation. To some degree these reflect changes in girls' expectations following secular changes in the social and economic positions of women in recent decades (Duncan, 1999, Frosh et al., 2002, Griffiths, 1995, Holstein-Beck, 1995, Hudson, 1984, Mac an Ghaill, 1994, McRobbie, 2000). It has been argued that these have resulted in a divide between how young women “feel they ought to identify themselves and how they actually identify themselves” (Bjerrum Nielsen, 2004, p. 21).
Taken together, this literature suggests that, with age, boys will become less likely than girls to report symptoms of illness because of the detrimental impact this may have on their own and others' perception of their masculinity. In contrast, dominant stereotypes of femininity would suggest that it is generally easier for girls to report and seek help for illness. This paper presents qualitative data generated within focus group discussions with 10-, 13- and 15-year old males and females. The main aim of the paper is to explore whether symptom reporting is influenced by perceived societal gender and age-related expectations and the social context of symptom experiences. A secondary aim is to assess whether these factors help to explain quantitative evidence of age-related increases in gender differences in symptom reporting.
Section snippets
Participants and procedures
Following pilot focus groups conducted within inner city schools, participants were recruited from one secondary and one (associated) primary school in a town within a predominantly rural area (MacLean, 2006). Both schools have a large, mixed catchment, including pupils from both working class and farming backgrounds as well as more middle class homes. The secondary school is the only state secondary in the area, serving the whole community, although there are also two private (fee-paying)
Results
We present the findings in three sections: expectations of boys and girls; dealing with a ‘physical’ symptom; and dealing with a ‘psychological’ symptom. The latter two sections highlight participants' accounts of gender and age similarities and differences. These differences included both those described by all or most participants (boys and girls, older and younger) and those evident in analysis of data from boys compared with girls or from older compared with younger participants. All names
Discussion
Performances of gender (and, to a lesser extent, age-appropriate behaviours) were key aspects of the 10, 13 and 15-year old participants’ self-presentations within these single-sex focus group discussions about common symptoms of ill-health. In line with previous research (Johansson et al., 2007, Prout, 1986, Swain, 2003, Swain, 2004, Williams, 1999, Williams, 2000), all participants demonstrated a keen awareness that societal expectations dictate that boys should react to illness with displays
References (78)
- et al.
The importance of peer group (“crowd”) affiliation in adolescence
Journal of Adolescence
(1986) Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health
Social Science & Medicine
(2000)- et al.
‘Booboos’: the study of everyday pain among young children
Pain
(1996) - et al.
The focus group method: insights from focus group interviews on sexual health with adolescents
Social Science & Medicine
(2005) - et al.
Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem?
Social Science & Medicine
(1996) Reversals of fortune? Sex differences in health in childhood and adolescence
Social Science & Medicine
(1995)- et al.
Sex differences in health at ages 11, 13 and 15
Social Science & Medicine
(2003) - et al.
Cross-national variation of gender differences in adolescent subjective health in Europe and North America
Social Science & Medicine
(2006) The status and validity of accounts obtained at interview: a contrast between two studies of families with a disabled child
Social Science & Medicine
(1990)Doing health, doing gender: teenagers, diabetes and asthma
Social Science & Medicine
(2000)
Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity
Pubertal changes in hormone levels and depression in girls
Psychological Medicine
Women's health and social change
Boys don't cry: Boys and sexism in education
Somatic symptom reporting in women and men
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Gender and health. The effects of constrained choices and social policies
Noisy girls: new subjectivities and old gender discourses
Young Nordic Journal of Youth Research
Sex differences in adolescent life stress, social support, and well-being
Journal of Psychology
Gender trouble
Research with children. Perspectives and practices
The men and the boys
Hard-earned lives: Accounts of health and illness from East London
Sexual bullying
Schooling sexualities
The vignette technique in survey research
Sociology
Young masculinities
Children's expected interpersonal consequences of communicating their affective state and reported likelihood of expression
Child Development
Sex differences in physical symptoms: the contribution of symptom perception theory
Social Science & Medicine
Masculinity goes to school
Relationships in adolescence
Annual Review of Sociology
Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity
The arrangement between the sexes
Theory and Society
Possible causes of the apparent sex differences in physical health: an empirical investigation
American Sociological Review
Adolescent girls and their friends
The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do
Subjective health complaints in adolescence: dimensional structure and variation across age and gender
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
The company she keeps
Gender stereotypes: perception and rationalization?
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Consistency and change in the lifeworld of young women
Cited by (66)
Sex differences in the trajectories to diagnosis of patients presenting with common somatic symptoms in primary care: an observational cohort study
2021, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :The heightened bodily vigilance of women and their familiarization with primary care is thought to lower the threshold of seeking care for somatic symptoms [37,38]. In contrast, masculine gender stereotypes, for example stoicism about symptom reporting [28,39], may delay male healthcare-seeking behaviour. Due to the relatively early female healthcare-seeking behaviour, women present with less typical symptoms of disease and consequently receive fewer specialist referrals and diagnoses.
Secular trends in adolescents' diagnosed health status and healthcare consultation: examinations of Canadian national surveys from 2007 to 2016
2020, Public HealthCitation Excerpt :Three lines of interpretations are possible for the findings. First, the gender-related expectations of symptom reporting and seeking health care are more relaxed for girls than for boys,51 and they are also applied unequally to physical and mental health domains. As a result, health experience can vary by gender, as girls perceive lesser stigmatization, based on the awareness of the need for taking action to ameliorate the condition in question.52
Is the effect of ill health on school achievement among Swedish adolescents gendered?
2019, SSM - Population HealthCitation Excerpt :While the severity of reported psychosomatic symptoms has increased over time in Sweden, this increase cannot be explained solely by changes in perceived school demands (Nygren & Hagquist, 2017). Other proposed explanations for girls’ high levels of self-rated ill health suggest that perceived societal expectations of femininity and masculinity may increase willingness to report symptoms among girls while reducing it among boys, and that this effect may be especially pronounced for psychological symptoms (see e.g. Danielsson & Johansson, 2009; Maclean, Sweeting, & Hunt, 2010). Another plausible explanation that is consistent with the notion of gender socialization suggests potential gender bias in the measures of self-rated health.
Female sex and femininity independently associate with common somatic symptom trajectories
2022, Psychological MedicineDiscordance between Adolescents and Parents in Functional Somatic Symptom Reports: Sex Differences and Future Symptom Prevalence
2023, Journal of Youth and Adolescence
- ☆
The author acknowledges the Medical Research Council for funding the study on which this paper is based and thanks Carol Emslie for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript.