Review ArticleCausal assessment of occupational bending or twisting and low back pain: results of a systematic review
Introduction
Low back pain (LBP) is a musculoskeletal disorder involving an interaction between anatomical, psychological, socioeconomic, and occupational risk factors that may culminate in varying degrees of pain and disability. The lifetime prevalence of LBP has been estimated at 84% [1] of the general population. In the working-age population, LBP has the highest health care use among all chronic diseases, resulting in a heavy economic burden [2], [3]. Given its prevalence and consequences, LBP is a major occupational health concern. To effectuate meaningful changes in work-related LBP, it is necessary to improve our understanding of the etiology of LBP as it relates to common specific occupational physical activities.
Bending and twisting are routine physical activities performed in many different occupations, and both have been examined in various settings to determine whether they may cause LBP. Previous studies have suggested that bending or twisting is associated with increased intradiscal pressure that predisposes discs to injury (eg, degeneration or herniation) [4], [5], [6]. Despite uncertainty as to whether these activities are in fact injurious, modified duty return-to-work plans for workers with LBP often aim to reduce the performance of difficult tasks such as twisting and bending to prevent reinjury [7]. A more thorough comprehension of the causal association between bending or twisting and LBP may be beneficial to 1) establish occupational guidelines for the primary prevention of LBP, 2) identify potential work modifications for the secondary prevention of LBP, and 3) provide guidance to stakeholders involved in the adjudication process of occupational LBP claims.
Establishing causal links between specific risk factors and LBP from single studies has historically proven complex and unreliable because of the limitations imposed by specific research questions, study designs, study populations, study methodological quality, and specific types of statistical analyses. A systematic review, however, can help establish causation between isolated risk factors and LBP by summarizing all available evidence in light of the many criteria that have been proposed to determine causation [8], [9]. It can also critically appraise the methodological quality of the studies to establish the degree to which their results are subject to bias or confounding [10], [11]. To date, no systematic review has been conducted on the causality of occupational bending or twisting and LBP.
The purpose of this study was to identify, evaluate, and summarize the best available evidence regarding bending or twisting and LBP in workers, using Bradford-Hill [12] criteria for causation.
Section snippets
Methods
A systematic review was performed to identify, evaluate, and summarize the literature related to establishing a causal relationship, according to Bradford-Hill criteria, between occupational bending or twisting and LBP.
Results
Overall, the electronic and manual search strategies yielded a total of 2,766 citations, of which 275 were deemed potentially relevant. Upon review of the full-text copies of the 275 articles, 35 satisfied all of the specific study inclusion/exclusion criteria. Figure summarizes the results of the searching, Level 1 and 2 screening, data abstraction, quality appraisal, and summary evaluation of evidence for causation. A total of 23 studies were considered of low methodological quality, and 12
Discussion
Bending and/or twisting are common activities in many workplaces. Previous studies [21], [24] have indicated that performing certain bending exercises can contribute toward LBP. Twisting has been classified by Videman et al. [14] and van den Heuvel et al. [20] as a hazardous activity, which can place undue stress on the spine that may eventually culminate in LBP. The results of this study indicate that there was conflicting evidence available to support a causal relationship between bending and
Conclusions
The present study was unable to uncover evidence supporting more than three of the Bradford-Hill criteria for causation for occupational bending or twisting and LBP. Based on the results of this review, it is unlikely that occupational bending or twisting is independently causative of LBP in workers. The strength of association was often rated as weak or moderate, and none demonstrated a statistically significant dose response. This suggests that if a causal relationship exists, it may be weak.
References (55)
- et al.
The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults
Spine
(1998) The economic burden of musculoskeletal disorders in Canada is similar to that for cancer, and may be higher
J Rheumatol
(1995)- et al.
The economic cost of musculoskeletal disorders in Canada
Arthritis Care Res
(1998) Disc pressure measurements
Spine
(1981)- et al.
In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems
Spine
(1999) - et al.
Identifying risk factors for low back pain (LBP) in Chinese middle-aged women: a case-control study
Health Care Women Int
(2004) - et al.
Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: an international comparison
Occup Environ Med
(2003) - et al.
A guide to interpreting epidemiologic studies on the etiology of back pain
Spine
(1994) Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related
Int J Epidemiol
(2000)- et al.
Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM
(2000)
The environment and disease: association or causation?
Proc R Soc Med
Acute low back problems in adults
Low back pain among nurses: a follow-up beginning at entry to the nursing school
Spine
Dose-response relations between occupational exposures to physical and psychosocial factors and the risk of low back pain
Occup Environ Med
Individual factors, occupational loading, and physical exercise as predictors of sciatic pain
Spine
New low back pain in nurses: work activities, work stress and sedentary lifestyle
J Adv Nurs
Workplace factors and care seeking for low-back pain among female nursing personnel. MUSIC-Norrtalje Study Group
Scand J Work Environ Health
Work related risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints in the nursing profession: results of a questionnaire survey
Occup Environ Med
Prognostic factors related to recurrent low-back pain and sickness absence
Scand J Work Environ Health
Is an imbalance between physical capacity and exposure to work-related physical factors associated with low-back, neck or shoulder pain?
Scand J Work Environ Health
Risk factors for new-onset low back pain amongst cohorts of newly employed workers
Rheumatology (Oxford)
High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study
Occup Environ Med
Risk factors for sick leave due to low back pain: a prospective study
J Occup Environ Med
Lower back problems and occupational risk factors in a South African steel industry
Am J Ind Med
Biomechanics of back pain
Acupunct Med
Spondylolysis. Bending of the inferior articular processes of lumbar vertebrae during simulated spinal movements
Spine
Cited by (128)
Unhelpful beliefs and attitudes about low back pain in the general population: A cross-sectional survey
2021, Musculoskeletal Science and PracticeA preliminary assessment of physical work exposures among electronic waste workers at Agbogbloshie, Accra Ghana
2021, International Journal of Industrial ErgonomicsReliability of a battery of tests for functional evaluation of trunk exoskeletons
2020, Applied ErgonomicsChallenges of Measuring Self-Reported Exposure to Occupational Biomechanical Risk Factors Amongst People with Low Literacy Engaged in Manual Labour: Findings from a Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Investigation in an African Population with Chronic Low Back Pain
2024, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
FDA device/drug status: not applicable.
Author disclosures: BKK (consulting, Medtronic); SD (consulting, Palladian Health; Scientific Advisory Board, Palladian Health).
This study was funded by a peer-review grant provided to Drs Wai, Bishop, Kwon, and Dagenais by the Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia.