Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: An Attractive Option

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2005.04.004Get rights and content

Section snippets

History of gastric banding

The development of purely restrictive weight-loss operations evolved in an attempt to avoid the perioperative and long-term morbidity of the jejuno-ileal bypass and the early experience with gastric bypass. Initial attempts at gastric partitioning to create a gastric pouch, leading to a sensation of fullness with ingestion of small portions of food, were unsuccessful because of early weight regain. The introduction of the vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) by Mason [6] in 1982 demonstrated that

Surgical technique of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement

The technique of LAGB placement has evolved from the initial descriptions by Belachew and colleagues [11] and Favretti and colleagues [12] as the result of attempts to minimize many of the late complications initially associated with the LAGB. The perigastric technique, as initially described, involved creating a window along the lesser curvature of the stomach 3 cm below the gastroesophageal junction (Fig. 1). This dissection was performed along the gastric wall medial to the neurovascular

Postoperative management of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band

Although proper surgical technique is essential to minimize late complications of the LAGB, weight loss depends on postoperative follow-up and appropriate band adjustments. Frequent adjustments often are necessary to maintain the proper degree of restriction. An inappropriately adjusted band leads to ineffective weight loss. As with the evolution of the technique of LAGB placement and the reduction in late complications, substantial changes in postoperative band management have contributed to

Results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding—perioperative complications

A major advantage of the LAGB is its safety. An evidence-based review by the Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical found that LAGB was associated with a median overall morbidity rate of 11.3% with a mean short-term mortality of 0.05%, compared with a 23.6% morbidity and 0.5% mortality for RYGB [10]. Major perioperative complications are infrequent with LAGB. O'Brien and colleagues [13], in a series of 1065 patients including their initial experience

Results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding—late complications

The evolution of the technique of LAGB placement from the perigastric to the pars flaccida technique has greatly reduced the incidence of gastric prolapse, pouch dilatation, and erosion. Weiner and colleagues [24] reported a prolapse rate of 5.3% with the perigastric technique (17% in the first 100 patients), which was reduced to 0.2% with the pars flaccida technique. The incidence of erosion was 0.3%. Minor port-related complications occurred in 2.5%. No band extirpations were required in the

Weight loss following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

Weight loss after LAGB clearly depends on proper band adjustments and a frequent adjustment schedule during the first 1 to 2 years postoperatively. The need for frequent adjustments results from the loss of perigastric fat within the band with weight loss, loosening the band and permitting increased intake. Weight loss after LAGB is significantly slower than after RYGB, so comparisons between the operations demonstrate superior weight loss with RYGB when only early results are reported.

The massively obese

The ability to place a band laparoscopically in the massively superobese offers significant advantages in terms of perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with conventional open surgery. Although laparoscopic RYGB has been reported in the superobese, it is technically much more demanding. The increased risk of major perioperative complications with gastric bypass in patients in whom diagnostic imaging often is not possible complicates management. Although it has been suggested that LAGB

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the obese (body mass index 30–35)

The current guidelines for weight loss surgery (BMI ≥40 or ≥35 with comorbidities) were established by the National Institutes of Health consensus panel based on available evidence regarding the risks and benefits of surgery for obesity weighed against the risks of morbid obesity [16]. Since 1991, substantial knowledge has been gained regarding the health risks of morbid obesity. In addition, improvements in the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery have been demonstrated. As a result, it

Resolution of comorbidities with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

Weight loss is a benefit of bariatric surgery, but improvements in comorbid illness and quality of life are the primary goals. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major contributor to the long-term morbidity associated with morbid obesity. Dolan and colleagues [53] reported that 65% of 49 diabetics with at least 6 months follow-up no longer required any diabetes medications after LAGB. Dixon and O'Brien [54] demonstrated normalization of glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and insulin resistance in 64% of type

Summary

More than 8 million persons in the United States have a BMI of 40 or higher, and an additional 23 million persons have a BMI between 35 and 40. Many of these persons have significant obesity-related comorbidities. Bariatric surgery remains the only effective treatment for morbid obesity. Despite the exponential increase in the number of weight-loss operations being performed, it is evident that, with 100,000 to 200,000 procedures performed annually, most patients suffering the complications of

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (57)

  • G. Szinicz et al.

    A new method in the surgical treatment of disease

    Acta Chir Aust

    (1982)
  • M. Belachew et al.

    Laparoscopic adjustable silicon banding in the treatment of morbid obesity: a preliminary report

    Surg Endosc

    (1994)
  • M. Belachew et al.

    Laparoscopic placement of adjustable silicone gastric band in the treatment of morbid obesity: how to do it

    Obes Surg

    (1995)
  • F. Favretti et al.

    Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding: technique and results

    Obes Surg

    (1995)
  • P.E. O'Brien et al.

    Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity

    Arch Surg

    (2003)
  • E.J. DeMaria et al.

    A critical look at laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: does it measure up?

    Surg Endosc

    (2000)
  • M. Belachew et al.

    Evolution of a paradigm for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

    Am J Surg

    (2002)
  • Consensus Development Conference Panel

    Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity

    Ann Intern Med

    (1991)
  • C.J. Ren et al.

    Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: surgical technique

    J Laparoenosc Adv Surg Tech A

    (2003)
  • F. Favretti et al.

    Patient management after Lap-Band placement

    Am J Surg

    (2002)
  • E.J. DeMaria et al.

    High failure rate after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for treatment of morbid obesity

    Ann Surg

    (2001)
  • E. Niville et al.

    Late pouch dilation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: incidence, treatment, and outcome

    Obes Surg

    (1999)
  • G.B. Cadiere et al.

    Laparoscopic gastroplasty (adjustable silicone gastric banding)

    Semin Laparosc Surg

    (2000)
  • R. Shen et al.

    Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery

    Obes Surg

    (2004)
  • J.-M. Chevallier et al.

    Complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: experience with 1,000 patients over 7 years

    Obes Surg

    (2004)
  • R. Weiner et al.

    Outcome after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding—8 years experience

    Obes Surg

    (2003)
  • G.A. Fielding et al.

    Laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: surgical outcome in 335 cases

    Surg Endosc

    (1999)
  • H. Spivak et al.

    The Lap-Band system in the United States: one surgeon's experience with 271 patients

    Surg Endosc

    (2004)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Gastric band erosion: Alternative management

      2015, Cirugia y Cirujanos (English Edition)
    • Evolution of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

      2011, Surgical Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      These staple lines, however, eventually became disrupted, causing significant weight regain over time, or the bands eroded, causing obstruction. Open gastric banding tried to eliminate the use of staples by placing polyester or polypropylene mesh around the proximal stomach to create restriction.23 This attempt also failed, due to erosion and gastric outlet obstruction.

    • Laparoscopic single-site surgery for placement of adjustable gastric band-a series of 22 cases

      2010, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although laparoscopic gastric bypass remains the most commonly practiced procedure in the United States, LAGB is now a well accepted alternative for the treatment of morbid obesity. Several series have demonstrated its safety and efficacy in achieving significant weight loss since its introduction in 2001 [3–5,7,11–20]. LAGB has also been shown to be effective in the resolution of co-morbidities such as type 2 diabetes.

    • Surgical implantation and adjustment technique with the Realize Band System

      2009, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      The band is left unfilled for 4 weeks after surgery to promote healing and to avert tightness of the stoma, perioperative edema, and emesis. Although a consensus has note been reached regarding guidelines for follow-up [47], good outcomes are associated with patient compliance and periodic adjustments [48]. Approximately 5–6 adjustments are performed in the first year, tapering to 2 or 3 annually in the next 2 years.

    • The history and role of gastric banding

      2008, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fielding and Ren [33] report that approximately 5 or 6 adjustments are generally appropriate in the first year, with 2 or 3 adjustments commonly needed in the following year. Provost [39], however, has noted the absence of agreement on, and official guidelines for, band adjustments; this is an area for future study and refinement. Just as surgical and follow-up procedures have improved, so have the bands themselves.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The author has performed consultant work for INAMED Health and United States Surgical Corporation and received educational support from United States Surgical.

    View full text