Differential gene expression profiling of mouse skin after sulfur mustard exposure: Extended time response and inhibitor effect
Introduction
Sulfur mustard [bis(2-chloroethyl)sulfide] (sulfur mustard, SM, HD) is a potent alkylating agent which penetrates the skin rapidly causing skin blistering within hours (Fig. 1A). The fluid filled blisters occur at the level of the dermal–epidermal junction (DEJ) which is also the identical pathological target for Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa (JEB) (Monteiro-Riviere et al., 1999) JEB is a genetic skin blistering disease where the epidermis separates away from the dermis and compromises the skin integrity. Disruption of the dermal–epidermal junction in JEB appears to be further magnified through the actions of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a family of proteases that both enhances the action of many activating factors during the inflammatory response, and contributes to tissue degradation (Yancey, 2005). Currently, there is no established pharmacological countermeasure against SM-induced skin injury. Because the precise mechanisms responsible for SM-induced skin injury are unknown, treatment strategies and pharmacological countermeasures continue to be developed. Our previous work identified matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as a potential target of therapy for SM damage in that it quantitatively increases over time in response to sulfur mustard exposure (Shakarjian et al., 2006). Since this increase in MMP-9 correlates to increased tissue damage, it is hypothesized that a quantitative reduction of MMP-9 in skin would reduce the tissue damage normally observed after SM exposure. Studies have shown some success in the use of protease inhibitors both in vitro in cell culture (Cowan et al., 2000) and in an in vivo mouse model (Powers et al., 2000). It was tested whether or not topical skin treatment with MMP-2/MMP-9 inhibitor I [(2R)-2-[(4-Biphenylylsulfonyl)amino]-3-phenylpropionic acid (Fig. 1B), was effective in reducing the secondary damage caused by MMP-9. Using microarray analysis, the major gene pathways that are activated in response to SM skin exposure were identified. The rationale for using microarray technology was that it may identify potential new target molecules or pathways that could be used for medical intervention against SM-induced injury. It also has the potential to identify biomarkers that could be used as quantitative tools for novel compound evaluation.
To date, there have only been a handful of microarray studies involving analysis of mouse skin treated with sulfur mustard (Rogers et al., 2004, Sabourin et al., 2004, Dillman et al., 2006). These studies only focused on gene changes at early time points within the first 24 h post exposure. The present study expanded the observed time-course to seven days in length. It also analyzed the impact of a specific MMP inhibitor to the SM-induced skin damage by assessing ear tissues from mice exposed to SM for histological damage (with and without topical pre-treatment with MMP-2/MMP-9 inhibitor I). Since microarray analysis data vary according to the method employed, analysis was performed using several different techniques in order to compare the gene variations with and without MMP-2/MMP-9 inhibitor I application and generate statistically significant data. A majority of the techniques employed in this study to analyze gene expression microarray data are supported by the USFDA's ArrayTrack system (Tong et al., 2003, Tong et al., 2004). In the present study, the multiple analysis methods supported by ArrayTrack were used, both within ArrayTrack and through links to other analysis platforms.
Section snippets
Experimental design
A schematic depiction of the experiments and subsequent analysis is shown in Fig. 2. The mice were divided into three groups (each group is represented by three post-exposure time-points). The three groups included: 1) untreated, control group; 2) mice treated with sulfur mustard; 3) mice treated with sulfur mustard after pre-treatment with the inhibitor. The microarray gene expression data were then analyzed to identify the genes that have been significantly expressed using several different
Results
The gene expression data were analyzed through different analysis techniques, including PCA, HCA, Gene GO analysis, KEGG pathway analysis, and IPA analysis. All the methods were consistent and showed that over 1000 genes were significantly expressed in mouse skin after sulfur mustard exposure. Fig. 3 depicts the hierarchical cluster analysis based on 24,681 genes with mean channel intensities in the arrays greater than 100. The control group separates from the SM-treated group, and demonstrates
Discussion
One ultimate goal of vesicant research is to identify potential effective medical countermeasures to alkylation injury of the skin and to identify biomarkers for different stages of vesicant injury and wound repair. This would provide the methodology to screen large numbers of novel compounds quickly and act as a qualitative tool to determine their potential effectiveness in alleviating damage or enhancing wound repair. One approach is to identify biomarkers that correlate to histological
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by the following grants: NIEHS sponsored UMDNJ Center for Environmental Exposures and Disease (Grant # NIEHS P30ES005022); NIH/NIEHS funded Training in Environmental Toxicology (ES004738); NIH/NEI funded Expression of Specialized Collagens in Cornea (EY09056); NIH funded CounterACT Program (NIAMS U54AR055073); and USEPA STAR Grant funded Environmental Bioinformatics and Computational Toxicology Center (GAD R 832721-010). Its contents are solely the
References (16)
Selecting maximally informative genes
Comput. Chem. Eng.
(2005)- et al.
Recent progress in the study of Hedgehog signaling
J. Genet. Genomics
(2008) - et al.
The inflammation-fibrosis link? A Jekyll and Hyde role for blood cells during wound repair
J. Invest. Dermatol.
(2007) - et al.
Development of public toxicogenomics software for microarray data management and analysis
Mutat. Res.
(2004) - et al.
Analysis of time-series gene expression data: methods, challenges, and opportunities
Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.
(2007) - et al.
Elastase and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors induce regression, and tenascin-C antisense prevents progression, of vascular disease
J. Clin. Invest.
(2000) - et al.
Microarray analysis of mouse ear tissue exposed to bis-(2-chloroethyl) sulfide: gene expression profiles correlate with treatment efficacy and an established clinical endpoint
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
(2006) Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA)
(2008)
Cited by (45)
A type IV collagenase inhibitor, N-hydroxy-3-phenyl-2-(4-phenylbenzenesulfonamido) propanamide (BiPS), suppresses skin injury induced by sulfur mustard
2020, Toxicology and Applied PharmacologyCitation Excerpt :Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) regulate the degradation and remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and BM proteins during cutaneous injury, inflammation, and wound healing (Martins et al., 2013; Yamamoto et al., 2015). However, overexpression of MMPs can exacerbate tissue damage induced by SM leading to delayed wound repair (Gerecke et al., 2009; Malaviya et al., 2010; Reiss et al., 2010; Shakarjian et al., 2010; Benson et al., 2011; Gordon et al., 2016). In earlier studies we demonstrated that preferential expression of MMP-9 in SM injured skin is an important mediator of blister formation; this suggests that targeting MMP-9 may be an effective therapeutic approach for mitigating SM-induced skin damage (Shakarjian et al., 2006).
Dermal toxicity of sulfur mustard
2020, Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare AgentsTear and serum MMP-9 and serum TIMPs levels in the severe sulfur mustard eye injured exposed patients
2019, International ImmunopharmacologyCitation Excerpt :It has been found that decreased MMP-9 activity in humans is associated with accelerated wound healing. So, MMP-9 could be a potential target of therapy for SM-induced ocular injury [37]. Different phases of SM-induced ocular toxicity are characterized by the following stages: immediate phase with photophobia, acute phase with corneal erosion with anterior segment inflammation, and delayed phase with epithelial defects, corneal neovascularization, and visual loss.
Establishment of a novel safety assessment method for vaccine adjuvant development
2018, VaccineCitation Excerpt :The theory and developmental history of this method are discussed in the following sections. Since the early 2000s, genomic technology has been integrated into toxicological evaluation during drug development [73] as a supplement to phenotypic change-based conventional toxicity tests [74–81]. Genomic analyses can detect early toxicity reactions, which cannot be detected as phenotypic changes, and identify the mechanisms of toxicity development [82].