Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as skin carcinogens: Comparison of benzo[a]pyrene, dibenzo[def,p]chrysene and three environmental mixtures in the FVB/N mouse

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2012.08.014Get rights and content

Abstract

The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), was compared to dibenzo[def,p]chrysene (DBC) and combinations of three environmental PAH mixtures (coal tar, diesel particulate and cigarette smoke condensate) using a two stage, FVB/N mouse skin tumor model. DBC (4 nmol) was most potent, reaching 100% tumor incidence with a shorter latency to tumor formation, less than 20 weeks of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) promotion compared to all other treatments. Multiplicity was 4 times greater than BaP (400 nmol). Both PAHs produced primarily papillomas followed by squamous cell carcinoma and carcinoma in situ. Diesel particulate extract (1 mg SRM 1650b; mix 1) did not differ from toluene controls and failed to elicit a carcinogenic response. Addition of coal tar extract (1 mg SRM 1597a; mix 2) produced a response similar to BaP. Further addition of 2 mg of cigarette smoke condensate (mix 3) did not alter the response with mix 2. PAH-DNA adducts measured in epidermis 12 h post initiation and analyzed by 32P post‐labeling, did not correlate with tumor incidence. PAH‐dependent alteration in transcriptome of skin 12 h post initiation was assessed by microarray. Principal component analysis (sum of all treatments) of the 922 significantly altered genes (p < 0.05), showed DBC and BaP to cluster distinct from PAH mixtures and each other. BaP and mixtures up-regulated phase 1 and phase 2 metabolizing enzymes while DBC did not. The carcinogenicity with DBC and two of the mixtures was much greater than would be predicted based on published Relative Potency Factors (RPFs).

Highlights

► Dibenzo[def,p]chrysene (DBC), 3 PAH mixtures, benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) were compared. ► DBC and 2 PAH mixtures were more potent than Relative Potency Factor estimates. ► Transcriptome profiles 12 hours post initiation were analyzed by microarray. ► Principle components analysis of alterations revealed treatment-based clustering. ► DBC gave a unique pattern of gene alterations compared to BaP and PAH mixtures.

Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are planar aromatic compounds with varying potencies of carcinogenicity defined by their individual structures (IARC, 2010). PAHs occur naturally in the environment in fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and tar and are considered environmental pollutants formed during incomplete combustion (coal, tobacco, diesel, asphalt, creosote, gasoline, wood smoke, etc.) leading to their presence in air, food and soils (Ding et al., 2011, Lewtas, 2007, Lijinsky, 1991, Weissenfels et al., 1992). PAHs occur in the environment typically as mixtures covering a spectrum from non‐toxic compounds to potent carcinogens (Allan et al., 2012, Baird et al., 2005, Mao et al., 2007, Wickramasinghe et al., 2012). Different types of combustion result in different compositions of PAHs both in relative amounts and individual PAHs present (Poster et al., 2000). Occupational exposure to PAH mixtures in aluminum production, iron and steel foundries, fossil fuel processing, wood impregnation, roofing and road sealing can pose risks for lung, skin, and bladder cancers (Boffetta et al., 1997, Cogliano et al., 2011, IARC, 2010). Epidemiological studies support a relationship between dermal exposure to PAHs and skin cancers (Boffetta et al., 1997, IARC, 2010, Marczynski et al., 2009). One of the most common cancers in Caucasian populations is non-melanoma skin cancer, recently reported to be on the rise throughout the world (Lomas et al., 2012). Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), the most extensively studied carcinogenic PAH, is classified by IARC as a Group 1 or known human carcinogen (IARC, 2010). Four of the top ten priority pollutants, designated by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) in 2011, are single PAHs or PAH mixtures (PAHs, BaP, benzo[b]fluoranthene, and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene) (ATSDR, 2011).

PAHs are carcinogenic in a number of animal models with multiple targets, including skin (Arif et al., 1999, Courter et al., 2008, Darwiche et al., 2007, IARC, 2010, Nesnow et al., 1998, Wester et al., 2011). Our laboratories have documented that dibenzo[def,p]chrysene (DBC), formerly referred to as dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, is a potent carcinogen in mice (Castro et al., 2008a, Mahadevan et al., 2007a, Marston et al., 2001, Yu et al., 2006a, Yu et al., 2006b). Oral administration results in tumors of the liver, lung, breast, ovaries and hematopoietic tissue. DBC can also be an effective transplacental carcinogen (Castro et al., 2008a, Castro et al., 2008b, Chen et al., 2012, Guttenplan et al., 2011, Shorey et al., 2012, Yu et al., 2006a, Yu et al., 2006b).

PAHs require bioactivation through metabolism in order to be mutagenic, carcinogenic or teratogenic to target cellular macromolecules (Baird and Mahadevan, 2004, IARC, 2010). With higher molecular weight PAHs, such as BaP and DBC containing a “bay” and/or “fjord” region, respectively, the most well characterized bioactivation pathway has been cytochrome P450 (CYP)‐dependent epoxygenation, hydrolysis by epoxide hydrolase and a second CYP epoxygenation to the 7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10 epoxide (BPDE) in the case of BaP, and to the 11,12-dihydrodiol-13,14 epoxide (DBCDE) in the case of DBC (Shimada, 2006, Shou et al., 1996, Xue and Warshawsky, 2005). Hydrolysis of the initial epoxide produces two trans stereoisomers and the second epoxygenation can be above or below the plane of the ring; thus, four possible BPDEs or DBCDEs are produced (Fig. 1). With BaP, the most mutagenic and carcinogenic BPDE is thought to be (+)-7,8-anti-9,10-BPDE. PAHs such as BaP and DBC can also be bioactivated through 1-electron oxidations (peroxidases) producing radical cations (Cavalieri and Rogan, 1992, Cavelieri and Rogan, 1995), predominantly at the 1,6- and 3,6-positions. Once formed these radical cations may bind to DNA. The role of aldo–keto reductases (AKRs) in bioactivation of PAHs has also been demonstrated (Palackal et al., 2001, Palackal et al., 2002, Penning et al., 1996). AKRs effectively convert the PAH dihydrodiol to a catechol. As with other catechols, a redox-cycling can then occur through 1-electron reactions to the semi-quinone and quinone. These reversible reactions generate superoxide anion radical and other reactive oxygen species (ROS) and can also directly react with nucleophilic sites on DNA. The metabolism of PAHs through peroxidative and AKR-mediated pathways is consistent with oxidative stress‐associated PAH toxicity (Kumar et al., 2012).

The most important CYPs in PAH metabolism are CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, and to a lesser extent CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 (Shimada, 2006). Recent evidence from our laboratories and others has suggested that CYP1B1 plays a predominant role in the toxicity and carcinogenicity of both BaP and DBC in the mouse (Castro et al., 2008a, Uno et al., 2006).

The murine two-stage skin tumor model has been used extensively to investigate mechanisms of carcinogenesis (Cavalieri et al., 1991, Higginbotham et al., 1993) and the inbred FVB strain has been shown to be suitable for initiation/promotion studies (Hennings et al., 1993). This model is a powerful tool for studying early indicators of “high risk” papillomas that can develop into invasive squamous cell carcinomas (Glick et al., 2007). The vast majority of cancer studies in animal models have tested single PAHs. Unfortunately this is incongruous with the complex mixtures of PAHs to which human populations are exposed. In this study we sought to examine the relative potency of BaP and DBC, compared to combinations of some environmentally relevant PAH mixtures. We hypothesized that early PAH-dependent alterations in the transcriptome of mouse epidermis following initiation could be correlated with DNA adduct formation at the same time point and predict probable tumor outcomes. The EPA is currently evaluating the potential of a Relative Potency Factor (RPF) approach in estimating risk for exposure to PAH mixtures (U.S. EPA, 2010). Our results demonstrate that, at least with respect to skin cancer following dermal exposures, the RPF markedly underestimates DBC and PAH mixture potencies. Furthermore, alterations in gene expression 12 h post-initiation suggest the strong possibility that these PAH treatments are acting through multiple and distinct mechanisms.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Caution: BaP and DBC are potent carcinogens and should be handled in accordance with National Cancer Institute (NCI) guidelines. All pure PAHs and mixtures were prepared under UV depleted light.

Time to tumor, multiplicity, and progression

Toluene control and diesel extract (mix 1) treatment groups were similar in time to tumor (p > 0.5). These two treatments were also very different from the other treatments (p < 0.0001 for all pairwise comparisons). BaP and the remaining two mixtures, DPE + CTE (mix 2), and DPE + CTE + CSC (mix 3), had similar outcomes to one another for time until tumor event (p > 0.5 all 3 pairwise comparisons) and were different from controls (p < 0.001), DPE (p < 0.001) and DBC (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2). Control and mix 1

Discussion

The mouse skin initiation–promotion model has been used extensively to assess the carcinogenicity of numerous PAHs, singularly and as mixtures (IARC, 2010, LaVoie et al., 1993). The EPA and other agencies use this data, along with results from other animal models, to assess the RPF for PAHs. In this study we employed female FVB/N mice to compare the potency of some complex PAH mixtures found in the environment to the characterized skin carcinogens BaP and DBC. Given the marked increase in tumor

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health (grants P42ES016465 and P42ES016465-S1). Work at King's College London is supported by Cancer Research UK.

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors of this manuscript have any conflicts of interest associated with this work.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Margaret Pratt of US EPA, IRIS/NCEA/ORD, Washington D.C., Dr. Kim Anderson's lab and Glen Wilson in particular, Erin Madeen, Anna Sherman, and Brady Do, Sarah Tscheu, Oregon State University, for their varied technical assistance. Cigarette smoke condensate was a generous gift from Hollie Swanson, University of Kentucky. Bradley Stewart carried out the Agilent array work at the University of Wisconsin EDGE3 Core Facility. Volker M. Arlt and David H. Phillips are

References (66)

  • J. Niestroy et al.

    Single and concerted effects of benzo[a]pyrene and flavonoids on the AhR and Nrf2-pathway in the human colon carcinoma cell line Caco-2

    Toxicol. In Vitro

    (2011)
  • N.T. Palackal et al.

    Activation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon trans-dihydrodiol proximate carcinogens by human aldo–keto reductase (AKR1C) enzymes and their functional overexpression in human lung carcinoma (A549) cells

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • T. Shimada

    Xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes involved in activation and detoxification of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

    Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet.

    (2006)
  • L.E. Shorey et al.

    Transplacental carcinogenesis with dibenzo[def, p]chrysene (DBC): timing of maternal exposures determines target tissue response in offspring

    Cancer Lett.

    (2012)
  • T.J. Slaga et al.

    Fractionation of mouse epidermal chromatin components

    J. Invest. Dermatol.

    (1974)
  • A.P. Wickramasinghe et al.

    PM(10)-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: biological indicators, lung cancer risk of realistic receptors and ‘source–exposure–effect relationship’ under different source scenarios

    Chemosphere

    (2012)
  • W. Xue et al.

    Metabolic activation of polycyclic and heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and DNA damage: a review

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (2005)
  • S.E. Allan et al.

    Impact of the deepwater horizon oil spill on bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in gulf of Mexico coastal waters

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2012)
  • J.M. Arif et al.

    DNA adduct formation and persistence in rat tissues following exposure to the mammary carcinogen dibenzo[a, l]pyrene

    Carcinogenesis

    (1999)
  • V.M. Arlt et al.

    Metabolic activation of benzo[a]pyrene in vitro by hepatic cytochrome P450 contrasts with detoxification in vivo: experiments with hepatic cytochrome P450 reductase null mice

    Carcinogenesis

    (2008)
  • ATSDR

    Priority list of hazardous substances

  • W.M. Baird et al.

    Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts and mechanism of action

    Environ. Mol. Mutagen.

    (2005)
  • P. Boffetta et al.

    Cancer risk from occupational and environmental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

    Cancer Causes Control

    (1997)
  • B.M. Bolstad et al.

    A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias

    Bioinformatics

    (2003)
  • J.T.M. Buters et al.

    Cytochrome P450 1B1 determines susceptibility to dibenzo[a, l]pyrene-induced tumor formation

    Chem. Res. Toxicol.

    (2002)
  • D.J. Castro et al.

    Fetal mouse Cyp1b1 and transplacental carcinogenesis from maternal exposure to dibenzo(a, l)pyrene

    Cancer Prev. Res.

    (2008)
  • E.L. Cavalieri et al.

    The approach to understanding aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogenesis. The central role of radical cations in metabolic activation

    Pharmacol. Ther.

    (1992)
  • E.L. Cavalieri et al.

    Comparative dose–response tumorigenicity studies of dibenzo[alpha, l]pyrene versus 7,12-dimethylbenz[alpha]anthracene, benzo[alpha]pyrene and two dibenzo[alpha, l]pyrene dihydrodiols in mouse skin and rat mammary gland

    Carcinogenesis

    (1991)
  • E.L. Cavelieri et al.

    Central role of radical cations in metabolic activation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

    Xenobiotica

    (1995)
  • K.M. Chen et al.

    Induction of ovarian cancer and DNA adducts by dibenzo[a, l]pyrene in the mouse

    Chem. Res. Toxicol.

    (2012)
  • V.J. Cogliano et al.

    Preventable exposures associated with human cancers

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (2011)
  • L.A. Courter et al.

    Urban dust particulate matter alters PAH-induced carcinogenesis by inhibition of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1

    Toxicol. Sci.

    (2006)
  • N. Darwiche et al.

    Expression profile of skin papillomas with high cancer risk displays a unique genetic signature that clusters with squamous cell carcinomas and predicts risk for malignant conversion

    Oncogene

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text