Trends in Biochemical Sciences
OpinionFuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein–protein interactions
Section snippets
Structural heterogeneity of proteins and their complexes
Proteins are engaged in a complex array of physical and functional interactions with other proteins and macromolecules under physiological conditions. It is believed that the full molecular description of the resulting set of interactions (i.e. the interactome) will ultimately lead to a complete understanding of the functioning of the cell 1, 2. Current high-throughput studies on the expression, interactions and structure of all cellular constituents in the free and complexed states aim to
Static disorder in protein complexes
Structural heterogeneity can be a result of distinct, well-defined conformations. This might range from a few to a multitude of alternative structures that could be individually solved depending on the resolution of the technique applied. Distinct bound conformations might serve various functions by having different effects on the partner.
Dynamic disorder in complexes
Proteins, even in the bound state, can fluctuate between various structures of a dynamic ensemble. The disordered regions can carry important functions, such as increasing the conformational freedom and adaptability of two binding regions (clamp model), or providing a site for other binding partners or post-translational modifications (flanking model). At the extreme, disorder of the entire chain could provide an entirely novel solution to transient protein–protein interactions (random model).
Interactions without strict sequence constraints
The results of a range of unusual mutagenesis studies might also conform to the concept of fuzziness. In these special cases, no effect on the biological function is seen following the scrambling of the primary sequence of the IDP or IDR involved (Table 2). This suggests that a biological function that results from protein–protein interactions could be independent of the actual sequence. These observations are in sharp contrast to all existing models of protein–protein recognition, and even in
Concluding remarks: a structural and functional view of fuzziness
The observation of fuzziness in protein complexes raises two interdependent questions: (i) how can we interpret fuzziness structurally and (ii) what is the functional and evolutionary role of this phenomenon?
The structural view of fuzziness is straightforward in the case of the static models, when alternative bound conformations enabled by the adaptability of the isolated molecule emerge, in accord with the binding promiscuity already suggested for IDPs [51]. In dynamic cases, however, several
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants OTKA K60694 and F046164 from the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund, ETT 245/2006 from the Hungarian Ministry of Health, International Senior Research Fellowship ISRF 067595 from the Wellcome Trust (to P.T.), MRTN-CT-2005–019566 of the European FP6 and a Bolyai fellowship (to M.F.).
Glossary
- CBD
- β-catenin binding domain of Tcf4.
- Cdc4p
- cell-division cycle 4 protein, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets Sic1, a cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitor, for degradation.
- CFTR
- cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, a phosphorylation-regulated Cl− channel in the epithelial cell membrane.
- CREB
- cyclic AMP response element-binding protein, a transcription factor responding to elevated cAMP levels.
- CTD
- C-terminal domain of proteins.
- DFF40
- DNA fragmentation factor 40, responsible for
References (58)
Intrinsically unstructured proteins
Trends Biochem. Sci.
(2002)The interplay between structure and function in intrinsically unstructured proteins
FEBS Lett.
(2005)Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life
J. Mol. Biol.
(2004)- et al.
Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
(2002) Intrinsic protein disorder, amino acid composition, and histone terminal domains
J. Biol. Chem.
(2006)- et al.
Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm
J. Mol. Biol.
(1999) Conformational diversity in the TPR domain-mediated interaction of protein phosphatase 5 with Hsp90
Structure
(2006)Structural basis of recognition of monopartite and bipartite nuclear localization sequences by mammalian importin-alpha
J. Mol. Biol.
(2000)Functional amyloid – from bacteria to humans
Trends Biochem. Sci.
(2007)Structural disorder throws new light on moonlighting
Trends Biochem. Sci.
(2005)
Domains of phosphatase inhibitor-2 involved in the control of the ATP-Mg-dependent protein phosphatase
J. Biol. Chem.
Docking interactions in protein kinase and phosphatase networks
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
Protein disorder: conformational distribution of the flexible linker in a chimeric double cellulase
Biophys. J.
A flexible domain is essential for the large step size and processivity of myosin VI
Mol. Cell
Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs)
J. Mol. Biol.
Roles of phosphorylation and helix propensity in the binding of the KIX domain of CREB-binding protein by constitutive (c-Myb) and inducible (CREB) activators
J. Biol. Chem.
Structural basis for the molecular recognition between human splicing factors U2AF65 and SF1/mBBP
Mol. Cell
Structural basis for the binding of proline-rich peptides to SH3 domains
Cell
High affinity streptococcal binding to human fibronectin requires specific recognition of sequential f1 modules
J. Biol. Chem.
The potency and specificity of the interaction between the IA3 inhibitor and its target aspartic proteinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Biol. Chem.
Integrating mRNA processing with transcription
Cell
Multichain immune recognition receptor signaling: different players, same game?
Trends Immunol.
Quantitative observation of backbone disorder in native elastin
J. Biol. Chem.
Proline and glycine control protein self-organization into elastomeric or amyloid fibrils
Structure
Linear motifs: evolutionary interaction switches
FEBS Lett.
The strength of acidic activation domains correlates with their affinity for both transcriptional and non-transcriptional proteins
J. Mol. Biol.
Mechanism of transcription factor recruitment by acidic activators
J. Biol. Chem.
Structure of an ultraweak protein-protein complex and its crucial role in regulation of cell morphology and motility
Mol. Cell
Solution structure of the KIX domain of CBP bound to the transactivation domain of CREB: a model for activator:coactivator interactions
Cell
Cited by (857)
Intrinsically disordered proteins studied by NMR spectroscopy
2024, Journal of Magnetic Resonance OpenA poly-histidine motif of HOXA1 is involved in regulatory interactions with cysteine-rich proteins
2024, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Regulatory MechanismsLeucine Motifs Stabilize Residual Helical Structure in Disordered Proteins
2024, Journal of Molecular BiologyRecent advances in de novo computational design and redesign of intrinsically disordered proteins and intrinsically disordered protein regions
2024, Archives of Biochemistry and BiophysicsMultivalency emerges as a common feature of intrinsically disordered protein interactions
2024, Current Opinion in Structural Biology