Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence
Section snippets
Differential approach to the relation between WMC and g
The following review of individual differences studies of WMC and g (or general reasoning ability) is restricted to projects that used latent variable analyses (see Box 1). This criterion was adopted for two reasons. First, latent variables provide a cleaner measure of the construct under investigation and therefore these analyses provide the clearest picture of the true relation between WMC and g. Second, the number of published papers containing at least one correlation between a single
Cognitive-experimental investigations of the basic processes underlying WM span tasks
One way in which the processes that contribute to WM span tasks has been explored has been to contrast the cognitive contexts in which individual differences in WM span relate, and do not relate, to performance. For example, a large and diverse group of subjects are screened using WM span tasks, and individuals with greater WMC are compared with individuals with lesser WMC in different experimental contexts. Although it is not ideal to categorize a continuous variable in this fashion, the
Neuroimaging studies of WMC and g
The distinction between tasks that require storage versus those that require storage and some form of processing can also be found in the neuroimaging literature [12]. For instance, several studies have shown that storage-only tasks reveal activation primarily in areas related to the content of the to-be-remembered material (e.g. Broca's area for verbal material, right-hemisphere pre-motor cortex for spatial material) [12], whereas storage-plus-processing tasks reveal content-specific
Future issues: the current range of WMC tasks is still too wide
It is clear that the creation and selection of WMC tasks is more principled today than it was in 1990. However, the fact remains that a wide range of tasks are still being used to measure WMC and it is not clear how all these tasks relate to one another or to g. Here we consider tasks other than WM span and call for future research that addresses (1) the basic processes involved in these tasks, and (2) the relation between these tasks, WM span tasks, and g.
One problem with WM span tasks is that
Conclusion
In summary, several recent latent variable analyses suggest that WMC accounts for at least one-third and perhaps as much as one-half of the variance in g. What seems to be important about WM span tasks is that they require the active maintenance of information in the face of concurrent processing and interference and therefore recruit an executive attention-control mechanism to combat interference. Furthermore, this ability seems to be mediated by portions of the prefrontal cortex.
Although
References (44)
A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence
Intelligence
(2002)Human intelligence differences: towards a combined experimental-differential approach
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2001)- et al.
Genetics and general cognitive ability (g)
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2002) - et al.
Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!
Intelligence
(1990) - et al.
Working memory
- et al.
Individual differences in working memory and reading
J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav.
(1980) Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability – and a little bit more
Intelligence
(2002)- et al.
Working memory capacity and suppression
J. Mem. Lang.
(1998) Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span
J. Exp. Child Psychol.
(1982)Is working memory capacity Spearman's g?