Elsevier

Toxicology Letters

Volume 205, Issue 3, 10 September 2011, Pages 293-301
Toxicology Letters

Sulfur mustard analog, 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide-induced skin injury involves DNA damage and induction of inflammatory mediators, in part via oxidative stress, in SKH-1 hairless mouse skin

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.06.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Bifunctional alkyalating agent, sulfur mustard (SM)-induced cutaneous injury is characterized by inflammation and delayed blistering. Our recent studies demonstrated that 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES), a monofunctional analog of SM that can be used in laboratory settings, induces oxidative stress. This could be the major cause of the activation of Akt/MAP kinase and AP1/NF-ĪŗB pathways that are linked to the inflammation and microvesication, and histopathological alterations in SKH-1 hairless mouse skin. To further establish a link between CEES-induced DNA damage and signaling pathways and inflammatory responses, skin samples from mice exposed to 2Ā mg or 4Ā mg CEES for 9ā€“48Ā h were subjected to molecular analysis. Our results show a strong CEES-induced phosphorylation of H2A.X and an increase in cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), inducible NOS (iNOS), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels, indicating the involvement of DNA damage and inflammation in CEES-induced skin injury in male and female mice. Since, our recent studies showed reduction in CEES-induced inflammatory responses by glutathione (GSH), we further assessed the role of oxidative stress in CEES-related DNA damage and the induction of inflammatory molecules. Oral GSH (300Ā mg/kg) administration 1Ā h before CEES exposure attenuated the increase in both CEES-induced H2A.X phosphorylation (59%) as well as expression of COX-2 (68%), iNOS (53%) and MMP-9 (54%). Collectively, our results indicate that CEES-induced skin injury involves DNA damage and an induction of inflammatory mediators, at least in part via oxidative stress. This study could help in identifying countermeasures that alone or in combination, can target the unveiled pathways for reducing skin injury in humans by SM.

Highlights

ā€¢ CEES causes phosphorylation of H2A.X and increases COX-2, iNOS and MMP-9 levels in SKH1 hairless mouse skin. ā€¢ GSH reverses CEES-induced DNA damage and induction of inflammatory regulators signifying oxidative stress as a major player.

Introduction

Sulfur mustard (bis(2-chloroethyl) sulfide, SM) is a powerful vesicating (blistering) and bifunctional alkylating warfare agent, which readily penetrates the skin causing histopathological changes, related to inflammation, and delayed blistering (Wormser, 1991, Dacre and Goldman, 1996, Pal et al., 2009). The first target of SM is the basal epidermal keratinocytes; it causes apoptotic cell death followed by protease digestion of anchoring filaments at epidermalā€“dermal junctions leading to a skin blistering response via epidermalā€“dermal separation (Kan et al., 2003, Greenberg et al., 2006, Hayden et al., 2009). The mechanism/s of SM-caused responses has been linked mainly to its alkylating property, and its effect on nucleophilic antioxidant, and glutathione (GSH) depletion. GSH depletion could lead to oxidative stress and macromolecular damage, including that of DNA that possibly induces the activation of signaling pathways (Rice, 2003, Kehe and Szinicz, 2005, Paromov et al., 2007, Brimfield et al., 2009, Jowsey et al., 2009, Laskin et al., 2010, Shakarjian et al., 2010, Tewari-Singh et al., 2010). The cellular GSH depletion could be due to its conjugation with SM, and protective effects of exogenous GSH and its precursor, NAC, in reducing SM or its analog-induced skin toxicity have been reported (Gross et al., 1993, Smith et al., 1997, Amir et al., 1998, Han et al., 2004, Arfsten et al., 2007, Paromov et al., 2007).

Several reported studies including a study in cylooxygenase-2 (COX-2) null mice suggest that COX-2, and COX-derived prostaglandins are important inflammatory mediators in SM-induced skin toxicity (Casillas et al., 2000, Nyska et al., 2001, Wormser et al., 2004). Nitric oxide synthases (NOSs), mainly endothelial NOS (eNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS), predominantly found in mononuclear phagocytes and neutrophils, are the proposed important inflammatory mediators in SM-induced skin toxicity (Nyska et al., 2001, Gao et al., 2007). SM induced up-regulation of iNOS expression is shown to lead to the production of nitric oxide (NO), a potent oxidizing agent. However, at lower concentrations, NO acts as an antioxidant and plays a role in would healing (Gao et al., 2007). After SM exposure, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family proteases are reported to be up-regulated causing the degradation of extracellular proteins, which are the major component of basement membrane and separate epidermis from dermis causing vesication (Shakarjian et al., 2010). Constitutively expressed matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) (induced by cytokines, chemokines) are the most studied MMPs in SM-induced skin toxicity. Additionally, MMP-9 has been shown to play an important role in SM-induced skin toxicity using the mouse ear vesicant model (Johansson et al., 1997, Van den Steen et al., 2002, Shakarjian et al., 2006).

Because the molecular mechanism/s involved in SM-induced blistering and skin inflammation are not completely known, the identification of effective medical countermeasures for SM-caused skin injuries has not been possible. Consequently, to further understand the mechanism of SM-induced skin injury, we conducted studies in the SKH-1 hairless mouse using the monofunctional sulfur mustard analog, 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES). Due to the requirement of containment facilities for SM, CEES has been widely used as a valid experimental alternative to SM for studies in laboratory settings (Han et al., 2004, Jowsey et al., 2009, Tewari-Singh et al., 2009). This research demonstrated the induction of oxidative stress by CEES leading to the activation of transcription factors AP-1 and nuclear factor-ĪŗB (NF-ĪŗB) via upstream signaling pathways including mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and Akt, which were identified as possible mechanisms of the inflammatory responses observed in this skin injury model (Pal et al., 2009, Tewari-Singh et al., 2009). To further establish a link between CEES-induced signaling pathways and inflammatory responses, our objective in the present study was to analyze the involvement of DNA damage and inflammatory mediators in CEES-induced inflammatory and microvesication responses in SKH-1 hairless mice. Furthermore, because our earlier studies showed the involvement of GSH and oxidative stress in CEES-induced molecular and biological responses (Pal et al., 2009, Tewari-Singh et al., 2009, Tewari-Singh et al., 2011), we also assessed their impact on DNA damage and the expression of inflammatory mediators in the present study. This study is a valuable addition in understanding of the mechanism of action of SM analog. Additionally, the study outcomes could help in the selection of countermeasures, which alone or in combination can target the identified pathways to attenuate SM and other vesicating agentsā€™ related skin injuries in humans.

Section snippets

Materials

The sulfur mustard analog, CEES was from Sigmaā€“Aldrich Chemicals Co (St. Louis, MO). MMP-2 antibody was from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). MMP-9, H2A.X phospho ser139 antibodies and anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibody was from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverley, MA). COX-1 and COX-2 antibodies were from Cayman chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI), iNOS antibody was from Abcam (Cambridge, MA) and Ī²-actin antibody was from Sigmaā€“Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO). Protein

Topical application of CEES induces an increase in H2A.X phosphorylation at ser139

SM is a highly reactive alkylating agent and its skin exposure is reported to lead to DNA damage, eventually inducing cell death, inflammation and cytotoxicity (Rogakou et al., 1998, Jowsey et al., 2009, Black et al., 2010). The DNA damage, especially the double strand breaks, triggers the phosphorylation of histone variant H2A.X at serine 139 and is considered to be a reporter of DNA double strand breaks required for cell cycle checkpoint arrest and DNA repair (Rogakou et al., 1998, Huang and

Discussion

Outcomes of this study suggest that both DNA damage and inflammatory mediators are an important link between our earlier reported CEES-induced signaling pathways and skin injury responses involving oxidative stress (Pal et al., 2009, Tewari-Singh et al., 2009, Jain et al., 2011). Our studies employed SKH-1 hairless mouse model as reported earlier (Pal et al., 2009, Tewari-Singh et al., 2009, Jain et al., 2011) because it is the most widely used mouse model in skin research due to being

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Countermeasures Against Chemical Threats (CounterACT) Program, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of the Director, and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Grant Number (U54 ES-015678). The study sponsor (NIH) had no involvement in the study design; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript; nor the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References (71)

  • K. Kehe et al.

    Molecular toxicology of sulfur mustard-induced cutaneous inflammation and blistering

    Toxicology

    (2009)
  • K. Kehe et al.

    Medical aspects of sulphur mustard poisoning

    Toxicology

    (2005)
  • A.M. Kligman et al.

    A hairless mouse model for assessing the chronic toxicity of topically applied chemicals

    Food Chem. Toxicol.

    (1998)
  • O.H. Lowry et al.

    Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1951)
  • C.B. Millard et al.

    Cutaneous exposure to bis-(2-chloroethyl)sulfide results in neutrophil infiltration and increased solubility of 180,000Ā Mr subepidermal collagens

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1997)
  • M.A. Mol et al.

    Involvement of caspases and transmembrane metalloproteases in sulphur mustard-induced microvesication in adult human skin in organ culture: directions for therapy

    Toxicology

    (2009)
  • A. Pal et al.

    Sulfur mustard analog induces oxidative stress and activates signaling cascades in the skin of SKH-1 hairless mice

    Free Radic. Biol. Med.

    (2009)
  • C. Ries et al.

    Matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression and release from skin fibroblasts interacting with keratinocytes: upregulation in response to sulphur mustard

    Toxicology

    (2009)
  • E.P. Rogakou et al.

    DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • K.J. Smith et al.

    Sulfur mustard: its continuing threat as a chemical warfare agent, the cutaneous lesions induced, progress in understanding its mechanism of action, its long-term health effects, and new developments for protection and therapy

    J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.

    (1995)
  • S.P. Stabler et al.

    Effects of parenteral cysteine and glutathione feeding in a baboon model of severe prematurity

    Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

    (2000)
  • J.C. Tsai et al.

    Effect of barrier disruption by acetone treatment on the permeability of compounds with various lipophilicities: implications for the permeability of compromised skin

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2001)
  • U. Wormser

    Toxicology of mustard gas

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (1991)
  • U. Wormser et al.

    Reduced sulfur mustard-induced skin toxicity in cyclooxygenase-2 knockout and celecoxib-treated mice

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (2004)
  • A. Amir et al.

    Protection by extracellular glutathione against sulfur mustard induced toxicity in vitro

    Hum. Exp. Toxicol.

    (1998)
  • D.P. Arfsten et al.

    Distribution of radio-labeled N-acetyl-l-cysteine in Sprague-Dawley rats and its effect on glutathione metabolism following single and repeat dosing by oral gavage

    Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol.

    (2007)
  • W. Bloch et al.

    Comparison of sulfur mustard induced mechanism of cell damage in dependency of time course and cell type

    Toxicology

    (2007)
  • R.P. Casillas et al.

    Therapeutic approaches to dermatotoxicity by sulfur mustard I. Modulaton of sulfur mustard-induced cutaneous injury in the mouse ear vesicant model

    J. Appl. Toxicol.

    (2000)
  • Y.C. Chang et al.

    Upregulation of gamma-2 laminin-332 in the mouse ear vesicant wound model

    J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol.

    (2009)
  • F.M. Cowan et al.

    Putative role of proteolysis and inflammatory response in the toxicity of nerve and blister chemical warfare agents: implications for multi-threat medical countermeasures

    J. Appl. Toxicol.

    (2003)
  • J.C. Dacre et al.

    Toxicology and pharmacology of the chemical warfare agent sulfur mustard

    Pharmacol. Rev.

    (1996)
  • X. Gao et al.

    Inhibition of sulfur mustard-induced cytotoxicity and inflammation by the macrolide antibiotic roxithromycin in human respiratory epithelial cells

    BMC Cell Biol.

    (2007)
  • D.W. Gilroy et al.

    Inducible cyclooxygenase may have anti-inflammatory properties

    Nat. Med.

    (1999)
  • N.S. Gould et al.

    A role for mitochondrial oxidative stress in sulfur mustard analog 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide-induced lung cell injury and antioxidant protection

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (2009)
  • S. Greenberg et al.

    Characterization of the initial response of engineered human skin to sulfur mustard

    Toxicol. Sci.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Dermal toxicity of sulfur mustard

      2020, Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text