Elsevier

Urology

Volume 73, Issue 6, June 2009, Pages 1328-1334
Urology

Oncology
Effect of Percentage of Positive Prostate Biopsy Cores on Biochemical Outcome in Low-risk PCa Treated With Brachytherapy or 3D-CRT

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.078Get rights and content

Objectives

To investigate the significance of the percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPBCs) in predicting the biochemical outcome in patients with low-risk prostate cancer undergoing brachytherapy or three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (3D-CRT).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 360 patients with low-risk prostate cancer who had undergone low dose-rate brachytherapy (125I) or 3D-CRT from 1993 to 2006. Of the 360 patients, 189 had undergone 3D-CRT and 171 had undergone brachytherapy. The patients were stratified according to treatment modality and PPBCs (<34%, 34%-50%, >50%). Biochemical failure was defined by the 2006 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Phoenix Consensus Conference definition.

Results

The median follow-up in the 3D-CRT and brachytherapy groups was 51 and 37 months, respectively. The number of patients who had a PPBCs of <34%, 34%-50%, and >50% in the 3D-CRT and brachytherapy cohorts was 154, 26, and 9 and 133, 25, and 15, respectively. The 5-year freedom from biochemical failure rate for 3D-CRT and brachytherapy was 95% and 96%, respectively; the corresponding median prostate-specific antigen nadirs were 0.7 and 0.3 ng/mL (P < .001). No significant differences were found in age, stage, Gleason score, or PPBCs between the 2 cohorts. Cox regression analysis showed that the pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, stage, PPBCs, and treatment modality did not predict for the time to biochemical failure. When stratified by PPBCs, no significant difference in FFBF for either modality was seen.

Conclusions

In patients with low-risk prostate cancer, brachytherapy and 3D-CRT remain excellent treatment choices, regardless of the tumor volume as estimated by the PPBCs. Longer follow-up and the recruitment of men with a greater volume of disease (>50% PPBCs) are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Section snippets

Patient Selection

From 1993 to 2006, a total of 360 patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PSA ≤10 ng/mL, Gleason score ≤6, and clinical Stage T1c or T2a) evaluated at the Kimmel Cancer Center Genitourinary Multidisciplinary cancer clinic at Thomas Jefferson University were retrospectively identified. Of these 360 patients, 189 had undergone 3D-CRT and 171 had undergone brachytherapy. Patients undergoing androgen suppression therapy were excluded. Table 1 lists the pretreatment demographics of the patient

Results

The patient treatment demographics are listed in Table 1. Of the 360 patients included in this study, 189 had undergone 3D-CRT and 171 had undergone brachytherapy. The median age of the 3D-CRT group was 70 years (range 49-83), and the median age for the brachytherapy group was 65 years (range 42-78). Most patients in both groups had Stage cT1c disease (77% 3D-CRT and 80% brachytherapy). The median follow-up was 52 months (range 1-148) for the 3D-CRT group and was 36 months (range 1-114) for the

Comment

The pretreatment risk groups established by D'Amico et al.4 identified a correlation between clinical T stage, pretreatment PSA level, and biopsy Gleason score with freedom from PSA recurrence. Efforts have been made to determine other prognostic variables to aid in predicting the clinical and pathologic outcomes, as well as to provide optimal patient counseling regarding treatment modalities. The PPBCs has already been associated with tumor volume,15 adverse pathologic features such as

Conclusions

Low-risk prostate cancer has become the predominant presentation of disease in clinical practice today.2 In addition, there is an increasing trend for patients in this group to receive radiotherapy or brachytherapy as curative treatment.3 When considering the tumor volume, as measured by the PPBCs, we found no significant difference between patients receiving brachytherapy or 3D-CRT for the treatment of low-risk disease. On the basis of these findings, in patients with low-risk prostate cancer,

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text