Original article
Tissue microarray based analysis of prognostic markers in invasive bladder cancer: Much effort to no avail?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.08.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate altered protein expression with tissue microarray methodology for 15 different markers with potential prognostic significance in invasive bladder cancer.

Materials and Methods

Invasive tumor was sampled with the tissue-arraying instrument in 133 consecutive patients who underwent radical cystectomy, and at least 3, 0.6-mm tissue cores were obtained. With immunohistochemistry, the expressions of TP53, RB1, CDKN1A (p21), MKI67 (Ki67), PTGS2 (Cox-2), CTNNA1 (α-catenin), CTNNB1 (β-catenin), AKT, PTEN, RHOA, RHOC, STAT1, VEGFC, EGFR, and ERBB2 (HER2) were quantified, and correlations were made with tumor grade, pathologic stage, lymph node status, and disease-specific survival.

Results

Decreased immunohistochemical expression of CTNNA1 and of PTEN correlated with higher pathologic tumor stages (P = 0.01 and P = 0.01, respectively), whereas increased AKT1 and ERBB2 correlated with lower pathologic tumor stages (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). Increased RHOA expression was more common in grade 3 than in grade 2 tumors (P = 0.016). There were no other correlations among the 15 factors studied and pathologic stage, lymph node status, or tumor grade. No association was found between bladder cancer death and altered marker status for any of the markers studied.

Conclusions

Currently, there are reasons to have a skeptical attitude toward the value of tissue microarray based immunohistochemistry as a method for evaluating prognostic markers in invasive bladder cancer. In this study, 15 antibodies were tested but were found to be of little clinical value. Whether this negative finding is related to the group of patients or factors studied, or the methodology is unclear.

Introduction

Cancer development and progression involve genetic alterations leading to dysregulation of different cellular functions such as growth signaling, angiogenesis, and apoptosis but also to tissue invasion and metastases [1]. In urothelial carcinoma, at least 3 different pathways of tumor development have been described, each including different genetic changes [2]. Expression profiling with oligonucleotide microarray technology has recently identified a set of genes with prognostic relevance in patients who underwent radical cystectomy [3]. Over-expression and under-expression and/or alterations of the proteins encoded by these genes involved in the different cellular functions may also predict clinical outcome. In invasive bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy, protein alterations that have been suggested to influence independently outcome in multivariate analysis are TP53, RB1, and CDKN1A [4], [5]. However, there are also reports in which the prognostic values of TP53, RB1, and CDKN1A have not been confirmed [6], [7].

Many patients who undergo radical cystectomy will have tumor recurrence. Prognostic information obtained from pathologic tumor stage and lymph node status is insufficient to predict outcome and identify patients who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. The tissue microarray is a new high-throughput technique developed by Kononen et al. [8], enabling investigation of several tumor samples simultaneously with immunohistochemical methods. For example, tissue microarray methodology has been used to identify independent prognostic markers in breast cancer and colon cancer [9], [10]. It has been suggested that several molecular markers are needed to predict outcome in invasive bladder cancer [11], and combining markers that work at least partly through different pathways would be preferable [4]. To explore potential prognostic information in the expression of several proteins involved in different cellular functions, we performed tissue microarray based immunohistochemical evaluation of tumor samples in a consecutive cystectomy series.

Section snippets

Patients

Radical cystectomy was performed in 141 patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder at the Department of Urology, Lund University Hospital, between 1990 and 1997. Tumor tissue was available for immunohistochemical analyses in 133 patients. One pathologist (L.-M.L.) reviewed all histopathology according to the tumor-nodes-metastasis 2002 staging system. Lymphadenectomy was limited to the obturator fossa, and in 17 patients, lymphadenectomy was omitted according to the

Results

Median age at surgery was 66 years (range 26–82), and 111 of the 133 subjects (83%) were men. A total of 106 (80%) of the cystectomies were performed for muscle-invasive disease (clinical stage T2 or higher). Pathologic stage distribution in the sample was: pT0 8, pTa 2, pCIS 8, pt1 10, pT2 43, pT3 39, and pT4 23. Of the patients, 7 (5%) had grade 2 and the rest grade 3 disease. Of the 116 patients, 24 (21%) who underwent regional lymphadenectomy had lymph node positive disease. At the end of

Discussion

The aim of the present exploratory study was to verify previous findings obtained with a conventional immunohistochemical technique regarding TP53, RB1, and CDKN1A [4], [5] as prognostic factors, and identify other immunohistochemically altered protein expressions with possible additional prognostic value in conjunction with TP53, RB1, and CDKN1A. Genes selected for the analyses were chosen from different cellular processes, such as cell signaling (EGFR and ERBB2), angiogenesis (VEGFC and

Conclusions

The present study could not identify any prognostic factors using immunohistochemistry in conjunction with tissue microarray technology. Whether this negative finding is related to the group of patients or factors studied, or the methodology is unclear. However, the results suggest that tissue microarray based analysis of prognostic markers in invasive bladder cancer in the present setting is of limited clinical value.

References (44)

  • S.F. Shariat et al.

    p53, p21, pRB, and p16 expression predict clinical outcome in cystectomy with bladder cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • S.J. Chatterjee et al.

    Combined effects of p53, p21, and pRb expression in the progression of bladder transitional cell carcinoma

    J Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • A.K. Hemal et al.

    Prognostic significance of p53 nuclear overexpression in patients of muscle invasive urinary bladder carcinoma treated with cystectomy

    Urol Int

    (2003)
  • S. Jahnson et al.

    Tumor mapping of regional immunostaining for p21, p53, and mdm2 in locally advanced bladder carcinoma

    Cancer

    (2000)
  • J. Kononen et al.

    Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens

    Nat Med

    (1998)
  • S.P. Linke et al.

    A multimarker model to predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2006)
  • M.B. Resnick et al.

    Epidermal growth factor receptor, c-MET, beta-catenin, and p53 expression as prognostic indicators in stage II colon cancer: A tissue microarray study

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2004)
  • A.P. Mitra et al.

    Molecular staging of bladder cancer

    BJU Int

    (2005)
  • P. Blanchet et al.

    Prospective evaluation of Ki-67 labeling in predicting the recurrence and progression of superficial bladder transitional cell carcinoma

    Eur Urol

    (2001)
  • A. Clairotte et al.

    Expression of E-cadherin and alpha-, beta-, gamma-catenins in patients with bladder cancer: Identification of gamma-catenin as a new prognostic marker of neoplastic progression in T1 superficial urothelial tumors

    Am J Clin Pathol

    (2006)
  • O. David et al.

    Phospho-Akt overexpression in non-small cell lung cancer confers significant stage-independent survival disadvantage

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2004)
  • A.R. Panigrahi et al.

    The role of PTEN and its signaling pathways, including AKT, in breast cancer; an assessment of relationships with other prognostic factors and with outcome

    J Pathol

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    This work was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society, Maud and Birger Gustavsson Foundation.

    View full text