Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 22, Issues 21–22, 29 July 2004, Pages 2722-2729
Vaccine

Effect of TA-CIN (HPV 16 L2E6E7) booster immunisation in vulval intraepithelial neoplasia patients previously vaccinated with TA-HPV (vaccinia virus encoding HPV 16/18 E6E7)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.01.049Get rights and content

Abstract

Heterologous prime-boost vaccination schedules employing TA-HPV, a vaccinia virus encoding HPV 16/18 E6 and E7, in combination with TA-CIN, an HPV 16 L2E6E7 fusion protein, may offer advantages over the use of either agent alone for the immunotherapy of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16-associated vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN). In the present study, 10 women with HPV 16-positive high grade VIN, previously primed with TA-HPV, received three booster immunisations with TA-CIN. All but one demonstrated HPV 16-specific proliferative T-cell and/or serological responses following vaccination. Three patients additionally showed lesion shrinkage or symptom relief, but no direct correlation between clinical and immunological responses was seen.

Introduction

Vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is an uncommon precancerous condition affecting women from the third decade of life [1]. It causes unpleasant symptoms such as itch and pain, has an appreciable risk of progression to invasive disease and is often recalcitrant to conventional therapy [2]. In the past, many women have required repeated surgical or laser excision to affected areas of the vulva, with devastating functional and psychosexual consequences [3].

The discovery that VIN is commonly associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 infection [4], [5] has provided the opportunity for an immunotherapeutic approach to its treatment. The HPV 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins offer attractive targets for immunotherapy because they are exclusively expressed in virally infected and neoplastic, but not in normal, cells [6]. Numerous animal models have shown that the induction of E6- and/or E7-specific T-cells by vaccination can effectively control established tumours (reviewed in [7]), and several vaccine candidates are now being tested in early phase clinical trials. Two such vaccines are TA-HPV and TA-CIN, developed by Xenova Research. TA-HPV is a live recombinant vaccinia virus encoding modified HPV 16 and 18 E6 and E7 oncoproteins [8]. Phase I/II studies of this vaccine in patients with advanced cervical cancer [9], early stage cervical cancer [10] and high grade CIN (reviewed in [11]) have demonstrated both safety and immunogenicity. TA-CIN is a recombinant HPV 16 L2E6E7 fusion protein which has been shown to induce HPV 16-specific T-cell responses in a pre-clinical mouse model [12] and in a phase I trial of healthy volunteers [13].

We have previously reported a phase II trial of TA-HPV in 18 women with HPV 16-positive high grade VIN [14]. Twelve women showed clinical improvement, as defined by lesion shrinkage and/or symptom relief, following immunisation. Vaccine immunogenicity was established with increased HPV 16-specific T-cell responses in 13 of the 18 vaccinated women, as determined by γ-interferon ELISPOT and/or proliferation assays. Similar clinical and T-cell responses were reported in a separate trial by Baldwin et al. [15]. In general, the boosted HPV-specific immunity was only detectable transiently in the peripheral blood at 4–8 weeks following immunisation. This may be due to primed HPV-specific lymphocytes homing to the lesion. If long-term cure depends on sustained systemic anti-HPV immunity, however, a single vaccination may not be sufficient. While a second vaccination with TA-HPV did not confer any additional immunological benefit in women with early cervical cancer [10], preclinical studies have indicated that a prime-boost strategy of TA-HPV administered in combination with TA-CIN results in enhanced immunogenicity compared with the use of either agent alone [12].

In the present study, 10 women with HPV 16-positive high grade VIN received three booster vaccinations with TA-CIN following their priming immunisation with TA-HPV 7–15 months earlier. This is the first report of a prime-boost vaccination strategy used to treat HPV-associated neoplastic disease. The aim was to determine whether the use of TA-CIN in women previously primed with TA-HPV was associated with enhanced HPV-specific immunity and further clinical improvement.

Section snippets

Study protocol

Women were recruited from the Vulva Clinic at St Mary’s Hospital in Manchester, UK. The UK Medicines Control Agency and Central Manchester Local Research Ethics Committee approved the study and all patients gave written informed consent. Women who had been vaccinated with TA-HPV at least 24 weeks previously [14] were invited to take part in a TA-CIN extension study. Under this protocol, women whose last vulval biopsy had confirmed the presence of HPV 16 and/or high grade VIN were eligible to

Study population

Eleven patients were recruited into the TA-CIN extension study. The first vaccination with TA-CIN was on average 5 months (range 1–9) after completing the 6-month follow-up for the TA-HPV trial [14]. Thus the patients were vaccinated with TA-CIN on average 11 months (range 7–15) following their priming vaccination with TA-HPV. The study population included six women who made a partial clinical response defined as >50% shrinkage in lesion size (patients 3, 5, 11, 12, 14 and 16), three women who

Discussion

Several prophylactic and therapeutic immunotherapies are currently being evaluated for HPV-associated disease [21]. We have previously described clinical and immunological responses in high grade VIN patients vaccinated with TA-HPV, a vaccinia virus encoding modified HPV 16 and 18 oncoproteins [14]. While objective clinical responses were seen in eight of 18 patients, just one showed complete disease regression. Furthermore, the measured HPV-specific immune responses were detectable only

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Xenova Research, The Joseph Starkey Fellowship from Wigan Cancer Research Fund and Cancer Research UK. We would like to thank Godfrey Wilson and Rhona McVey for their histopathological expertise; Andrew Bailey and Gerald Corbett for analysing the HPV status of the vulval biopsies; and Christopher Boswell, Jennifer Dobson, John St. Clair Roberts and the TA-HPV/TA-CIN project team at Xenova Research Limited.

References (22)

  • O.M McNally et al.

    VIN 3: a clinicopathologic review

    Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer

    (2002)
  • Cited by (108)

    • Progress in the development of vaccines against human papillomavirus

      2022, Oncogenic Viruses: Volume 2: Medical Applications of Viral Oncology Research
    • Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: Classification, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management

      2020, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most vaccines induce specific immunity against HPV oncogenic proteins E6 and E7 [67]. Two studies have analyzed the effectiveness of a combination of two vaccines (TA-HPV and TA-CIN) in women with HPV 16–associated VIN [68,69]. Of the 39 patients treated, nine patients showed lesion shrinkage, 25 remained stable, and five experienced disease progression.

    • Epithelial boost enhances antigen expression by vaccinia virus for the generation of potent CD8+ T cell-mediated antitumor immunity following DNA priming vaccination

      2018, Virology
      Citation Excerpt :

      TA-HPV was first used in a 2006 clinical trial in eight patients with late stage cervical cancer (Borysiewicz et al., 1996). TA-HPV has since been frequently used alone or in a prime boost regimen to enhance immune responses of several heterologous vaccines, including TA-CIN (Davidson et al., 2004; Smyth et al., 2004) and pNGVL4a-Sig/E7(detox)/HSP70 (Maldonado et al., 2014). Both DNA vaccines and TA-HPV are often administered via intramuscular (IM) injection.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text