Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 24, Issue 18, 1 May 2006, Pages 3709-3718
Vaccine

Comparison of the antibody in lymphocyte supernatant (ALS) and ELISPOT assays for detection of mucosal immune responses to antigens of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in challenged and vaccinated volunteers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.022Get rights and content

Abstract

In the present study we compared the ELISPOT and antibody in lymphocyte supernatants (ALS) assays as surrogate measures of mucosal immunity. In separate studies, 20 inpatient volunteers received oral doses of 6 × 108 or 4 × 109 cfu of ETEC strain E24377A (LT+, ST+, CS1+, CS3+) and 20 subjects received 1 (n = 9) or 2 (n = 11) oral doses of the attenuated ETEC vaccine, PTL-003 expressing CFA/II (CS1+ and CS3+) (2 × 109 cfu/dose). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from all subjects were assayed for anti-colonization factor or toxin-specific IgA antibody responses using the ALS and ELISPOT procedures. ALS responses were measured using a standard ELISA, as well as by time-resolved fluorescence (TRF). Following challenge with E24377A, significant anti-CS3, CS1 and LT ALS responses were detected in the lymphocyte supernatants of 75–95% of the subjects. A similar proportion (75%) of subjects mounted an ALS response to CFA/II antigen after vaccination with the PTL-003 vaccine. Inter-assay comparisons between ALS and ELISPOT methods also revealed a high degree of correlation in both immunization groups. ALS sensitivity versus the ELISPOT assay for LT, CS3 and CS1-specific responses following challenge were 95%, 94% and 78%, respectively and 83% for the ALS response to CFA/II antigen after vaccination with PTL-003. Correlation coefficients for the LT and CS3 antigens were 0.94 (p < 0.001) and 0.82 (p < 0.001), respectively after challenge and 0.78 (p < 0.001) after vaccination. The association between ALS and ELISPOT for the CS1 antigen was however, significant only when ALS supernatants were tested by TRF (r = 0.91, p < 0.001). These results demonstrate the value and flexibility of the ALS assay as an alternative to ELISPOT for the measurement of mucosal immune responses to ETEC antigens, particularly when the complexities of ELISPOT may make it impractical to perform.

Introduction

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli is among the most common causes of diarrhea among infants and children in developing countries, and is also the primary etiologic agent of Traveler's diarrhea among international visitors to the developing world [1]. A vaccine to prevent ETEC diarrhea would be a great public health benefit in reducing morbidity and mortality among children in developing countries and would also help reduce lost work hours and vacation time among business and holiday travelers [1], [2].

Antigen-specific intestinal secretory IgA (sIgA) responses are considered to play an important role in recovery from infectious diarrhea and in mediating vaccine or infection-induced protection against subsequent disease [3]. Direct measurement of intestinal sIgA responses to pathogen- or vaccine-specific antigens by lavage, endoscopy or aspiration is not practical on a large scale and suffers from quality control issues resulting from proteolytic degradation that can occur in fecal samples. Simpler quantitative methods are needed to support enteric vaccine development efforts and address regulatory agency interest in methods for evaluation of mucosal immune responses that can be validated and correlate with development of protective immunity. Chang and Sack [4] and Qadri et al. [5] have recently presented encouraging evidence indicating that the ELISPOT and a new in vitro assay, the antibody secreted in lymphocyte supernatants (ALS assay), are comparable as surrogate measures of mucosal responses to Vibrio cholerae antigens following natural infection or vaccination. The ALS assay was initially employed by B. Forrest who demonstrated its utility in measuring LPS-specific IgA responses to attenuated S. typhi vaccines [6]. The ALS assay has also been used to assess the mucosal immunogenicity of live attenuated S. typhimurium strains expressing Helicobactor pylori urease [7], and to identify patients with active cases of tuberculosis [8]. These positive results suggest that the ALS assay may also be suitable for use as a surrogate measure of mucosal immunity to ETEC antigens in subjects infected with this enteric pathogen or immunized with vaccine candidates. However, the ELISPOT and ALS procedures have yet to be directly compared in this regard.

In this study we evaluated the ALS assay as a surrogate measure of mucosal immunity to ETEC antigens by characterizing the ALS response to the CS3 and CS1 coli surface antigens and LT toxin in subjects experimentally infected with ETEC strain E24377A in a controlled clinical setting and in subjects immunized with a new candidate oral, live attenuated ETEC vaccine designated PTL-003. The primary goal of this study was to compare the ALS and ELISPOT procedures in their ability to measure the frequency and magnitude of recent mucosal immune responses to ETEC infection or vaccine immunization. A second aim was to compare ELISA and time-resolved fluorescence (TRF) as detection methods for measuring antigen-specific IgA antibody levels in ALS supernatants. As part of this secondary evaluation, frozen ALS supernatants were shared between laboratories to determine the degree of inter-laboratory concordance between the two potential ALS assay methods and also to assess the reliability of the ALS assay as a predictor of mucosal immunization when quantified using two different technologies. The results of this extensive comparative analysis indicate that ALS is a sensitive indicator of local immune responses to ETEC toxins and colonization factor antigens and is comparable to the more commonly used ELISPOT procedure. The successful inter-laboratory comparison of ALS detection methods using cryopreserved supernatants also serves to further highlight the greater flexibility and reliability of this technique and its greater potential for validation compared to the ELISPOT assay.

Section snippets

Safety and immunogenicity trial of two live attenuated ETEC vaccines in adult volunteers

Two live attenuated prototype vaccines, designated PTL-002 and PTL-003 were prepared from ETEC strain E1392/75-2A, a spontaneous toxin negative mutant (both LT and ST negative), which expresses coli surface antigens CS1 and CS3 [9]. The specific genetic deletions, final characterization, and preliminary safety and immunogenicity profiles of these vaccine constructs has been reported elsewhere [9]. These vaccines were further evaluated for safety and immunogenicity in a randomized, double-blind

Summary of clinical outcomes and immunological responses in subjects challenged with ETEC strain E24377A or immunized with the PTL-002 or PTL-003 vaccine constructs

Both attenuated vaccine constructs were well tolerated by immunized subjects and both induced anti-CFA/II specific mucosal immune responses after vaccination (Bourgeois AL, McKenzie R, Engstrom F et al. Abstract E-71. 101st Annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Orlando, Fla, 20–24 May 2001). The incidences of general or gastrointestinal symptoms were not significantly different among recipients of either vaccine compared to placebo (Fisher's exact test for sparse outcomes,

Discussion

The present study is the first to compare the ALS and ELISPOT assays as detection methods for measuring mucosal immune responses to ETEC antigens among subjects challenged with a wild-type ETEC strain or orally immunized with a live attenuated candidate vaccine. The ALS assay has several advantages over the ELISPOT that might serve to make it a more practical assay for supporting ETEC vaccine development if it yields comparable results. Our results from the subjects infected with E24377A

Acknowledgements

This work was presented in part at the Vaccines for Enteric Diseases Conferences held in Tampere, Finland, September 2001 and in Montego Bay, Jamaica April 2004. The authors thank the GCRC, Osler 5 Research Ward staff, Lucy Gibson, Jennifer Kyle, and LaNisha Burke for their assistance in conducting this research and in preparing this manuscript. This work was supported in part by funds from Acambis Research, Ltd., Cambridge, UK, and by the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine General

References (28)

  • F. Qadri et al.

    Antigen-specific immunoglobulin A antibodies secreted from circulating B cells are an effective marker for recent local immune responses in patients with cholera: comparison to antibody-secreting cell responses and other immunological markers

    Infect Immun

    (2003)
  • B.D. Forrest

    Indirect measurement of intestinal immune responses to an orally administered attenuated bacterial vaccine

    Infect Immun

    (1992)
  • H. Angelakopoulos et al.

    Pilot study of phoP/phoQ-deleted Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium expressing Helicobacter pylori urease in adult volunteers

    Infect Immun

    (2000)
  • R. Raqib et al.

    Rapid diagnosis of active tuberculosis by detecting antibodies from lymphocyte secretions

    J Infect Dis

    (2003)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Booster vaccination with a fractional dose of an oral cholera vaccine induces comparable vaccine-specific antibody avidity as a full dose: A randomised clinical trial

      2020, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interestingly, the trend of lower magnitudes of response to fractional booster doses was more pronounced for serum antibody responses than ALS antibody responses. In the case of non-invasive enteric pathogens such as V. cholerae and ETEC, results from the ALS assay, which reflects the mucosal immune response [11,15–19], are more biologically relevant than serum antibodies, as vaccine-specific antibodies are required in the gut lumen to neutralise the bacteria and associated toxins. Nevertheless, the relative importance of antibody concentrations and antibody avidity for vaccine-induced protection against cholera is not known.

    • Evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of the oral inactivated multivalent enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli vaccine ETVAX in Bangladeshi adults in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase I trial using electrochemiluminescence and ELISA assays for immunogenicity analyses

      2019, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      After infection or vaccination in the intestinal mucosa, activated intestinal lymphocytes transiently migrate to the circulation before homing back to the mucosa. Therefore, ASCs present among peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are suitable surrogate markers of mucosal immunity [13,20–24], particularly if blood samples are collected at optimal time points after lymphocyte activation [16,18,25,26]. ASC responses can be analyzed using ELISPOT or by ALS, which is commonly based on ELISA techniques for detection of secreted antibodies in the culture medium, and results from the two assays correlate very well with each other [15,24,27,28].

    • Cholera immunity and development and use of oral cholera vaccines for disease control

      2019, Mucosal Vaccines: Innovation for Preventing Infectious Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text