Comparison of the antibody in lymphocyte supernatant (ALS) and ELISPOT assays for detection of mucosal immune responses to antigens of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in challenged and vaccinated volunteers
Introduction
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli is among the most common causes of diarrhea among infants and children in developing countries, and is also the primary etiologic agent of Traveler's diarrhea among international visitors to the developing world [1]. A vaccine to prevent ETEC diarrhea would be a great public health benefit in reducing morbidity and mortality among children in developing countries and would also help reduce lost work hours and vacation time among business and holiday travelers [1], [2].
Antigen-specific intestinal secretory IgA (sIgA) responses are considered to play an important role in recovery from infectious diarrhea and in mediating vaccine or infection-induced protection against subsequent disease [3]. Direct measurement of intestinal sIgA responses to pathogen- or vaccine-specific antigens by lavage, endoscopy or aspiration is not practical on a large scale and suffers from quality control issues resulting from proteolytic degradation that can occur in fecal samples. Simpler quantitative methods are needed to support enteric vaccine development efforts and address regulatory agency interest in methods for evaluation of mucosal immune responses that can be validated and correlate with development of protective immunity. Chang and Sack [4] and Qadri et al. [5] have recently presented encouraging evidence indicating that the ELISPOT and a new in vitro assay, the antibody secreted in lymphocyte supernatants (ALS assay), are comparable as surrogate measures of mucosal responses to Vibrio cholerae antigens following natural infection or vaccination. The ALS assay was initially employed by B. Forrest who demonstrated its utility in measuring LPS-specific IgA responses to attenuated S. typhi vaccines [6]. The ALS assay has also been used to assess the mucosal immunogenicity of live attenuated S. typhimurium strains expressing Helicobactor pylori urease [7], and to identify patients with active cases of tuberculosis [8]. These positive results suggest that the ALS assay may also be suitable for use as a surrogate measure of mucosal immunity to ETEC antigens in subjects infected with this enteric pathogen or immunized with vaccine candidates. However, the ELISPOT and ALS procedures have yet to be directly compared in this regard.
In this study we evaluated the ALS assay as a surrogate measure of mucosal immunity to ETEC antigens by characterizing the ALS response to the CS3 and CS1 coli surface antigens and LT toxin in subjects experimentally infected with ETEC strain E24377A in a controlled clinical setting and in subjects immunized with a new candidate oral, live attenuated ETEC vaccine designated PTL-003. The primary goal of this study was to compare the ALS and ELISPOT procedures in their ability to measure the frequency and magnitude of recent mucosal immune responses to ETEC infection or vaccine immunization. A second aim was to compare ELISA and time-resolved fluorescence (TRF) as detection methods for measuring antigen-specific IgA antibody levels in ALS supernatants. As part of this secondary evaluation, frozen ALS supernatants were shared between laboratories to determine the degree of inter-laboratory concordance between the two potential ALS assay methods and also to assess the reliability of the ALS assay as a predictor of mucosal immunization when quantified using two different technologies. The results of this extensive comparative analysis indicate that ALS is a sensitive indicator of local immune responses to ETEC toxins and colonization factor antigens and is comparable to the more commonly used ELISPOT procedure. The successful inter-laboratory comparison of ALS detection methods using cryopreserved supernatants also serves to further highlight the greater flexibility and reliability of this technique and its greater potential for validation compared to the ELISPOT assay.
Section snippets
Safety and immunogenicity trial of two live attenuated ETEC vaccines in adult volunteers
Two live attenuated prototype vaccines, designated PTL-002 and PTL-003 were prepared from ETEC strain E1392/75-2A, a spontaneous toxin negative mutant (both LT and ST negative), which expresses coli surface antigens CS1 and CS3 [9]. The specific genetic deletions, final characterization, and preliminary safety and immunogenicity profiles of these vaccine constructs has been reported elsewhere [9]. These vaccines were further evaluated for safety and immunogenicity in a randomized, double-blind
Summary of clinical outcomes and immunological responses in subjects challenged with ETEC strain E24377A or immunized with the PTL-002 or PTL-003 vaccine constructs
Both attenuated vaccine constructs were well tolerated by immunized subjects and both induced anti-CFA/II specific mucosal immune responses after vaccination (Bourgeois AL, McKenzie R, Engstrom F et al. Abstract E-71. 101st Annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Orlando, Fla, 20–24 May 2001). The incidences of general or gastrointestinal symptoms were not significantly different among recipients of either vaccine compared to placebo (Fisher's exact test for sparse outcomes,
Discussion
The present study is the first to compare the ALS and ELISPOT assays as detection methods for measuring mucosal immune responses to ETEC antigens among subjects challenged with a wild-type ETEC strain or orally immunized with a live attenuated candidate vaccine. The ALS assay has several advantages over the ELISPOT that might serve to make it a more practical assay for supporting ETEC vaccine development if it yields comparable results. Our results from the subjects infected with E24377A
Acknowledgements
This work was presented in part at the Vaccines for Enteric Diseases Conferences held in Tampere, Finland, September 2001 and in Montego Bay, Jamaica April 2004. The authors thank the GCRC, Osler 5 Research Ward staff, Lucy Gibson, Jennifer Kyle, and LaNisha Burke for their assistance in conducting this research and in preparing this manuscript. This work was supported in part by funds from Acambis Research, Ltd., Cambridge, UK, and by the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine General
References (28)
Epidemiology of diarrheal disease: implications for control by vaccines
Vaccine
(1993)- et al.
Mucosal immunity: implications for vaccine development
Immunobiol
(1992) - et al.
Enteral immunization and challenge of volunteers given enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli CFA/II encapsulated in biodegradable microspheres
Vaccine
(1994) - et al.
Identification and characterization of hydrophobic Escherichia coli virulence proteins by liquid chromatography—Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
Anal Biochem
(2002) - et al.
Europium-labelled streptavidin as a highly sensitive universal label. Indirect time-resolved immunofluorometry of FSH and TSH
J Immunol Methods
(1992) - et al.
A novel two-colour ELISPOT assay. I. Simultaneous detection of distinct types of antibody-secreting cells
J Immunol Methods
(1988) Antibody-secreting cells in the evaluation of the immunogenicity of an oral vaccine
Vaccine
(1990)- et al.
Safety and immunogenicity of an oral, inactivated enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli plus cholera toxin B subunit vaccine in Bangladeshi adults and children
Vaccine
(2000) - et al.
Vaccines against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infections. Part II. Live oral vaccines and subunit (purified fimbriae and toxin subunit) vaccines
- et al.
Development of a novel in vitro assay (ALS assay) for evaluation of vaccine-induced antibody secretion from circulating lymphocytes
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol
(2001)
Antigen-specific immunoglobulin A antibodies secreted from circulating B cells are an effective marker for recent local immune responses in patients with cholera: comparison to antibody-secreting cell responses and other immunological markers
Infect Immun
Indirect measurement of intestinal immune responses to an orally administered attenuated bacterial vaccine
Infect Immun
Pilot study of phoP/phoQ-deleted Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium expressing Helicobacter pylori urease in adult volunteers
Infect Immun
Rapid diagnosis of active tuberculosis by detecting antibodies from lymphocyte secretions
J Infect Dis
Cited by (34)
Booster vaccination with a fractional dose of an oral cholera vaccine induces comparable vaccine-specific antibody avidity as a full dose: A randomised clinical trial
2020, VaccineCitation Excerpt :Interestingly, the trend of lower magnitudes of response to fractional booster doses was more pronounced for serum antibody responses than ALS antibody responses. In the case of non-invasive enteric pathogens such as V. cholerae and ETEC, results from the ALS assay, which reflects the mucosal immune response [11,15–19], are more biologically relevant than serum antibodies, as vaccine-specific antibodies are required in the gut lumen to neutralise the bacteria and associated toxins. Nevertheless, the relative importance of antibody concentrations and antibody avidity for vaccine-induced protection against cholera is not known.
Evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of the oral inactivated multivalent enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli vaccine ETVAX in Bangladeshi adults in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase I trial using electrochemiluminescence and ELISA assays for immunogenicity analyses
2019, VaccineCitation Excerpt :After infection or vaccination in the intestinal mucosa, activated intestinal lymphocytes transiently migrate to the circulation before homing back to the mucosa. Therefore, ASCs present among peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are suitable surrogate markers of mucosal immunity [13,20–24], particularly if blood samples are collected at optimal time points after lymphocyte activation [16,18,25,26]. ASC responses can be analyzed using ELISPOT or by ALS, which is commonly based on ELISA techniques for detection of secreted antibodies in the culture medium, and results from the two assays correlate very well with each other [15,24,27,28].
Cholera immunity and development and use of oral cholera vaccines for disease control
2019, Mucosal Vaccines: Innovation for Preventing Infectious Diseases