Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 29, Issue 11, 3 March 2011, Pages 2120-2126
Vaccine

Pandemic H1N1 vaccine requires the use of an adjuvant to protect against challenge in naïve ferrets

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.125Get rights and content

Abstract

In the context of an A/H1N1 influenza pandemic situation, this study demonstrates that heterologous vaccination with an AS03-adjuvanted 2008/2009 seasonal trivalent and pandemic H5N1 monovalent split vaccine conferred partial protection in influenza-naïve ferrets after challenge with the influenza pandemic H1N1 A/The Netherlands/602/09 virus. Further, unlike saline control and non-adjuvanted vaccine, it was shown that immunization of naïve ferrets with an AS03-adjuvanted pandemic H1N1 A/California/7/09 influenza split vaccine induced increased antibody response and enhanced protection against the challenge strain, including significant reduction in viral shedding in the upper respiratory tract and reduced lung pathology post-challenge. These results show the need for vaccination with the adjuvanted vaccine to fully protect against viral replication and influenza disease in unprimed ferrets.

Introduction

An important hallmark of the recently emerged 2009 A/H1N1 pandemic influenza virus is that it causes disease in young people more often than it does in older individuals. Indeed, in contrast to seasonal influenza, a substantial proportion of the cases of severe illness and death have occurred among young people [1] who are generally devoid of cross-reactive antibody responses against 2009 A/H1N1, while 34% of people over 60 years exhibited cross-reactive seroprotection [2]. These observations suggest the need for a potent vaccine for the younger population in the context of the current 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic due to the lack of preexisting immunity against this virus.

Vaccination is the most effective intervention to reduce morbidity and mortality during an influenza pandemic provided that vaccines are rapidly available in sufficient quantities. Based on early experience with non-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccines in a population largely naïve to the H5N1 strain, two vaccinations with high haemagglutinin (HA) antigen doses (up to 90 μg HA) were shown to be required to elicit putatively protective antibody levels [3]. However, the necessity for such high dose of antigen would lead to vaccine shortage when facing a pandemic. Therefore, the use of adjuvants was advocated to increase immunogenicity, with the aim to allow antigen sparing but also promote cross-immunity against drifted strains. Antigen sparing and inter-clade cross-reactivity was demonstrated by using recombinant clade 1 H5N1 A/Vietnam/1194/2004 formulated with AS03A, an oil-in-water-based Adjuvant System containing α-tocopherol that stimulates antibody production [4], [5]. AS03-induced increased immunogenicity was also observed in a clinical trial involving H1N1 strain [6].

It is not ethically possible to study the efficacy of a pandemic vaccine in the target human population prior to the onset of the pandemic. Animal studies are thus required. In this regard, ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) are considered to be the best mammalian model to evaluate the efficacy of influenza vaccines for humans [7], [8]. In ferrets, the pandemic H1N1 A/The Netherlands/602/09 influenza virus is more pathogenic than seasonal influenza viruses and infects not only the upper airways (nasal passages) but also the more distal parts of the airways (bronchi and alveoli) [9], [10]. The severity of the pneumonia that the pandemic H1N1 causes approaches that caused by highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus, but the lethal dose of the pandemic H1N1 is higher compared to H5N1 [8], [10].

Currently, data obtained with 2009 A/H1N1 influenza vaccines suggested the importance of using an adjuvant and two vaccinations to induce adequate humoral responses in unprimed children [11], [12]. To investigate this hypothesis, the present study was designed to evaluate in naïve ferrets the efficacy of vaccination with a 2008/2009 seasonal trivalent split vaccine, an H5N1 pandemic split vaccine or the H1N1 A/California/7/09 split vaccine with or without AS03, against a challenge with the novel H1N1 A/The Netherlands/602/09 influenza virus.

Section snippets

Immunization with the seasonal trivalent split vaccine or H5N1 pandemic split vaccine

Eight groups of six ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) received intramuscularly one (day 21) or two vaccinations (days 0 and 21) with the seasonal trivalent split influenza vaccine (H1N1 A/Brisbane/59/07, H3N2 A/Uruguay/716/07 and B/Brisbane/3/07) containing 15, 7.5 or 3.75 μg HA/strain adjuvanted with AS03A (oil-in-water emulsion-based Adjuvant System containing 11.86 mg tocopherol) or AS03B (oil-in-water emulsion-based Adjuvant System containing 5.93 mg tocopherol) in the hind leg under ketamin (4–8

H1N1 challenge in ferrets immunized with adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted seasonal trivalent split vaccine or H5N1 pandemic split vaccine

We investigated a 2009 A/H1N1 challenge study in naïve ferrets that received one vaccination (15 μg HA/strain, group 3) or two vaccinations (15 μg HA/strain for groups 2 and 4, 7.5 μg HA/strain for the group 5 and 3.75 μg HA/strain for the group 6) with the 2008/2009 seasonal trivalent split influenza vaccine (H1N1 A/Brisbane/59/07, H3N2 A/Uruguay/716/07 and B/Brisbane/3/07) adjuvanted with AS03A (groups 2, 3 and 6) or AS03B (groups 4 and 5). One group of ferrets received two vaccinations with the

Discussion

The present study was designed to evaluate in naïve ferrets the protective efficacy against challenge with the novel H1N1 A/The Netherlands/602/09 influenza virus induced by one or two vaccinations with different doses of a 2008/2009 seasonal trivalent split vaccine (H1N1 A/Brisbane/59/07, H3N2 A/Uruguay/716/07 and B/Brisbane/3/07), an H5N1 pandemic split vaccine and finally an H1N1 A/California/7/09 split vaccine with or without AS03, an oil-in-water emulsion based Adjuvant System containing

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to C. Dubois, P. Festraets, V. Gobin, Ph. Lancelot, M.-C. Mortier, B. Bouzya, V. Francq, A. Van Beneden, R. Mascolo, M. Hamrouni (GSK Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) and W. van Aert, R. Boom, C. van Hagen, R. van Lavieren, and P. van Run (ViroClinics Biosciences BV and Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) for their very precious technical support. Finally, we would like to thank U. Krause (GSK Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) and P. Cadot (XpePharma

References (30)

  • I. Leroux-Roels et al.

    Broad Clade 2 cross-reactive immunity induced by an adjuvanted clade 1 rH5N1 pandemic influenza vaccine

    PLoS One

    (2008)
  • A.W. Hampson

    Ferrets and the challenges of H5N1 vaccine formulation

    J Infect Dis

    (2006)
  • B. Baras et al.

    Cross-protection against lethal H5N1 challenge in ferrets with an adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine

    PLoS One

    (2008)
  • V.J. Munster et al.

    Pathogenesis and transmission of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza virus in ferrets

    Science

    (2009)
  • J.M.A. van den Brand et al.

    Severity of pneumonia due to new H1N1 influenza virus in ferrets is intermediate between that due to seasonal H1N1 virus and highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus

    J Infect Dis

    (2010)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Intranasally administered Endocine™ formulated 2009 pandemic influenza H1N1 vaccine induces broad specific antibody responses and confers protection in ferrets

      2014, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nasal influenza vaccines composed of inactivated pH1N1/09 split or whole virus antigen mixed with Endocine™ adjuvant induced high antibody titers in influenza naïve ferrets and protection against homologous challenge. Nasal Endocine™ formulated inactivated pH1N1/09 influenza vaccines induced high levels of serum HI and VN antibodies, which were in the same order of magnitude as antibody levels found in influenza naïve ferrets intranasally immunized with monovalent H1N1/California/2009 live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIVs) [37–39] or in influenza naïve ferrets intramuscularly immunized with AS03 adjuvanted H1N1/California/2009 split vaccines [39]. The results in control ferrets parenterally immunized with non-adjuvanted seasonal TIV were similar to those seen in naïve controls (i.n. saline).

    • Consecutive CT in vivo lung imaging as quantitative parameter of influenza vaccine efficacy in the ferret model

      2012, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Usually, more severely affected and inflamed lungs with increased amounts of fluid are heavier compared to normal or less affected lungs. This translates within the ferret model in influenza research to RLWs ≤ 1.0 associated with non- to minimally affected lungs and RLWs > 1.0 associated with severe pulmonary inflammation with oedema [12,19,20]. In conclusion, the implementation of consecutive CT imaging enables repeated in vivo measurements of lung aeration as parameter to evaluate vaccine efficacy in preclinical protocols.

    • Control of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus infection of ferret lungs by non-adjuvant-containing pandemic and seasonal vaccines

      2012, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Also consistent is the finding that immunisation with non-adjuvanted pandemic H1N1 2009-based split virus preparations does not prevent nasal shedding. Other groups have shown that the use of an adjuvant is critical for protection of the nose [8–10] but these also show no protection of the lung without an adjuvant [8,9]. Nevertheless, here we have shown that, although the non-adjuvanted pMIV vaccine did not have an impact on viral shedding, it provided significant protection of the lung, a site that was highly relevant to clinical severity in a cohort of humans for whom infection proved to be life-threatening; benefit also extended to the oropharynx.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text