Elsevier

Gynecologic Oncology

Volume 103, Issue 2, November 2006, Pages 512-517
Gynecologic Oncology

Preoperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor as a prognostic parameter in ovarian cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.058Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective.

Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels have been shown to be associated with an adverse outcome in patients with ovarian cancer. We studied the clinical value of serum VEGF as an independent prognostic parameter.

Methods.

In the present study, we ascertained preoperative serum VEGF in a series of 314 patients with ovarian cancer: 45 new cases and 269 from four previously published studies. Serum VEGF was evaluated prior to primary surgery, results were correlated with clinical data.

Results.

Median serum VEGF was 407 (238–746) pg/mL. In a univariate Kaplan–Meier analysis, FIGO stage, residual tumor mass, tumor grade, patients' age, serum CA 125, and preoperative serum VEGF were associated with overall survival. In a multivariate Cox regression model, higher FIGO stage, presence of residual tumor mass after primary surgery, and higher serum VEGF were independently associated with a shortened overall survival. Planned subgroup analysis was performed for patients with ovarian cancer FIGO stage I. In a multivariate Cox regression model, higher tumor grade and higher serum VEGF were the only independent prognosticators for overall survival. Patients with FIGO stage I ovarian cancer and a serum VEGF ≥ 380 pg/mL had an 8-fold increased risk for experiencing cancer-related death.

Conclusion.

Serum VEGF is an independent prognostic parameter in patients with all stages of ovarian cancer.

Introduction

Tumor stage and residual tumor mass at primary cytoreductive surgery have been shown to most reliably predict outcome in patients with ovarian cancer [1]. Clinical decision making with respect to adjuvant therapy is largely based on FIGO stage and tumor grade, especially in early stage disease. Recently, the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage ovarian cancer has been questioned [2]. Therefore, the need for additional prognostic parameters seems obvious. In contrast to other malignancies [3], [4], few experimental prognostic parameters have proven any clinical value in ovarian cancer.

Angiogenesis has been established as a basic feature of tumor development, growth, and spread beyond regional borders [5], [6]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which can be seen as the most prominent pro-angiogenic molecule, has been shown to parallel selective steps of tumor growth and the development of metastases [7], [8]. VEGF is a dimeric glycoprotein with four splice variants consisting of 121, 165, 189, and 206 amino acid residues, expressing almost identical biologic activities by binding to specific Class III receptor tyrosine kinases, that is, flt-1 and KDR [9].

Experimental in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that VEGF is crucially involved in various steps of ovarian carcinogenesis [10], [11], [12]. Recently, immunohistochemically detected VEGF was shown to be associated with a dismal prognosis of ovarian cancer [13], [14]. With respect to serum VEGF in ovarian cancer, a number of studies have been published to date in the English literature. Seven of those studies also reported on the prognostic impact of serum VEGF [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. As the number of patients included in these studies were relatively low, the clinical value of preoperative serum VEGF was not adequately assessed. Therefore, we contacted all corresponding authors, four of which responded and provided the original data of their studies. In addition, we analyzed 45 new cases of ovarian cancer of our own institution adding up to a total of 314 cases.

Based on the promising previously published data and the need to predict prognosis of affected patients more precisely in order to tailor adjuvant therapy, we evaluated the clinical value of serum VEGF as a prognostic parameter in a large series of patients with ovarian cancer. Specifically, we also sought to establish the prognostic impact of serum VEGF in early stage disease [22].

Section snippets

Materials and methods

A total of 314 patients with ovarian cancer were included in the present study. VEGF serum levels were evaluated in 45 new cases. Serum VEGF was evaluated prior to primary surgery in all patients. The re-analysis of previously published data comprised 65 [21], 101 [17], 45 [20], and 55 [19] cases. Patients were treated between 1998–2003 (new cases), 1990–1995 [21], 1995–2000 [17], 1990–1997 [20], and 1992–1998 [19]. Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were included into the present study;

Results

Mean (SD) age at the time of diagnosis of ovarian cancer was 59.9 (14.1) years. FIGO stage distribution was as follows: FIGO I (n  =  56), FIGO II (n  =  27), FIGO III (n  =  177), and FIGO IV (n =  46). FIGO stage was unknown in 8 cases. Histologically, 166 tumors were graded as serous adenocarcinomas, 41 as mucinous adenocarcinomas, 39 as endometrioid adenocarcinomas, 9 as clear-cell carcinomas, 15 as undifferentiated carcinomas, and 19 as other histological types of ovarian cancer. Histological types

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, we present the largest series to date with respect to the prognostic impact of any serum marker in ovarian cancer patients. Besides the clinically established prognosticators FIGO stage and residual tumor mass, elevated serum VEGF could serve as independent adverse prognostic parameter for patients with all stages of ovarian cancer. Of note, within the subgroup of early stage ovarian cancer, that is, FIGO stage I, serum VEGF was also independently associated with

References (36)

  • A. Volpi et al.

    HER-2 expression and cell proliferation: prognostic markers in patients with node-negative breast cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • J. Folkman

    Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid, and other disease

    Nat Med

    (1995)
  • E.J. Battegay

    Angiogenesis: mechanistic insights, neovascular diseases, and therapeutic prospects

    J Mol Med

    (1995)
  • P. Salven et al.

    Serum vascular endothelial growth factor is often elevated in disseminated cancer

    Clin Cancer Res

    (1997)
  • P. Paley et al.

    Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in early stage ovarian carcinoma

    Cancer

    (1997)
  • G. Neufeld et al.

    Similarities and differences between the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) splice variants

    Cancer Metastasis Rev

    (1996)
  • P. Borgstrom et al.

    Complete inhibition of angiogenesis and growth of microtumors by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor neutralizing antibody: novel concepts of angiostatic therapy from intravital videomicroscopy

    Cancer Res

    (1996)
  • J. Mu et al.

    Inhibition of growth and metastasis of ovarian carcinoma by administering a drug capable of interfering with vascular endothelial growth factor activity

    Jpn J Cancer Res

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text