Preoperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor as a prognostic parameter in ovarian cancer
Introduction
Tumor stage and residual tumor mass at primary cytoreductive surgery have been shown to most reliably predict outcome in patients with ovarian cancer [1]. Clinical decision making with respect to adjuvant therapy is largely based on FIGO stage and tumor grade, especially in early stage disease. Recently, the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage ovarian cancer has been questioned [2]. Therefore, the need for additional prognostic parameters seems obvious. In contrast to other malignancies [3], [4], few experimental prognostic parameters have proven any clinical value in ovarian cancer.
Angiogenesis has been established as a basic feature of tumor development, growth, and spread beyond regional borders [5], [6]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which can be seen as the most prominent pro-angiogenic molecule, has been shown to parallel selective steps of tumor growth and the development of metastases [7], [8]. VEGF is a dimeric glycoprotein with four splice variants consisting of 121, 165, 189, and 206 amino acid residues, expressing almost identical biologic activities by binding to specific Class III receptor tyrosine kinases, that is, flt-1 and KDR [9].
Experimental in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that VEGF is crucially involved in various steps of ovarian carcinogenesis [10], [11], [12]. Recently, immunohistochemically detected VEGF was shown to be associated with a dismal prognosis of ovarian cancer [13], [14]. With respect to serum VEGF in ovarian cancer, a number of studies have been published to date in the English literature. Seven of those studies also reported on the prognostic impact of serum VEGF [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. As the number of patients included in these studies were relatively low, the clinical value of preoperative serum VEGF was not adequately assessed. Therefore, we contacted all corresponding authors, four of which responded and provided the original data of their studies. In addition, we analyzed 45 new cases of ovarian cancer of our own institution adding up to a total of 314 cases.
Based on the promising previously published data and the need to predict prognosis of affected patients more precisely in order to tailor adjuvant therapy, we evaluated the clinical value of serum VEGF as a prognostic parameter in a large series of patients with ovarian cancer. Specifically, we also sought to establish the prognostic impact of serum VEGF in early stage disease [22].
Section snippets
Materials and methods
A total of 314 patients with ovarian cancer were included in the present study. VEGF serum levels were evaluated in 45 new cases. Serum VEGF was evaluated prior to primary surgery in all patients. The re-analysis of previously published data comprised 65 [21], 101 [17], 45 [20], and 55 [19] cases. Patients were treated between 1998–2003 (new cases), 1990–1995 [21], 1995–2000 [17], 1990–1997 [20], and 1992–1998 [19]. Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were included into the present study;
Results
Mean (SD) age at the time of diagnosis of ovarian cancer was 59.9 (14.1) years. FIGO stage distribution was as follows: FIGO I (n = 56), FIGO II (n = 27), FIGO III (n = 177), and FIGO IV (n = 46). FIGO stage was unknown in 8 cases. Histologically, 166 tumors were graded as serous adenocarcinomas, 41 as mucinous adenocarcinomas, 39 as endometrioid adenocarcinomas, 9 as clear-cell carcinomas, 15 as undifferentiated carcinomas, and 19 as other histological types of ovarian cancer. Histological types
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, we present the largest series to date with respect to the prognostic impact of any serum marker in ovarian cancer patients. Besides the clinically established prognosticators FIGO stage and residual tumor mass, elevated serum VEGF could serve as independent adverse prognostic parameter for patients with all stages of ovarian cancer. Of note, within the subgroup of early stage ovarian cancer, that is, FIGO stage I, serum VEGF was also independently associated with
References (36)
- et al.
Serum vascular endothelial growth factor in epithelial ovarian neoplasms: correlation with patient survival
Gynecol Oncol
(1999) - et al.
Vascular endothelial growth factor serum concentrations in ovarian cancer
Obstet Gynecol
(1998) - et al.
Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma
Lancet
(2001) - et al.
A high pretreatment serum vascular endothelial growth factor concentration is associated with poor outcome in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Blood
(1997) - et al.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primarily unresectable, advanced-stage ovarian cancer
Gynecol Oncol
(2003) - et al.
Long-term survival with consolidation intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer with pathological complete remission
Gynecol Oncol
(2003) - et al.
Raloxifene therapy in postmenopausal women is associated with a significant reduction in the concentration of serum vascular endothelial growth factor
Fertil Steril
(2004) Prognostic factors in ovarian cancer
Semin Oncol
(1998)- et al.
International collaborative ovarian Neoplasm trial 1 and adjuvant ChemoTherapy in ovarian neoplasm trial: two parallel randomized phase III trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage ovarian carcinoma
J Natl Cancer Inst
(2003) - et al.
Biomarker changes during neoadjuvant anastrozole, tamoxifen, or the combination: influence of hormonal status and HER-2 in breast cancer-a study from the IMPACT trialists
J Clin Oncol
(2005)