Invited critical review
Circulating markers of endothelial function in cardiovascular disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2005.12.030Get rights and content

Abstract

Endothelial dysfunction is a key event in cardiovascular disease. Measurement of endothelial dysfunction in vivo presents a major challenge, but has important implications since it may identify the clinical need for therapeutic intervention, specifically in primary prevention. Several biological markers have been used as indicators of endothelial dysfunction. The soluble adhesion molecules sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1 lack specificity and are increased in inflammatory processes. Both markers are increased in coronary artery disease. sICAM-1 level predicts the risk for cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus in healthy individuals. sE-selectin is specific for the endothelium and is increased in coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus. sE-selectin is also associated with diabetic risk. The endothelium-specific marker, soluble thrombomodulin, is associated with severity of coronary artery disease, stroke or peripheral occlusive arterial disease and is not increased in healthy or asymptomatic subjects. Interestingly, thrombomodulin decreases during treatment of hypercholesterolemia or hyperhomocysteinemia. In contrast, von Willebrand factor is the best endothelial biomarker and predicts risk for ischemic heart disease or stroke.

Introduction

Endothelial function plays a central role in vascular homeostasis. The endothelial cell itself plays a key role in vascular diseases related to atherosclerosis. It is therefore useful to measure biological markers of vascular endothelial function in vivo because such markers might provide insight into the evolution and prognosis of vascular diseases.

The endothelium is a cell layer that regulates the exchange of water and small molecules as well as vasomotor tone, coagulation and fibrinolysis [1], [2]. Under physiological conditions, endothelial cells release a lot of molecules including nitric oxide (NO), prostacyclin (PGI2), EDHF (endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor), thrombomodulin and tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA). These diverse factors facilitate vasodilation, fibrinolysis and inhibit platelet aggregation and coagulation [1], [2]. Endothelial dysfunction can be characterized as a change in normal endothelial phenotype, i.e., vasorelaxant, anticoagulant, antiplatelet and profibrinolytic, to one that is vasoconstrictive, procoagulant, platelet-activating and antifibrinolytic. Under these conditions, endothelial cells release lower levels of all the aforementioned molecules as well as increased levels of endothelin-1, angiotensin II, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and von Willebrand factor [3], [4]. Normally, tissue factor is not present on the endothelial cell surface. During endothelial dysfunction, however, tissue factor becomes expressed as thrombin production is activated through the binding of factorVa/factorXa on surface of the endothelial cell [1], [2]. Upon activation by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) or interleukin-6 (IL-6), the endothelial expression of adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin increases, thus facilitating the migration of inflammatory cells and monocytes to the sub-endothelium.

Endothelial dysfunction is now considered as a key factor in atherosclerosis-related diseases and is present at all stages of atherosclerosis. The formation of plaques is characterized by the accumulation of inflammatory cells and oxidized low density lipoproteins (oxLDL) that reduce the intracellular NO and activate endothelial cells [5]. When activated, endothelial cells express increased amounts of adhesion molecules such as VCAM-1 and ICAM-1. These, in turn, stimulate monocyte adherence and increased levels of selectins that promote rolling of monocytes to the endothelial surface [1], [2]. The presence of high numbers of these inflammatory cells makes plaques more vulnerable to rupture and leads to myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndromes. Because endothelial dysfunction has been clinically demonstrated in coronary arteries of symptomatic patients [4], [6], [7], [8], specific and measurable markers of endothelial dysfunction in vivo are clearly needed. In order to accomplish this goal, two approaches have been proposed. One approach is to physically assess vasodilation in response to a stimulus [9]. This technique reflects the ability of the endothelium to secrete NO. The second approach is to measure biological markers. Candidate markers include circulating adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E-selectin), molecules that increase during endothelial damage (von Willebrand factor, soluble thrombomodulin) circulating endothelial cells) [10], [11] (Fig. 1). Such approaches are valid as long as endothelial dysfunction is considered systemic and not only a local phenomenon. This approach has been substantiated by studies that have correlated coronary vasomotor response to acetylcholine during catheterization and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) [12], [13]. Another issue is the measurement of markers that have restricted expression to endothelial cells including E-selectin, von Willebrand factor and soluble thrombomodulin [3], [14], [15].

A correlation has been demonstrated between FMD, which reflects the ability of the endothelium to release NO, and the level of some biological markers of endothelial damage such as von Willebrand factor [16], [17]. This relationship is indicative of a global endothelium dysfunction including impaired vasorelaxation and endothelial activation and damage. Measuring endothelial function in vivo is potentially useful for evaluating the severity and prognosis of vascular disease, assessing the risk of vascular disease in asymptomatic patients, and for measuring drug efficacy. This review focuses on the biological markers of endothelial dysfunction and their potential usefulness in the setting of cardiovascular diseases. A search was conducted in the Pubmed Medline database with the following key-words (MeSh): [vascular diseases] AND [(endothelial cell) OR (von Willebrand factor) OR E-selectin OR (intercellular adhesion molecule-1) OR (vascular cell adhesion molecule-1)].

Section snippets

von Willebrand factor

von Willebrand factor (vWF) is an endothelial ligand for platelet glycoproteins and is endothelium-specific. vWF plays a vital role in mediating platelet adhesion to damaged arterial walls [18]. When endothelial cells are injured, vWF is released from endothelial Weibel–Palade bodies. vWF, considered a gold standard in the measurement of endothelial damage, is increased in cardiovascular diseases [19]. Plasma vWF can be measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The concentration of

Conclusion

Several approaches can be used to measure endothelial function, a major player in vascular diseases. Flow-mediated dilation measured by ultrasound reflects the endothelial production of NO, but is difficult to standardize and use in clinical practice. Several biological markers reflect activation of the endothelium, either specifically (sE-selectin) or non-specifically (sVCAM-1, sICAM-1). sTM and vWF are potentially better markers because they reflect endothelial damage. Other markers such as

References (211)

  • J. Constans et al.

    Endothelial dysfunction during acute methionine load in hyperhomocysteinaemic patients

    Atherosclerosis

    (1999)
  • J. Constans et al.

    Soluble thrombomodulin in hypercholesterolaemic patients

    Lancet

    (2000)
  • J.S. Sidhu et al.

    Effects of rosiglitazone on endothelial function in men with coronary artery disease without diabetes mellitus

    Am J Cardiol

    (2004)
  • J.S. Sidhu et al.

    The effects of rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist, on markers of endothelial cell activation, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels in non-diabetic coronary artery disease patients

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2003)
  • S.N. Doshi et al.

    Short-term high-dose folic acid does not alter markers of endothelial cell damage in patients with coronary heart disease

    Int J Cardiol

    (2004)
  • M. Woodward et al.

    A randomized comparison of the effects of aspirin and clopidogrel on thrombotic risk factors and C-reactive protein following myocardial infarction: the CADET trial

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2004)
  • A.K. Ohlin et al.

    Genetic variation in the human thrombomodulin promoter locus and prognosis after acute coronary syndrome

    Thromb Res

    (2004)
  • V. Salomaa et al.

    Soluble thrombomodulin as a predictor of incident coronary heart disease and symptomless carotid artery atherosclerosis in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: a case–cohort study

    Lancet

    (1999)
  • V. Salomaa et al.

    Cross-sectional association of soluble thrombomodulin with mild peripheral artery disease; the ARIC study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities

    Atherosclerosis

    (2001)
  • M. Seigneur et al.

    Levels of plasma thrombomodulin are increased in atheromatous arterial disease

    Thromb Res

    (1993)
  • A.D. Blann et al.

    Relationship between endothelial cell markers and arterial stenosis in peripheral and carotid artery disease

    Thromb Res

    (2000)
  • D.A. Tsakiris et al.

    Circulating cell adhesion molecules and endothelial markers before and after transluminal angioplasty in peripheral arterial occlusive disease

    Atherosclerosis

    (1999)
  • A.M. Kas-Deelen et al.

    Acute rejection before cytomegalovirus infection enhances von Willebrand factor and soluble VCAM-1 in blood

    Kidney Int

    (2000)
  • M. Mutin et al.

    Direct evidence of endothelial injury in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina by demonstration of circulating endothelial cells

    Blood

    (1999)
  • G.S. Kansas

    Selectins and their ligands: current concepts and controversies

    Blood

    (1996)
  • R. Pigott et al.

    Soluble forms of E-selectin, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 are present in the supernatants of cytokine activated cultured endothelial cells

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (1992)
  • N.T. Mulvihill et al.

    Evidence of prolonged inflammation in unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2000)
  • H. Suefuji et al.

    Increased plasma level of soluble E-selectin in acute myocardial infarction

    Am Heart J

    (2000)
  • N.K. Ghaisas et al.

    Elevated levels of circulating soluble adhesion molecules in peripheral blood of patients with unstable angina

    Am J Cardiol

    (1997)
  • E. Atalar et al.

    Increased plasma levels of soluble selectins in patients with unstable angina

    Int J Cardiol

    (2001)
  • K.G. Shyu et al.

    Circulating intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and E-selectin in patients with acute coronary syndrome

    Chest

    (1996)
  • K. Mizia-Stec et al.

    Serum levels of selected adhesion molecules in patients with coronary artery disease

    Int J Cardiol

    (2002)
  • Y.H. Li et al.

    Elevation of soluble adhesion molecules is associated with the severity of myocardial damage in acute myocardial infarction

    Am J Cardiol

    (1997)
  • A.N. Tenaglia et al.

    Levels of expression of P-selectin, E-selectin, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in coronary atherectomy specimens from patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris

    Am J Cardiol

    (1997)
  • I.B. Menown et al.

    Prediction of recurrent events by D-dimer and inflammatory markers in patients with normal cardiac troponin I (PREDICT) study

    Am Heart J

    (2003)
  • C. Michiels

    Endothelial cell functions

    J Cell Physiol

    (2003)
  • A.D. Blann et al.

    A reliable marker of endothelial cell dysfunction: does it exist?

    Br J Haematol

    (1995)
  • P.E. Szmitko et al.

    New markers of inflammation and endothelial cell activation: Part I

    Circulation

    (2003)
  • M.A. Gonzalez et al.

    Endothelial function, inflammation, and prognosis in cardiovascular disease

    Am J Med

    (2003)
  • P.O. Bonetti et al.

    Endothelial dysfunction: a marker of atherosclerotic risk

    Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol

    (2003)
  • H. Ishii et al.

    Soluble thrombomodulin antigen in conditioned medium is increased by damage of endothelial cells

    Thromb Haemost

    (1991)
  • P. Libby et al.

    Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and smooth muscle cell activation during atherogenesis

    J Clin Invest

    (1993)
  • O. Printseva et al.

    Various cell types in human atherosclerotic lesions express ICAM-1. Further immunocytochemical and immunochemical studies employing monoclonal antibody 10F3

    Am J Pathol

    (1992)
  • A.Y. Chong et al.

    Endothelial dysfunction and damage in congestive heart failure: relation of flow-mediated dilation to circulating endothelial cells, plasma indexes of endothelial damage, and brain natriuretic peptide

    Circulation

    (2004)
  • A.J. Vlot et al.

    Factor VIII and von Willebrand factor

    Thromb Haemost

    (1998)
  • G.Y. Lip et al.

    von Willebrand factor: a marker of endothelial dysfunction in vascular disorders?

    Cardiovasc Res

    (1997)
  • M.G. Conlan et al.

    Associations of factor VIII and von Willebrand factor with age, race, sex, and risk factors for atherosclerosis. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

    Thromb Haemost

    (1993)
  • A. Rumley et al.

    Factor VIII, von Willebrand factor and the risk of major ischaemic heart disease in the Caerphilly Heart study

    Br J Haematol

    (1999)
  • A. Jager et al.

    von Willebrand factor, C-reactive protein, and 5-year mortality in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects: the Hoorn study

    Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol

    (1999)
  • T.W. Meade et al.

    Factor VIII, ABO blood group and the incidence of ischaemic heart disease

    Br J Haematol

    (1994)
  • Cited by (220)

    • Studies of the retinal microcirculation using human donor eyes and high-resolution clinical imaging: Insights gained to guide future research in diabetic retinopathy

      2023, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The disadvantages of these tests for endothelia dysfunction is the occurrence of false-positive and false-negative results as well as the limited specificity and sensitivity of positive findings. Such tests are invasive, costly and characterised by a delay between when the test is performed and when the results are returned (Constans and Conri, 2006; Leite et al., 2020). The eye is one of the few systems in the human body where the capillary circulation can be directly visualised using in vivo state-of-the-art clinical imaging.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text