Genomic patterns of DNA methylation: targets and function of an epigenetic mark

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2007.04.011Get rights and content

Methylation of cytosines can mediate epigenetic gene silencing and is the only known DNA modification in eukaryotes. Recent efforts to map DNA methylation across mammalian genomes revealed limited DNA methylation at regulatory regions but widespread methylation in intergenic regions and repeats. This is consistent with the idea that hypermethylation is the default epigenetic state and serves in maintaining genome integrity. DNA methylation patterns at regulatory regions are generally stable, but a minor subset of regulatory regions show variable DNA methylation between cell types, suggesting an additional dynamic component. Such promoter de novo methylation might be involved in the maintenance rather than the initiation of silencing of defined genes during development. How frequently such dynamic methylation occurs, its biological relevance and the pathways involved deserve investigation.

Introduction

In prokaryotes, DNA can be methylated on both cytosines and adenines and this methylation is involved in various processes, including DNA repair and defense against foreign DNA [1]. Eukaryotes show methylation almost exclusively at cytosines: in mammals it occurs only in the context of CpG dinucleotides (CpGs), while in fungi (e.g. Neurospora crassa) and plants (e.g. Arabidopsis thaliana) methylation is seen in various symmetrical and asymmetrical sequence contexts (reviewed in [2]). However, cytosine methylation does not occur in all eukaryotes, as it is absent in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in many invertebrates, like the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Regarding insects, low levels of cytosine methylation have been reported in Drosophila melanogaster and substantial methylation has been found in the honey bee Apis mellifera [3].

Four DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) sharing a conserved DNMT domain have been identified in mammals. The founding member, DNMT1, maintains DNA methylation during replication by copying the DNA methylation of the old DNA strand onto the newly synthesized strand [4]. DNMT3a and DNMT3b are responsible for de novo methylation, as they are able to target unmethylated CpG sites [5]. They also cooperate with DNMT1 to propagate methylation patterns during cell division [6]. DNMT2 has only weak DNA methyltransferase activity in vitro and has recently been shown to efficiently methylate a tRNA [7].

DNA methylation is generally associated with a repressed chromatin state and inhibition of promoter activity. Two models of repression have been proposed: first, cytosine methylation can prevent the binding of some transcription factors, and second, DNA methylation can affect chromatin states indirectly through the recruitment of methyl-CpG-binding proteins (MBPs) [8]. DNA methylation is essential for mammalian development, as shown by the lethality of various DNMT deficiencies in mice [5, 9]. DNA-methylation-mediated repression has been directly implicated in X-chromosome inactivation and genomic imprinting (see review by Edwards and Ferguson-Smith in this issue); however, other functions of DNA methylation in developmentally regulated gene expression remain less definite.

Mammalian genomes are globally depleted for CpGs, except at short DNA stretches called CpG islands, which are frequently associated with gene promoters. This unequal distribution of CpGs needs to be considered when interpreting global maps of DNA methylation, because the amount of methylated cytosines at a given region depends both on the degree of methylation and on the density of CpGs.

Here we review how recent advances in determining the sites of DNA methylation on a genome-wide scale have given new insights into the biological function of DNA methylation in maintaining genome integrity and cell identity. Due to space limitations we will not focus on aberrant DNA methylation in cancer, for which we refer the reader to recent summary articles [10, 11].

Section snippets

Going global: technologies for genome-wide mapping of DNA methylation

Until recently the distribution of DNA methylation in eukaryotic genomes (the ‘methylome’) remained poorly characterized, despite its utility for defining global rules that govern the distribution of DNA methylation and identifying potential exceptions. Within recent years, however, approaches have been developed to map DNA methylation genome-wide. Some of these are variations of classical approaches using methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes [12, 13, 14] or digestion with the

Genomic distribution of DNA methylation

It has long been speculated that most coding regions in mammalian genomes show a high degree of DNA methylation, and this has now been confirmed across the genome by independent studies. Hybridization of methylated DNA to a BAC microarray representing the entire human genome showed that DNA methylation of unique sequences is abundant in genic regions [18]. This is in agreement with earlier studies of selected genes showing that exons are methylated in both human and mouse [26]. Recent

DNA methylation and genome integrity

The fact that most DNA methylation in mammals is found outside regulatory regions suggests a role for DNA methylation in the global maintenance of the genome, and several functional models have been proposed.

DNA methylation and maintenance of cell identity

Developmental restriction by repression of genes represents a key paradigm in epigenetics. On the basis of its potential to silence promoters, DNA methylation has been hypothesized to play an important role in cell-type-specific gene expression. Rare examples of tissue-specific promoter DNA methylation exist [12, 51], while other studies on individual genes failed to establish a strong connection between changes in expression and dynamic methylation [52]. Indeed, ∼60% of genes in mammalian

Reprogramming of DNA methylation

How is DNA methylation specifically targeted to a subset of promoters? As most of the genome is methylated, one could envision that de novo methylation of selected CpG island promoters may entail loss of protection against a default program yielding DNA methylation (Figure 3a). Currently we know little about what protects CpG islands from DNA methylation, and understanding this phenomenon is likely to provide a key to understanding the mechanisms of dynamic promoter methylation. In most studied

Variation and heritability of DNA methylation patterns

The possibility that DNA methylation patterns are variable between individuals and that epigenotypes could contribute to phenotypic diversity and disease susceptibility has drawn considerable attention in recent years (Figure 4). Pilot studies aimed at estimating variability in DNA methylation patterns between individuals gave quite different results. Bisulfite sequencing of 2524 amplicons revealed very little variation with age and sex [23••], whereas another study reported a high frequency of

Conclusions

Recent advances in epigenomic approaches allow mapping of the methylation state of the genome with high accuracy, enabling the testing of models for the function of this DNA modification. Emerging evidence suggests that hypermethylation is the default state of mammalian genomes, but that dynamic DNA methylation of regulatory regions can occur during development. Moreover, epigenetic differences might also exist between individuals. Studying the extent of both these phenomena and their

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We thank Antoine Peters, Eric Selker and members of the laboratory for helpful comments on the manuscript. We apologize to colleagues whose work could not be cited due to space limitation. Research in the laboratory of Dirk Schübeler is supported by the Novartis Research Foundation, the European Network Of Excellence ‘The Epigenome’ (LSHG-CT-2004-503433) and the EMBO Young Investigator program.

References (69)

  • A. Reisenauer et al.

    Bacterial DNA methylation: a cell cycle regulator?

    J Bacteriol

    (1999)
  • A. Bird

    DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory

    Genes Dev

    (2002)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Functional CpG methylation system in a social insect

    Science

    (2006)
  • G. Liang et al.

    Cooperativity between DNA methyltransferases in the maintenance methylation of repetitive elements

    Mol Cell Biol

    (2002)
  • M.G. Goll et al.

    Methylation of tRNAAsp by the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2

    Science

    (2006)
  • R.J. Klose et al.

    Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators

    Trends Biochem Sci

    (2006)
  • T.T. Ching et al.

    Epigenome analyses using BAC microarrays identify evolutionary conservation of tissue-specific methylation of SHANK3

    Nat Genet

    (2005)
  • M. Hu et al.

    Distinct epigenetic changes in the stromal cells of breast cancers

    Nat Genet

    (2005)
  • B. Khulan et al.

    Comparative isoschizomer profiling of cytosine methylation: the HELP assay

    Genome Res

    (2006)
  • A.E. Ibrahim et al.

    MMASS: an optimized array-based method for assessing CpG island methylation

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2006)
  • Z. Lippman et al.

    Profiling DNA methylation patterns using genomic tiling microarrays

    Nat Methods

    (2005)
  • M.J. Fazzari et al.

    Epigenomics: beyond CpG islands

    Nat Rev Genet

    (2004)
  • M. Weber et al.

    Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells

    Nat Genet

    (2005)
  • I. Keshet et al.

    Evidence for an instructive mechanism of de novo methylation in cancer cells

    Nat Genet

    (2006)
  • C. Gebhard et al.

    Genome-wide profiling of CpG methylation identifies novel targets of aberrant hypermethylation in myeloid leukemia

    Cancer Res

    (2006)
  • T. Rauch et al.

    MIRA-assisted microarray analysis, a new technology for the determination of DNA methylation patterns, identifies frequent methylation of homeodomain-containing genes in lung cancer cells

    Cancer Res

    (2006)
  • E.U. Selker et al.

    The methylated component of the Neurospora crassa genome

    Nature

    (2003)
  • F. Eckhardt et al.

    DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22

    Nat Genet

    (2006)
  • C. Bock et al.

    CpG island methylation in human lymphocytes is highly correlated with DNA sequence, repeats, and predicted DNA structure

    PLoS Genet

    (2006)
  • R. Das et al.

    Computational prediction of methylation status in human genomic sequences

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2006)
  • P.D. Rabinowicz et al.

    Genes and transposons are differentially methylated in plants, but not in mammals

    Genome Res

    (2003)
  • S.W. Chan et al.

    Two-step recruitment of RNA-directed DNA methylation to tandem repeats

    PLoS Biol

    (2006)
  • B. Huettel et al.

    Endogenous targets of RNA-directed DNA methylation and Pol IV in Arabidopsis

    EMBO J

    (2006)
  • M. Freitag et al.

    DNA methylation is independent of RNA interference in Neurospora

    Science

    (2004)
  • Cited by (312)

    • Modulation of epigenetic methylation enzymes by synthetic and natural agents

      2023, Transcription and Translation in Health and Disease
    • Mechanisms of DNA methylation and histone modifications

      2023, Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science
    • DNA methylation: its role in retinal health and diseases

      2022, Handbook of Basic and Clinical Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
    • How stress affects gene expression through epigenetic modifications

      2022, Epigenetics of Stress and Stress Disorders
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text