Elsevier

Chemosphere

Volume 73, Issue 1, Supplement, August 2008, Pages S284-S289
Chemosphere

Chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyl profiles of workers with trichlorophenol and pentachlorophenol exposures

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.034Get rights and content

Abstract

We examined the serum lipid adjusted levels of 2,3,7,8-substituted chlorinated dioxins and furans, and four coplanar PCBs for 98 workers. We found workers who worked only in the trichlorophenol units had mean lipid adjusted 2,3,7,8-TCDD levels of 36.8 ppt significantly higher (p < 0.05) than 6.0 ppt in the reference group. Workers who worked only in the pentachlorophenol units had mean lipid adjusted levels for 123478-HxCDD of 14.8 ppt, 123678-HxCDD of 156.4 ppt,123789-HxCDD of 23.7 ppt, 1234678-HpCDD of 234.6 ppt, and OCDD of 2,778.2 ppt significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the reference group levels for the same congeners of 7.5, 71.8, 8.0, 67.5, and 483.2 ppt, respectively. While we did find 12378-PeCDD levels higher than the reference group in trichlorophenol and pentachlorophenol workers, the differences are small, and could be attributed to normal variation. All furan levels among the trichlorophenol or pentachlorophenol only workers were not significantly different than the reference group. Workers with both trichlorophenol and pentachlorophenol exposures had mean dioxin levels consistent with complex chlorophenol exposures. Tradesmen who worked throughout the plant had congener profiles consistent with both trichlorophenol and pentachlorophenol exposures. PCB 169, 23478-PeCDF, 123478-HxCDF, and 123678-HxCDF levels were also significantly greater (p < 0.05) in these tradesmen than in the reference group. We found distinct patterns of dioxin congeners many years after exposure among workers with different chlorophenol exposures. We were effectively able to distinguish past trichlorophenol exposures from pentachlorophenol exposures based on differing serum dioxin profiles among workers.

Introduction

Polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorodibenzofurans may be formed as unintended by-products in the production of 2,4,5-trichlorophenol (TCP) and pentachlorophenol (PCP). Studies of persons with significant TCP exposures find 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2378-TCDD) levels above background with some of these studies also reporting elevated 12378-PeCDD levels (Nygren et al., 1988, Beck et al., 1989, Papke et al., 1992, Piacitelli et al., 1992, Smith et al., 1992, Ott et al., 1993, Littorin et al., 1994, Flesch-Janys et al., 1996, Heederik et al., 1998, Ryan and Schecter, 2000). Persons exposed to PCP often have 123478-HxCDD, 123678-HxCDD, 123789-HxCDD, 1234678-HpCDD, and OCDD levels above background. Some studies also report higher 12378-PeCDD, 123478-HxCDF, and 1234678-HpCDF levels (Ryan et al., 1987, Papke et al., 1992, Littorin et al., 1994, Schecter et al., 1994, Flesch-Janys et al., 1996, Schecter et al., 1996, Coenraads et al., 1999).

We examined serum dioxin, furan, and PCB levels among former workers in production of TCP and PCP, and compared these levels with workers at the same plant without potential for workplace exposures. These chlorophenol workers have been studied previously in several epidemiology studies (Townsend et al., 1982, Bond et al., 1983, Bond et al., 1989, Bodner et al., 2003). The current study is unusual because workers may have been exposed to either or both TCP and PCP. Thus this study provides a rare opportunity to compare 2,3,7,8-substituted chlorinated dioxins and furans profiles among two types of chlorophenol workers. We will determine if the dioxin and furan profiles for our workers differ from previous studies of TCP and PCP workers, and how distinct the dioxin “fingerprints” are for these chlorophenols many years after workplace exposures have ceased.

Section snippets

Methods

We reported the design and the determinants of the dioxin levels for these workers and the impact of age and body fat on dioxin levels previously (Collins et al., 2006, Collins et al., 2007). In the present study, we now examine the dioxin and furan profiles by occupational exposure source. Briefly, a sample of men living within 50 miles of the Dow Chemical plant in Midland, Michigan who worked at the plant during chlorophenol production was included in the study. These workers had potential

Results

Table 1 presents the lipid adjusted average dioxin, furan, and PCB levels for the four exposed groups and the reference group. Age, body mass index (BMI), the number of months worked at the plant, the number of months with potential for chlorophenol exposures, and the range of last exposure to chlorophenol as also presented. We compare each of the exposed groups to the reference workers. The reference workers averaged 64.0 years of age, had a BMI of 28.8, worked 303.6 months at the plant and

Discussion

We have found distinct “fingerprints” for TCP and PCP workers. TCP workers have mostly increased levels of 2378-TCDD. This finding is consistent with several other studies (Nygren et al., 1988, Beck et al., 1989, Papke et al., 1992, Piacitelli et al., 1992, Smith et al., 1992, Ott et al., 1993, Littorin et al., 1994, Flesch-Janys et al., 1996, Heederik et al., 1998, Ryan and Schecter, 2000). Some studies of persons with TCP exposure do report higher 12378-PeCDD levels. While we do find

Conclusions

In 2004, we examined the serum dioxin levels of 98 long term workers at a plant with chlorophenol units. The years of last exposure to chlorophenol in these units ranged from 1944 to 1980. Even though serum dioxin, furan, and PCB were measured many years after exposure, we found distinct patterns of dioxin congeners among workers with different chlorophenol exposures and we were effectively able to distinguish TCP workers from PCP workers among those with serum dioxin levels above background.

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by The Dow Chemical Company. We would like to thank members of the Dow Chemical’s Health Services staff including Melody Raab, Sandy Murray, Lisa Pressnell, and Kathleen Collins, for arranging the appointments, and drawing and separating the blood, members of the Dow Chemical’s Toxicology Environmental Research Center including Kathy Brzak and Melissa Mielke for storing, packing, and shipping the sera, Tim Bell of Dow Chemical’s Toxicology Environmental Research Center

References (33)

  • B.G. Svensson et al.

    Exposure to polychlorinated dioxins (PCDD) and dibenzofurans (PCDF) from graphite electrodes in a chloralkali plant

    Chemosphere

    (1993)
  • K.M. Bodner et al.

    Cancer risk for chemical workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

    Occup. Environ. Med.

    (2003)
  • G.G. Bond et al.

    Incidence of chloracne among chemical workers potentially exposed to chlorinated dioxins

    J. Occup. Med.

    (1989)
  • G.G. Bond et al.

    Medical and morbidity surveillance findings among employees potentially exposed to TCDD

    Br. J. Ind. Med.

    (1983)
  • P.J. Coenraads et al.

    Blood lipid concentrations of dioxin and dibenzofurans causing chloracne

    Br. J. Dermatol.

    (1999)
  • J.J. Collins et al.

    Serum dioxin levels in former chlorophenol workers

    J. Exp. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (12)

    • Bio-accumulation of organic contaminants in Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins: Preliminary unique features of the brain and testes

      2020, Environmental Pollution
      Citation Excerpt :

      PCBs are transported into the brain and testes of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins despite the influence of the blood–brain/testis barrier. Therefore, exposure to PCBs represents a neurotoxicological risk (Collins et al., 2008) and shows negative correlation with circulating reproductive hormone levels in men (Bonde et al., 2008; Goncharov et al., 2009). Exposure to the technical-grade mixture of PCBs such as Aroclor 1254 during development in rats leads to memory and learning disorder (Sable et al., 2006).

    • Exposure data

      2016, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text