Relevance of two-dimensional gas chromatography and high resolution olfactometry for the parallel determination of heat-induced toxicants and odorants in cooked food☆
Introduction
Cooking has both positive and negative impacts on food quality. While cooking is necessary to develop the desirable flavours in food, besides making it digestible as well as destroying harmful organisms, the oxidation and pyrolysis of fats, especially at frying temperatures, can give rise to compounds that decompose creating undesirable flavours and various process-induced toxicants, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Nowadays, there is an increasing demand to limit the negative influence of cooking, with a specific emphasis on heat-induced toxicants such as PAHs, while preserving sensory properties of processed food, focusing on odour-active compounds. It is therefore necessary to develop analytical tools for the parallel investigation of process-induced toxicants and odorants generated during food cooking.
More than 100 PAHs have been characterized in nature as genotoxic carcinogens and biological mutagens [1]. PAH-induced carcinogenesis may result when a PAH-DNA adduct is formed on a critical site for the regulation of cell differentiation or growth. Interactions of various PAHs have been shown to produce both synergistic and antagonistic effects in mutagenicity tests in vitro [2]. For non-smokers and non-occupationally exposed populations, dietary intake has been identified as the principal route of human exposure to PAHs [3]. Efforts have thus been made to limit their formation in food through understanding the influence of various food processes including cooking. Therefore, food control authorities including the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) [4] and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) [5] have started monitoring the priority PAHs and seeking advanced methodology related to their detection in food [6]. Recently, methods using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) have been reported to improve the chromatographic resolution for PAH determination in food [7], [8], [9]. The high resolution of GC × GC allows for separation of the target compounds from matrix interferences and may enable the resolution of most coelutions reputed to persist in one-dimensional GC [10], even if the recent development of congener-specific GC-columns for PAH analysis might also offer promising alternatives [11], [12]. The time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF/MS) detector has been largely used to detect narrow peaks obtained from fast separation in the second chromatographic dimension making it easier to identify additional relevant compounds [10], [13].
Cooking is also responsible for the development of food aroma [14], [15]. For the screening of key odorants in food products, gas chromatography olfactometry (GC-O) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) is commonly applied involving one or more human assessors or sniffers [16]. However, most of the reported techniques are unable to provide precise quantitative evaluation due to the wide variability of individual responses, variability between experimental sequences, as well as coelutions making it difficult to identify odour-active compounds. Pollien et al. [17] have demonstrated that a panel of at least eight sniffers was required to obtain a robust and reproducible aromagram. To overcome this drawback, a computerized multibooth GC–MS/8O system was developed to obtain an aromagram from a panel of eight sniffers for simultaneous detection of compounds using a single run [18]. Despite using high resolution GC, the 1D-separation achieved with the GC–MS/8O system is not always sufficient to resolve all the coeluted odour zones. One of the most popular options to elucidate these complex odour zones is to re-separate them with a second GC column hyphenated to olfactometry. The importance of multidimensional separation (MDGC) techniques, including heart-cutting GC–GC–MS/O providing an improved capacity to resolve the constituents of a sample, was recently reviewed by Marriott et al. [19].
This paper is aimed at assessing the relevance of multidimensional GC techniques hyphenated to MS and olfactometry for the parallel investigation of process-induced toxicants and odorants generated during food cooking starting with meat as a food model. In a first step, a multiresidue method based on ASE-GC × GC–TOF/MS was developed in order to investigate 16 targeted PAHs in cooked meat matrices. In a second step, the main odour-active compounds of the same matrices were determined by high resolution olfactometry. This approach consists in refining the detailed aromagrams provided by GC–MS/8O with the high resolution of a customized heart-cutting GC–GC–MS/O. Finally, these analytical developments were used to investigate the parallel generation of PAHs and odour-active compounds for various domestic cooking conditions.
Section snippets
Chemicals
PAH reference standards were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). The concentrations of the 16 PAHs in the stock solution were 4 μg mL−1. Three D-labelled PAHs (acenaphthylene-D8, p-terphenyl-D14 and benzo[e]pyrene-D12) were used as internal standards for the accurate quantification of target compounds (Wellington Laboratories Inc., ON, Canada). Solvents (analytical grade) and anhydrous sodium sulfate were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich. All glassware was deactivated by soaking in a 5%
Performance of ASE-GC × GC–TOF/MS for PAH analysis
As shown in Fig. 2A, the two-dimensional GC column setting as well as the temperature programme used to analyze PAHs at 50 μg L−1 in hexane enabled the successful separation of 16 PAHs in neat solvent over a 2D chromatographic space. For PAH analysis, quality of separation is crucial due to their high stability which makes them difficult to fragment even in EI mode, leading to identification exclusively based on the molecular ion [28]. Consequently, the main challenge for PAH quantification
Conclusion
GC × GC–TOF/MS was confirmed to be a relevant technique for the multiresidue determination of process-induced toxicants like PAHs. The concept of high resolution olfactometry through GC–MS/8O combined with heart-cutting GC–GC–MS/O was shown to be useful to unmask coelution of odour-active compounds resisting to 1D GC and could be systematically applied to complex processed foods to reveal aroma profile. Comprehensive analysis of heat-induced toxicants and odorants revealed that severe cooking
References (47)
- et al.
Analytical methods for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in food and the environment needed for new food legislation in the European Union
Trends Anal. Chem.
(2006) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the diet
Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ.
(1999)- et al.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food and beverages. Analytical methods and trends
J. Chromatogr. A
(2010) - et al.
Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography using large sample volume injection for the determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in complex matrices
J. Chromatogr. A
(2003) - et al.
Pressurised liquid extraction-comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography for fast-screening of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil
J. Chromatogr. A
(2003) - et al.
Quantification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons based on comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–isotope dilution mass spectrometry
J. Chromatogr. A
(2008) - et al.
Validation of the analysis of the 15 + 1 European-priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by donor–acceptor complex chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography–ultraviolet/fluorescence detection
J. Chromatogr. A
(2008) - et al.
Human dietary exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: results of the second French Total Diet Study
Environ. Int.
(2013) - et al.
Quantification in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography and a model of quantification based on selected summed modulated peaks
J. Chromatogr. A
(2008) - et al.
Multidimensional gas chromatography
Trends Anal. Chem.
(2012)
Novel multi-gas chromatography-olfactometry device and software for the identification of odour-active compounds
J. Chromatogr. A
Effect of nitrite on the odourant volatile fraction of cooked ham
Food Chem.
Identification and origin of odorous sulfur compounds in cooked ham
Food Chem.
Benchmarking of candidate detectors for multiresidue analysis of pesticides by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography
J. Chromatogr. A
Systematic ratio normalization of gas chromatography signals for biological sample discrimination and biomarker discovery
Anal. Chim. Acta
Innovative method for determination of 19 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food and oil samples using gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry based on an isotope dilution approach
J. Chromatogr. A
Comprehensive analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in wastewater using stir bar sorptive extraction and gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry
Anal. Chim. Acta
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon analysis in different matrices of the marine environment
Anal. Chim. Acta
Simultaneous multidetermination of residues of pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in olive-pomace oils by gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry
J. Chromatogr. A
Comparison of column phase configurations for comprehensive two dimensional gas chromatographic analysis of crude oil and bitumen
Org. Geochem.
Identification of potent odourants in wine and brewed coffee using gas chromatography-olfactometry and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography
J. Chromatogr. A
Flavour formation in meat and meat products: a review
Food Chem.
A review of Maillard reaction in food and implications to kinetic modelling
Trends Food Sci. Technol.
Cited by (22)
The chemical safety of organic meat in question
2023, Cahiers de Nutrition et de DietetiqueSensory acceptability of antioxidant-based formulations dedicated to mitigate heterocyclic aromatic amines in cooked meat
2023, Meat ScienceCitation Excerpt :The odor-active compound determination was carried out according to the work of Giri et al. (2015) using a unique GC–MS/8O system accumulating the performance of 8 judges simultaneously on the same sample to detect what were the most significant odor zones in the chromatogram. The volatile compounds were extracted by dynamic headspace (Tekmar, Cincinnati, OH, USA) coupled to gas chromatography (GC 6890A, Agilent Technologies) hyphenated to a quadrupole mass detector (HP4440 system, Agilent Technologies) according to Giri et al. (2015). The sample was purged with helium (purity 99.995%) at 30 °C for 1 h with a flow rate of 40 mL.min−1 using a Tenax trap.
Research progress in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and its combination with olfactometry systems in the flavor analysis field
2022, Journal of Food Composition and AnalysisThe eating quality of meat: III—Flavor
2022, Lawrie's Meat ScienceFlavors and odors analysis
2020, Chemical Analysis of Food: Techniques and Applications, Second Edition
- ☆
Presented at 38th International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography and 11th GC × GC Symposium, 18–23 May 2014, Riva del Garda, Italy.