New Diagnostic Aids for Melanoma
Introduction
According to estimates, there will be approximately 70,000 new cases of melanoma and 8800 subsequent deaths in 2011. For 2012 the estimates are 76,250 cases and 9180 deaths.1 The incidence of melanoma has been steadily increasing and has doubled in recent decades.2 For lesions with a depth of less than 1 mm, surgical excision is usually curative and 5-year survival rate is 93% to 97%.3 By contrast, distant metastatic melanoma has an extremely poor prognosis and 5-year survival ranges from 10% to 20%, depending on location of the metastasis.3 Detection of melanoma at an early stage is critical for improving the survival rate. In addition to decreased survival of late-stage versus early-stage melanoma, the cost of treating a late-stage melanoma is dramatically higher. Recent estimates show the total costs of in situ tumors to be around $4700, whereas a stage IV melanoma has a total cost of approximately $160,000.4 The cost of treating late-stage melanoma is likely to increase with the implementation of newly approved treatments such as ipilimumab, which costs about $120,000 for a full treatment.
Despite advances in diagnostic aids such as dermatoscopy, detection has remained a significant challenge, and improved methods of accurately diagnosing melanoma are needed. Studies have shown that even for expert dermoscopists, accurately diagnosing melanoma, particularly in small-diameter lesions, is very challenging, with one study showing a biopsy sensitivity of 71% for melanomas of size less than 6 mm.5 To measure specificity, numerous studies have looked at biopsy ratios (ie, the number of biopsies of benign lesions performed to make the diagnosis of one skin cancer), and numbers vary widely. On the low end, a study from a specialized pigmented lesion clinic showed a biopsy ratio of approximately 5:1 (5 benign lesions per melanoma biopsied).6 A recent retrospective study involving 8 practitioners at a single institution had a biopsy ratio of 15:1.7 On the high end, a study involving a single physician over a 14-year period showed a biopsy ratio of more than 500:1 in patients with no history of melanoma.8 Given these challenges, new diagnostic aids that could help increase both sensitivity and specificity of biopsies would be of great benefit to patients and physicians. Such improvements (Table 1) have the potential to lead to increased diagnosis of early lesions, which would improve survival and lower the overall cost of treating melanoma. In addition, improved diagnostic techniques would lead to fewer biopsies and decreased morbidity to patients.
Section snippets
Physician and Patient Detection of Malignant Melanoma
Multiple studies have tried to assess who initially detects melanomas, with most finding that the majority of melanomas are detected by the patient.9, 10, 11 Patient education, including the ABCDEs (Asymmetry, Border irregularity, Color variegation, Diameter of >6 mm, and Evolution) of melanoma will always be an important part of helping patients to diagnose melanoma.12, 13 In addition, regular self-examinations of the skin should be encouraged, as they have been associated with detection of
Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy
Confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) is a noninvasive imaging technology that provides in vivo images of the epidermis and papillary dermis in real time. There are currently 2 forms of CSLM in use: reflectance mode, which is primarily used in clinical practice, and fluorescence mode, used primarily in research. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) relies on the inherent reflective properties of tissue structures, whereas fluorescence CSLM relies on fluorescent dyes to provide contrast for
Other imaging technologies
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a well-established tool in ophthalmology. OCT is commonly used as a diagnostic aid for uveal melanoma43 and has shown usefulness in dermatology as well. OCT is analogous to ultrasound imaging, except that it uses light rather than sound waves. OCT uses a low-coherence-length light source to evaluate lesion architecture up to 1 mm in depth.44 One study showed that OCT allows for in vivo correlation between dermatoscopic parameters and histopathologic
Noninvasive Genomic Detection
Epidermal genetic information retrieval (EGIR; DermTech International, La Jolla, CA, USA) uses an adhesive tape placed on suspicious lesions to sample cells from the stratum corneum noninvasively. RNA isolated from cells is amplified using real-time polymerase chain reaction and then hybridized with Affymetrix human genome U133 plus 2.0 GeneChip. Gene expression is then analyzed. Using this technology, 312 genes that are differentially expressed between melanoma, nevi, and normal skin were
Summary
Despite recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant melanoma, it still remains a potentially devastating disease if not diagnosed early and treated properly. With incidence continuing to increase, advances in diagnostic techniques are necessary because diagnosing melanoma is difficult and current methods still miss too many cases, especially in small-diameter lesions. Moreover, biopsying benign lesions can lead to increased morbidity to patients and increased cost to the health
References (63)
- et al.
Breslow depth of cutaneous melanoma: impact of factors related to surveillance of the skin, including prior skin biopsies and family history of melanoma
J Am Acad Dermatol
(2005) - et al.
Actas Dermosifiliogr
(2008) - et al.
Addition of dermoscopy to conventional naked-eye examination in melanoma screening: a randomized study
J Am Acad Dermatol
(2004) - et al.
Results from an observational trial: digital epiluminescence microscopy follow-up of atypical nevi increases the sensitivity and the chance of success of conventional dermoscopy in detecting melanoma
J Invest Dermatol
(2006) - et al.
The impact of total body photography on biopsy rate in patients from a pigmented lesion clinic
J Am Acad Dermatol
(2007) - et al.
The real-time, three-dimensional analyses of benign and malignant skin tumors by confocal laser scanning microscopy
J Dermatol Sci
(2006) - et al.
In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin II: advances in instrumentation and comparison with histology
J Invest Dermatol
(1999) - et al.
Diagnostic applicability of in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy in melanocytic skin tumors
J Invest Dermatol
(2005) - et al.
Quantitative discrimination of pigmented lesions using three-dimensional high-resolution ultrasound reflex transmission imaging
J Invest Dermatol
(2007) - et al.
Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues
Ultrason Imaging
(1991)
Real-time tissue elastography: a helpful tool in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma?
J Am Acad Dermatol
Sniffer dogs in the melanoma clinic?
Lancet
Another sniffer dog for the clinic?
Lancet
Cancer statistics, 2012
CA Cancer J Clin
Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths
CA Cancer J Clin
Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification
J Clin Oncol
Melanoma costs: a dynamic model comparing estimated overall costs of various clinical stages
Dermatol Online J
The diagnostic performance of expert dermoscopists vs a computer-vision system on small-diameter melanomas
Arch Dermatol
Frequency and characteristics of melanomas missed at a pigmented lesion clinic: a registry-based study
Melanoma Res
How good are US dermatologists at discriminating skin cancers? A number-needed-to-treat analysis
J Dermatolog Treat
Surgical prophylaxis of malignant melanoma
Ann Surg
Patterns of detection in patients with cutaneous melanoma
Cancer
Is physician detection associated with thinner melanomas?
JAMA
Routine dermatologist-performed full-body skin examination and early melanoma detection
Arch Dermatol
Early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: revisiting the ABCD criteria
JAMA
ABCDE—an evolving concept in the early detection of melanoma
Arch Dermatol
Screening for cutaneous melanoma by skin self-examination
J Natl Cancer Inst
Dermatologist detection and skin self-examination are associated with thinner melanomas: results from a survey of the Italian Multidisciplinary Group on Melanoma
Arch Dermatol
Efficacy of skin self-examination practices for early melanoma detection
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
Ability to self-detect malignant melanoma decreases with age
Clin Exp Dermatol
Improvement of malignant/benign ratio in excised melanocytic lesions in the ‘dermoscopy era’: a retrospective study 1997-2001
Br J Dermatol
Cited by (45)
Cutaneous melanoma
2021, Medicine (Spain)Intravital imaging of cutaneous immune responses
2020, Cellular ImmunologyCitation Excerpt :In Europe and the United States, this technique is applicable for clinical diagnostic purposes, and the cost is around US$150 per examination [34]. It was reported that confocal microscopy has superior sensitivity and specificity compared to dermoscopy, a widely used magnifying lens for observing pigmented lesions in the clinical setting, in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma [34]. Because confocal microscopy is a noninvasive diagnostic method, it may take the place of skin biopsy and lead to a decrease in medical cost in the future.
Computational texture features of dermoscopic images and their link to the descriptive terminology: A survey
2019, Computer Methods and Programs in BiomedicineCitation Excerpt :To detect melanoma at its earliest stage and complement the clinical analysis, physicians widely employ a technique called dermoscopy. Although there are other approaches, dermoscopy is the most extensively used in the medical field [42]. It is an in-vivo, non-invasive imaging technique used to improve the early diagnosis of malignant melanoma by means of a magnifying glass with light to acquire digital images of cutaneous lesions.
Cells to Surgery Quiz: July 2019
2019, Journal of Investigative DermatologyTechniques and algorithms for computer aided diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions—A review
2018, Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlRecent advances in diagnosis and therapy of skin cancers through nanotechnological approaches
2017, Nanostructures for Cancer Therapy
Funding Sources: Dr Ferris: NIH/NCRR grant number 5 UL1 RR024153-04. Dr Harris: None.
Conflicts of Interest: Dr Ferris: Served as an investigator and consultant for MELA Sciences and as an investigator for DermTech International. Dr Harris: No conflicts of interest to declare.