International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Short, thin asbestos fibers contribute to the development of human malignant mesothelioma: pathological evidence
Introduction
Stanton et al. (1981) concluded from experimental data using rats that long (greater than and equal to 8 μm in length) and thin (less than and equal to 0.25 μm in width) asbestos fibers were strongly carcinogenic in the experimental induction of malignant mesothelioma and that shorter and thicker fibers posed less risk (Stanton's hypothesis). In their study, Stanton et al. used three subtypes of amphibole fibers: crocidolite, tremolite and amosite. Chrysotile fibers were excluded, although Stanton and Wrench (1972) had previously observed a high incidence of mesothelioma in rats exposed to chrysotile fibers. Stanton and Wrench (1972) stated that direct application of their results to the problem of human carcinogenesis would be unwise. Nevertheless, Stanton's model has been directly applied to the counting of the asbestos fibers in man, and certain scientists have claimed that short, thin asbestos fibers pose little or no risk to human health (McDonald et al., 1989; ASTDR Report, 2003).
Additionally, the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has accepted the argument that short, thin asbestos fibers pose little risk. Accordingly, the current OSHA methodology for evaluating airborne fibrous dusts in an industrial atmosphere uses light microscopy (phase microscopy) and counts only those asbestos fibers that are longer than 5 μm with an aspect ration larger than 3 to 1. This methodology considers that fibers shorter than 5 μm may not be carcinogenic.
Our previous studies have revealed that a disparity is frequently present in both the type and number of asbestos fibers between the lung and mesothelial tissues. We have hypothesized that such a disparity might be caused by chrysotile fiber's strong capacity to translocate from the lung into the pleura and peritoneum (Kohyama and Suzuki, 1991; Suzuki and Yuen, 2001, Suzuki and Yuen, 2002). We have also suggested that short, thin asbestos fibers can contribute to the causation of human malignant mesothelioma, since these fibers were the principal type of asbestos fibers encountered in the mesothelial tissues from the mesothelioma patients (Suzuki and Yuen, 2001, Suzuki and Yuen, 2002). This suggestion was based on our preliminary study of the dimensions of 10,575 asbestos fibers detected in both the lung and mesothelial tissues from168 cases of human malignant mesothelioma (Suzuki and Yuen, 2002).
To further validate our above claim, we have performed additional analyses of these 10,575 asbestos fibers. Type, dimension (length and width) and numerical proportion in two tissue sites including lung and mesothelial tissues were clarified in each of these fibers. Furthermore, we have compared the detection sensitivity of short, thin asbestos fibers between two distinct techniques, the digestion technique of bulk tissue samples and the ashing technique of tissue section samples.
As results, we concluded that as previously suggested, short, thin asbestos fibers appeared to contribute to the causation of human malignant mesothelioma since they were the majority seen in the two tissues and that the ashing technique of tissue sections was more effective to demonstrate such submicroscopic fibers.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Lung and mesothelial tissues (fibroplastic pleural and peritoneal, pleural hyaline plaque and pleural and/or peritoneal mesotheliomatous tissue) from 168 cases of human malignant mesothelioma (164 males and 4 females; 156 pleural and 12 peritoneal; definite or probable diagnostic certainty) were used. These tissues were of autopsy or biopsy samples that had been sent to the principal author for pathological review over a 15-year period and subsequently archived at the Mount Sinai School of
Results
Dimensions of asbestos fibers detected in lung and mesothelial tissues are shown in Table 1A. Maximum length and width was found in amosite fibers, although minimum length and width were seen in chrysotile. Chrysotile fibers were generally shorter and thinner (Table 1B). Other amphibole fibers, such as crocidolite, tremolite and anthophyllite were smaller in number in these tissues, but also longer and thicker, compared with the dimensions of the chrysotile fibers (Table 1B).
Discussion
Since it has been reported that asbestos fibers, particularly short thin chrysotile fibers can be found in water, food and indoor air pollution, as well as in paraffin (Chesson et al., 1990; Melino et al., 1991; Addison et al., 1993; Lee et al., 1995; Kashansky and Slyshkina, 2002) we have examined control samples which proved to be free from asbestos fibers including short, thin chrysotile fibers.
Therefore, we conclude that the short, thin chrysotile fibers detected in the lung and mesothelial
References (45)
- et al.
Asbestos fibers in parenteral medication
Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
(1993) - et al.
Airborne asbestos in public buildings
Environ. Res.
(1990) - et al.
Asbestos in extrapulmonary sites. Omentum and mesentery
Chest
(2000) - et al.
Transfection of human mesothelial cells medicated by different asbestos fiber types
Environ. Res.
(1993) - et al.
Asbestos fibers mediate transformation of monkey cells by exogeneous plasmid DNA
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
(1988) - ASTDR, 2003. Report on the expert panel on health effects of asbestos and synthetic vitreous fibers: the influence of...
- et al.
Black spots concentrate oncogenic asbestos fibers in the parietal pleura-thoracoscopic and mineralogic study
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
(1996) - et al.
Comparison of phase contrast and electron microscopic methods for evaluation of occupational asbestos exposure
Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg.
(1990) - et al.
A comparison of asbestos burden in lung parenchyma, lymph nodes and plaques
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
(1991) - et al.
Asbestos fiber length as related to potential pathogenicity: a critical review
Am. J. Ind. Med.
(2003)
Fibers
Am. J. Ind. Med.
Fiber carcinogenesis: epidemiological observations and the Stanton hypothesis
JNCI
Chrysotile fiber is a strong mutagen in mammalian cells
Cancer Res.
Characterization of asbestos bodies and uncoated fibers in lung of hamster
J. Electron Microsc.
Milky spots (taches laiteuses) as structures which trap asbestos in mesothelial layers and their significance in the pathogenesis of mesothelial neoplasia
Int. J. Cancer
Asbestos in water sources of the Bazhenovskoye chrysotile asbestos deposits
Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health
Analysis of asbestos fibers in lung parenchyma, pleura and mesothelioma tissues of North American insulation workers
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
Evaluation of low-level asbestos exposure by transbronchial lung biopsy with analytical electron microscopy
J. Electron Microsc.
Mineral phases and some reexamined characteristics of the international union against cancer standard asbestos samples
Am. J. Ind. Med.
Investigation and analysis of asbestos fibers and accompanying minerals in biological materials
Environ. Health Perspect.
Cited by (147)
Detection of fine asbestos fibers using fluorescently labeled asbestos-binding proteins in talc
2023, Journal of Hazardous Materials AdvancesSize characteristics of asbestiform fibers in lung tissue of animals that grazed in areas rich in ophiolitic outcrops in Central Calabria (Southern Italy)
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Unfortunately, these outcrops could contain fibrous minerals (both asbestos and asbestiform habit minerals), potentially harmful for human health: the respirable asbestos fibers might penetrate into the lung tissue leading to an asbestos-related disease (e.g. asbestosis, lung cancer, or mesothelioma) (McDonald and McDonald, 1997; Selikoff and Lee, 1978; Senyigit et al., 2004; Suzuki and Yuen, 2002). Due to human activities or weathering processes, mineral asbestos-bearing rocks could release fibers in the surrounding environment, representing a potential risk for human health (Bloise et al., 2016; Bloise et al., 2019; Cavallo and Rimoldi, 2013; Gamble and Gibbs, 2008; Karagüzel and Kiliç, 2000; Langer, 2008; Pugnaloni et al., 2013; Suzuki et al., 2005). Several studies (Abratt et al., 2004; Hansen et al., 1998; Magnani et al., 2001) showed an association with environmental exposure to asbestos or other mineral fibers and an increased risk of mesothelioma.
The silent malignant mesothelioma epidemic: a call to action
2022, The Lancet Oncology